Same! I note the bold sections but don't understand the significance. As I posted above, it seems like the authors are saying all these things are positives? I don't have any experience in interpreting how authors usually present their data or have any technical knowledge either.
Same! I note the bold sections but don't understand the significance. As I posted above, it seems like the authors are saying all these things are positives? I don't have any experience in interpreting how authors usually present their data or have any technical knowledge either.
No, they're negatives. The only positive is the "one of the positive developments blah blah rapid development of vaccines blah blah..." and most ONLY include similar statements to try to prevent data from being pulled from public eye. If they are totally discrediting the vaccine their articles, studies, preprints get yanked, so the solution is to slap a 'great job FDA, we love vaccines' on and it usually isn't pulled. It's strategy from most (not necessarily all).
Just pay close attention to Dr. Malone's own comments, summaries - and exclamation points and you'll get the main gist.
Do not give up:), Very few of us are trained virologist or biomedical researches, the unkwon technical vocabulary doesn't make the reading easy or enjoyable but the kernel of it it's explaned by Dr. Malone. And if time and interest permit we have an inmense library on our figertips thanks to the internet
Thank you for the question. It prompted me to give SirRWM a one-year subscription just so I could post an answer: vaccine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Keep running till you can't remember why.
Yes! I knew someone could help me out!! Thanks. And yes....barefoot as well. Snow is.....a learning curve! I also just subscribed to Trial Site News..... :)
Same! I note the bold sections but don't understand the significance. As I posted above, it seems like the authors are saying all these things are positives? I don't have any experience in interpreting how authors usually present their data or have any technical knowledge either.
No, they're negatives. The only positive is the "one of the positive developments blah blah rapid development of vaccines blah blah..." and most ONLY include similar statements to try to prevent data from being pulled from public eye. If they are totally discrediting the vaccine their articles, studies, preprints get yanked, so the solution is to slap a 'great job FDA, we love vaccines' on and it usually isn't pulled. It's strategy from most (not necessarily all).
Just pay close attention to Dr. Malone's own comments, summaries - and exclamation points and you'll get the main gist.
yeah. I don't read "Biology" stuff well. Maybe it's not even biology, but some other..."ology"
Do not give up:), Very few of us are trained virologist or biomedical researches, the unkwon technical vocabulary doesn't make the reading easy or enjoyable but the kernel of it it's explaned by Dr. Malone. And if time and interest permit we have an inmense library on our figertips thanks to the internet
Yes. The vocabulary is daunting...Thankfully, yes. Dr.. Malone can "interpret" most of the words. I have on occasion looked up a few words....
what is VAIDS? I struggle with abbreviations, too :)
Thank you for the question. It prompted me to give SirRWM a one-year subscription just so I could post an answer: vaccine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Keep running till you can't remember why.
Yes! I knew someone could help me out!! Thanks. And yes....barefoot as well. Snow is.....a learning curve! I also just subscribed to Trial Site News..... :)
100% your last sentence. TECHNICAL writing, especially.