When reading the SCOTUS opinion and these articles that outline what the ruling was, I find that there ARE recent instances of people who have actually done what Chevron outlines as felonious. One would be Hillary Clinton who purposefully destroyed evidence. Another is the J6 Committee who has destroyed tapes and transcripts, even though…
When reading the SCOTUS opinion and these articles that outline what the ruling was, I find that there ARE recent instances of people who have actually done what Chevron outlines as felonious. One would be Hillary Clinton who purposefully destroyed evidence. Another is the J6 Committee who has destroyed tapes and transcripts, even though they were told to preserve everything. Do you suppose SWAT teams will now show up at their doors? We can only hope.
Brilliant point Norma!!! They should have written exemptions for democrats directly into Chevron to make no mistake who gets the swat teams and who never will…
When reading the SCOTUS opinion and these articles that outline what the ruling was, I find that there ARE recent instances of people who have actually done what Chevron outlines as felonious. One would be Hillary Clinton who purposefully destroyed evidence. Another is the J6 Committee who has destroyed tapes and transcripts, even though they were told to preserve everything. Do you suppose SWAT teams will now show up at their doors? We can only hope.
Brilliant point Norma!!! They should have written exemptions for democrats directly into Chevron to make no mistake who gets the swat teams and who never will…