I'm just spitballing here. But to your public policy priorities I might suggest a fourth: Screening "health" agency heads for psychopathy.
Being a glutton for despondency, and having sufficiently recovered from my last re-read of "The Real Anthony Fauci," I continue into my first read of "The Wuhan Cover-up." The picture is clear: we're d…
I'm just spitballing here. But to your public policy priorities I might suggest a fourth: Screening "health" agency heads for psychopathy.
Being a glutton for despondency, and having sufficiently recovered from my last re-read of "The Real Anthony Fauci," I continue into my first read of "The Wuhan Cover-up." The picture is clear: we're dealing with psychopaths who would gleefully and quite literally do anything to make sure rivers of cash flow into their agency coffers.
This is basically what the Polish psychologist Łobaczewski, author of Political Ponerology, advocated in his book. After studying the decline of governmental morals during the Soviet occupation of Poland, he concluded that psychopaths could not be allowed to govern.
I'm just spitballing here. But to your public policy priorities I might suggest a fourth: Screening "health" agency heads for psychopathy.
Being a glutton for despondency, and having sufficiently recovered from my last re-read of "The Real Anthony Fauci," I continue into my first read of "The Wuhan Cover-up." The picture is clear: we're dealing with psychopaths who would gleefully and quite literally do anything to make sure rivers of cash flow into their agency coffers.
well, there is that....
This is basically what the Polish psychologist Łobaczewski, author of Political Ponerology, advocated in his book. After studying the decline of governmental morals during the Soviet occupation of Poland, he concluded that psychopaths could not be allowed to govern.
Just stop short with sociopaths?