No, they're negatives. The only positive is the "one of the positive developments blah blah rapid development of vaccines blah blah..." and most ONLY include similar statements to try to prevent data from being pulled from public eye. If they are totally discrediting the vaccine their articles, studies, preprints get yanked, so the so…
No, they're negatives. The only positive is the "one of the positive developments blah blah rapid development of vaccines blah blah..." and most ONLY include similar statements to try to prevent data from being pulled from public eye. If they are totally discrediting the vaccine their articles, studies, preprints get yanked, so the solution is to slap a 'great job FDA, we love vaccines' on and it usually isn't pulled. It's strategy from most (not necessarily all).
Just pay close attention to Dr. Malone's own comments, summaries - and exclamation points and you'll get the main gist.
No, they're negatives. The only positive is the "one of the positive developments blah blah rapid development of vaccines blah blah..." and most ONLY include similar statements to try to prevent data from being pulled from public eye. If they are totally discrediting the vaccine their articles, studies, preprints get yanked, so the solution is to slap a 'great job FDA, we love vaccines' on and it usually isn't pulled. It's strategy from most (not necessarily all).
Just pay close attention to Dr. Malone's own comments, summaries - and exclamation points and you'll get the main gist.