The Joe Rogan interviews with Peter McCullough and Robert Malone, back to back, late in 2021, have already been seen by those with an historical eye, as the pivotal point in the rise of the anti-mRNA injection argument from relative obscurity to a substantial audience. And especially, your interview. These two programs nailed down the sc…
The Joe Rogan interviews with Peter McCullough and Robert Malone, back to back, late in 2021, have already been seen by those with an historical eye, as the pivotal point in the rise of the anti-mRNA injection argument from relative obscurity to a substantial audience. And especially, your interview. These two programs nailed down the scientific basis of the opposition to the injections. No one can ever displace Rogan, McCullough and yourself from that credit--and you were the most convincing and important, mostly due to your relaxed demeanor and background in the mRNA world. Dr. Breggin is clearly motivated by jealousy, as shown in his ridiculous attacks against Matthias Desmet, based on a single sentence rather than the whole book. When this all began, Del BIgtree said: "we don't need to all agree, to be on the same side." The ability to accept differences of opinion and background is a sign of maturity--which Jane Ruby clearly lacks. It should also be understood that in a popular movement there are often several prominent voices--in this case, many. Different experiences and voices speak to different people. So continue your good work and try not to be bothered by the insects flying around you.
Thanks for that feedback, Ed. It was pretty obvious, and a few perceptive talking heads have said it, but it is the consensus of many ordinary viewers, such as you and I, that ultimately make it true.
It is curious that Dr Malone, perhaps the most calm spoken credentialled critic of the globalist, receives such extreme flax from those who appear to also be aginst the vaccine, but are so in an extreme emotional way, full of way out of the box ideology that only harms the rational skeptic cause. Thus, by their extremism and poorly supported ideology, they discredit rational skepticism, and also attempt to tear down the most rational skeptics. Hummm, makes one wonder about their motive.
The Joe Rogan interviews with Peter McCullough and Robert Malone, back to back, late in 2021, have already been seen by those with an historical eye, as the pivotal point in the rise of the anti-mRNA injection argument from relative obscurity to a substantial audience. And especially, your interview. These two programs nailed down the scientific basis of the opposition to the injections. No one can ever displace Rogan, McCullough and yourself from that credit--and you were the most convincing and important, mostly due to your relaxed demeanor and background in the mRNA world. Dr. Breggin is clearly motivated by jealousy, as shown in his ridiculous attacks against Matthias Desmet, based on a single sentence rather than the whole book. When this all began, Del BIgtree said: "we don't need to all agree, to be on the same side." The ability to accept differences of opinion and background is a sign of maturity--which Jane Ruby clearly lacks. It should also be understood that in a popular movement there are often several prominent voices--in this case, many. Different experiences and voices speak to different people. So continue your good work and try not to be bothered by the insects flying around you.
This. I can’t tell you how much success I had showing people the two Rogan interviews. That was THE turning point.
Thanks for that feedback, Ed. It was pretty obvious, and a few perceptive talking heads have said it, but it is the consensus of many ordinary viewers, such as you and I, that ultimately make it true.
It is curious that Dr Malone, perhaps the most calm spoken credentialled critic of the globalist, receives such extreme flax from those who appear to also be aginst the vaccine, but are so in an extreme emotional way, full of way out of the box ideology that only harms the rational skeptic cause. Thus, by their extremism and poorly supported ideology, they discredit rational skepticism, and also attempt to tear down the most rational skeptics. Hummm, makes one wonder about their motive.
Also the Dark Horse podcast of Weinstein with Malone, that was my first eye ope er.