"The report then confirms, “Vaccine manufacturers have not advertised their vaccines at all"
Luckily billions in taxpayer dollars have been spent to promote COVID jabs with ample claims of safe and effective made by public health tools. Here in NYC they're pushing jabs for kids now.
This is one of the most infuriating parts of this whole thing. The government public "service" announcements are the worst in how they promote a point of view with taxpayer money and immunize (ha ha) the drugmakers from liability at the same time.
Absolutely galling and here in NYC it has been full court press from the outset blanketing the city in signs. We had AloneTogether & HealthcareHeroes & mask mandates then jabs. One of my favorites is the subway series where the unmasked person has the caption "Don't be that person." If you're curious there's a group with mostly pandemic subway shots separate from individual shut down wanderings.
Nobody does blanket advertising like NYC.. makes me hotter than a hornet too!
Most of the "fact-checking" feel computer generated. I suspect they've started using AI algorithms to "fact-check" some segments, if not all, of an article. We're all testers of their software.
Those facts checkers are jokes, most of them just censor based on opinions not knowledge of anything and even worse sometimes it seems they don’t even understood or read what was written.
The irony is that the only possible fact-checking systems already exist: For democracy, it's called public discourse, and for science, it's the open scientific community.
There is no such thing as a closed-system, yet unimpeachable, fact-checker.
The "fact checkers" determined that Joe Biden was not shaking hands with a ghost last week. Rather, he was pointing with his entire hand. This ridiculous conspiracy was debunked by Tucker Carlson within one week.
Goodman’s experience clearly shows something very sinister is behind this world-wide, age-wide push for genetic injections. It’s becoming obvious it goes beyond greed.
Eventually, all of the doubters will catch onto this and we will get some answers. We know what the answer will be. NWO and WEF will go up in flames and Vladimir Putin will become the leader who saved us from global tyranny.
In January, President Biden admitted defeat: "there is no federal solution" to defeat COVID-19 and he conceded he has no plan to get the virus under control. So why continue to push the vaccine? Must be $$$$$
Clearly this fact checker farce is a rampant issue. But the sense of helplessness from the fallout is overwhelming. How do we fight this stuff? Keep doing what we’re doing? Sometimes I feel like we’re fighting a hydra.
As recounted in the New Testament, many Jews in the early 30's believed John the Baptist was the reincarnated Elijah. I'm sure "fact checkers" have debunked the concept of reincarnation; but I can't help but wonder who Elon Musk was 2,000 years ago.
I don’t know who Elon Musk was 2000 years ago, and whether he is a good guy or a bad guy now isn’t yet known to me. I am reading a book by John Scott called “Gods Mountain”. One would have to listen to him and read his book to get any idea whether he is credible, but he did say that the actions of the ruling class before Atlantis was destroyed were so heinous that only now, many millennia later, have some of them been allowed to come back with one last chance to redeem themselves. Those who claim to have channeled or “downloaded” information about Atlantis say it was a technologically advanced society. In any event, Scott says that he was shown that Nikola Tesla was such an individual. Make of this what you will.
There are sources available about Atlantis, Edgar Cayce and more. There is no "scientific" source as the records are gone. It was an atomic reaction...
I've never read anything by Edgar Cayce and I have never spent a moment before today wondering what became of Atlantis. I suspect it was a colonial outpost for space aliens that decided one day to submerge the city and to go on observing and controlling mankind. Who knows?
As always Dr Malone you continue to inform us especially parents with young children about these experimental vaccines and the adverse reactions and consequences. Sad that with so many complicit in hiding the truth and stifling debate on this topic so many parents and citizens remain uninformed. Thank you for work, especially for the world’s children. God bless you and your lovely assistant/wife Dr Jill.
Talk about being kept in the dark! Without reading theses types of articles I would be clueless about the underbelly. The Obama Foundation info is well hidden. Thank you again for insight!
We need to identify and to archive every one of the lying "fact checkers" based on how many false reports and attacks they have made so they will be defendants in inevitable class action lawsuits for instigating the dangerous dissemination of "vaccines", anti-viral drugs and other unnecessary and health-damaging treatments and resources.
The damage to society of Pharma's lying products are incalculable, dividing friends and family, damaging most of the population, costing society untold billions of dollars.
Or diversity picks with good "social skills", ie "nice" people who are "well adjusted" and are willing to believe that it is a wonderful world if we would just all get along and follow the academics who have been toiling away for so long.
If you want truthful people often you will have edgy people who have zero tolerance for deception, abuse or fraud.
The legal site you show by example may provide an excellent review for its content scope, but for it, or any site, to properly earn the label "fact-checker", it would also have to withstand onsite public comment. And, if sufficiently ambitious, also allow perpetually a crowd-sourced revision of baseline content (maybe Wiki-style) to address that commentary.
Yes, of course, but would rather trust a collaborative working group rather than something like Wikipedia where politics rule and on some topics the general public can make revisions. Anything as hot topic as this has to be done right with people who have a 100% record of being honest and are credentialled.
"Yes, of course, but would rather trust a collaborative working group ..."
Then the collaborative working group must itself be "open", that is, with low barrier to entry, and only behavioral controls, never content controls.
"... rather than something like Wikipedia where politics rule and on some topics the general public can make revisions."
Politics rule everything. It is inescapable. If you make it so that "the general public" can't make revisions, you may have won a battle, but you've lost the war. You're doing what the "fact-checkers" do -- censor. Perhaps you didn't notice that Dr. Malone is now relegated to "the general public" in MSM venues -- he has no power.
One understanding that does not seem to recognized very well at all, now deep in the 21st century, is that "ignorant" and "stupid" people ordinarily have a strong incentive to *follow* the more capable -- that is, in a healthy political system. The PRIMARY reason the less-capable rebel is when they are lied to, robbed, used, shunned, and killed. If, for those reasons, they misbehave today, we must always fight speech with speech, and start the long road back to normalcy.
Then you have to have someone to review the contributions to make sure it is well argued and referenced, every single fact like RFK, jrs book. I for one do not believe he wrote that whole book with all the references, it is just too well done for it not to be a collaborative effort. I don't believe in organizational geniuses who alone can create a great work, we've had too many cult leaders.
There are many fallacies that need to be dismissed as unprovable, ingratiating to Pharma, and ludicrous--that those who are getting fully boosted now are fortunate when they just get mild covid because had they not gotten the shots they would be in a hospital with a much worse case. But that is the type of noxious nonsense that media personalities are spouting.
"Then you have to have someone to review the contributions to make sure it is well argued and referenced, every single fact like RFK, jrs book."
Where agreed objective standards can be applied -- e.g., references; formal logic tests (software should be available to do this with natural language, unless it's being patent-controlled by Google ;)-- then, yes, by all means. But otherwise, "well-argued" can be slippery subjectivity.
Dr Malone: Here's something to fact check: An MD on our Board of Health cited an unpublished Commonwealth modeling "study" predicting vaccines saved 2 million lives, as justification for everyone who isn't vaccinated to get vaccinated. I'd love some feedback on this model, this claim seems outlandish. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/blog/2022/impact-us-covid-19-vaccination-efforts-march-update. BTW, this same MD gets agitated when we mention Ivermectin and early treatment could save lives!
Partisan corporate media is the problem here. Not so much that they are partisan - journalists have always been partisan, look at Revolutionary War times for example - but because now one side has so much market power that they can drown out dissenting voices and at the same time claim to be unbiased. It's quintessentially Orwellian.
Corporate media is now just a propaganda arm for the government, even if it's not state controlled.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10741813/CDC-issues-national-alert-mystery-clusters-childhood-hepatitis.html
Oh it's unbelievable that they would harm our CHILDREN
"UK experts believe that weakened immunity from lockdowns plays a role".
Right - it was the lockdowns that weakened their immunity. Everyone knows that lockdowns weaken immunity. Of course it was the lockdown.
It's truly astonishing the lengths to which these people will go to ignore the obvious.
"The report then confirms, “Vaccine manufacturers have not advertised their vaccines at all"
Luckily billions in taxpayer dollars have been spent to promote COVID jabs with ample claims of safe and effective made by public health tools. Here in NYC they're pushing jabs for kids now.
This is one of the most infuriating parts of this whole thing. The government public "service" announcements are the worst in how they promote a point of view with taxpayer money and immunize (ha ha) the drugmakers from liability at the same time.
Absolutely galling and here in NYC it has been full court press from the outset blanketing the city in signs. We had AloneTogether & HealthcareHeroes & mask mandates then jabs. One of my favorites is the subway series where the unmasked person has the caption "Don't be that person." If you're curious there's a group with mostly pandemic subway shots separate from individual shut down wanderings.
Nobody does blanket advertising like NYC.. makes me hotter than a hornet too!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pameladrew/albums/72157717618546553
The tell is that they're fact-checking completely absurd things, such as whether Joe Biden really shook hands with thin air. (Fact check: he did. ✅)
Fact checkers: "We are all conspiracy theorists now." haha!
https://themariachiyears.substack.com/p/when-fact-checkers-become-conspiracy?s=w
Most of the "fact-checking" feel computer generated. I suspect they've started using AI algorithms to "fact-check" some segments, if not all, of an article. We're all testers of their software.
I got a ticket to TakeBackOurFreedom in Jacksonville, FL on Saturday 4/23. I hope you'll be one of the speakers.
No - I was asking, but i have a prior commitment to be in the UK at a conference. Sorry!
Thank you for answering. Sorry I will miss you but you have important work to do wherever you go.
Those facts checkers are jokes, most of them just censor based on opinions not knowledge of anything and even worse sometimes it seems they don’t even understood or read what was written.
They are partisan rebuttals dressed up as "objective".
The irony is that the only possible fact-checking systems already exist: For democracy, it's called public discourse, and for science, it's the open scientific community.
There is no such thing as a closed-system, yet unimpeachable, fact-checker.
They’re probably recent college grad
“consultants.”
What’s the difference between a conspiracy theory and the truth?
about three months on average
Yeah it used to be six months, I think we're coming up to one month.
The "fact checkers" determined that Joe Biden was not shaking hands with a ghost last week. Rather, he was pointing with his entire hand. This ridiculous conspiracy was debunked by Tucker Carlson within one week.
Goodman’s experience clearly shows something very sinister is behind this world-wide, age-wide push for genetic injections. It’s becoming obvious it goes beyond greed.
Eventually, all of the doubters will catch onto this and we will get some answers. We know what the answer will be. NWO and WEF will go up in flames and Vladimir Putin will become the leader who saved us from global tyranny.
we can only hope!!
In January, President Biden admitted defeat: "there is no federal solution" to defeat COVID-19 and he conceded he has no plan to get the virus under control. So why continue to push the vaccine? Must be $$$$$
Clear proof of the lies that they are all telling (as if we need proof). Pfizer is Evil.
Clearly this fact checker farce is a rampant issue. But the sense of helplessness from the fallout is overwhelming. How do we fight this stuff? Keep doing what we’re doing? Sometimes I feel like we’re fighting a hydra.
As recounted in the New Testament, many Jews in the early 30's believed John the Baptist was the reincarnated Elijah. I'm sure "fact checkers" have debunked the concept of reincarnation; but I can't help but wonder who Elon Musk was 2,000 years ago.
I don’t know who Elon Musk was 2000 years ago, and whether he is a good guy or a bad guy now isn’t yet known to me. I am reading a book by John Scott called “Gods Mountain”. One would have to listen to him and read his book to get any idea whether he is credible, but he did say that the actions of the ruling class before Atlantis was destroyed were so heinous that only now, many millennia later, have some of them been allowed to come back with one last chance to redeem themselves. Those who claim to have channeled or “downloaded” information about Atlantis say it was a technologically advanced society. In any event, Scott says that he was shown that Nikola Tesla was such an individual. Make of this what you will.
I suspect that Atlantis was the victim of tectonic plates. Tesla was certainly an "evolved" fellow.
There are sources available about Atlantis, Edgar Cayce and more. There is no "scientific" source as the records are gone. It was an atomic reaction...
I've never read anything by Edgar Cayce and I have never spent a moment before today wondering what became of Atlantis. I suspect it was a colonial outpost for space aliens that decided one day to submerge the city and to go on observing and controlling mankind. Who knows?
Keep nudging back, even in the littlest ways you can.
Every. Single. Day.
As always Dr Malone you continue to inform us especially parents with young children about these experimental vaccines and the adverse reactions and consequences. Sad that with so many complicit in hiding the truth and stifling debate on this topic so many parents and citizens remain uninformed. Thank you for work, especially for the world’s children. God bless you and your lovely assistant/wife Dr Jill.
Talk about being kept in the dark! Without reading theses types of articles I would be clueless about the underbelly. The Obama Foundation info is well hidden. Thank you again for insight!
We need to identify and to archive every one of the lying "fact checkers" based on how many false reports and attacks they have made so they will be defendants in inevitable class action lawsuits for instigating the dangerous dissemination of "vaccines", anti-viral drugs and other unnecessary and health-damaging treatments and resources.
Here is what a real and rigorous law-based fact check looks like: http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html
The damage to society of Pharma's lying products are incalculable, dividing friends and family, damaging most of the population, costing society untold billions of dollars.
that's a heck of a fact check ! Can you imagine Politifact doing that?
Once they started doing something rigorous requiring many citations and back and forth arguments their lies would fall apart.
A real fact-check requires superior intelligence. Politifact only hires otherwise unemployable gender-studies graduates
Or diversity picks with good "social skills", ie "nice" people who are "well adjusted" and are willing to believe that it is a wonderful world if we would just all get along and follow the academics who have been toiling away for so long.
If you want truthful people often you will have edgy people who have zero tolerance for deception, abuse or fraud.
The legal site you show by example may provide an excellent review for its content scope, but for it, or any site, to properly earn the label "fact-checker", it would also have to withstand onsite public comment. And, if sufficiently ambitious, also allow perpetually a crowd-sourced revision of baseline content (maybe Wiki-style) to address that commentary.
Could that be organized for pharma?
Yes, of course, but would rather trust a collaborative working group rather than something like Wikipedia where politics rule and on some topics the general public can make revisions. Anything as hot topic as this has to be done right with people who have a 100% record of being honest and are credentialled.
"Yes, of course, but would rather trust a collaborative working group ..."
Then the collaborative working group must itself be "open", that is, with low barrier to entry, and only behavioral controls, never content controls.
"... rather than something like Wikipedia where politics rule and on some topics the general public can make revisions."
Politics rule everything. It is inescapable. If you make it so that "the general public" can't make revisions, you may have won a battle, but you've lost the war. You're doing what the "fact-checkers" do -- censor. Perhaps you didn't notice that Dr. Malone is now relegated to "the general public" in MSM venues -- he has no power.
One understanding that does not seem to recognized very well at all, now deep in the 21st century, is that "ignorant" and "stupid" people ordinarily have a strong incentive to *follow* the more capable -- that is, in a healthy political system. The PRIMARY reason the less-capable rebel is when they are lied to, robbed, used, shunned, and killed. If, for those reasons, they misbehave today, we must always fight speech with speech, and start the long road back to normalcy.
Then you have to have someone to review the contributions to make sure it is well argued and referenced, every single fact like RFK, jrs book. I for one do not believe he wrote that whole book with all the references, it is just too well done for it not to be a collaborative effort. I don't believe in organizational geniuses who alone can create a great work, we've had too many cult leaders.
There are many fallacies that need to be dismissed as unprovable, ingratiating to Pharma, and ludicrous--that those who are getting fully boosted now are fortunate when they just get mild covid because had they not gotten the shots they would be in a hospital with a much worse case. But that is the type of noxious nonsense that media personalities are spouting.
"Then you have to have someone to review the contributions to make sure it is well argued and referenced, every single fact like RFK, jrs book."
Where agreed objective standards can be applied -- e.g., references; formal logic tests (software should be available to do this with natural language, unless it's being patent-controlled by Google ;)-- then, yes, by all means. But otherwise, "well-argued" can be slippery subjectivity.
"Someone said _____ might be true."
"That's not correct. It's not true."
"I didn't say it was true, I said he said it."
"Yes, but what he said is wrong, therefore you're wrong."
"But he did say it."
"But since it's wrong, he should not have said it and you should not have pointed out he said it. That means you're wrong."
"About what?"
"Everything we disagreee with."
Perfect!
Dr Malone: Here's something to fact check: An MD on our Board of Health cited an unpublished Commonwealth modeling "study" predicting vaccines saved 2 million lives, as justification for everyone who isn't vaccinated to get vaccinated. I'd love some feedback on this model, this claim seems outlandish. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/blog/2022/impact-us-covid-19-vaccination-efforts-march-update. BTW, this same MD gets agitated when we mention Ivermectin and early treatment could save lives!
I found what I think is the model documentation if anyone can help review it https://www.thelancet.com/cms/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00324-8/attachment/155c4296-f806-4ffb-8878-ac3e17706924/mmc1.pdf
Partisan corporate media is the problem here. Not so much that they are partisan - journalists have always been partisan, look at Revolutionary War times for example - but because now one side has so much market power that they can drown out dissenting voices and at the same time claim to be unbiased. It's quintessentially Orwellian.
Corporate media is now just a propaganda arm for the government, even if it's not state controlled.
Both corporate media and the government are propaganda arms for each other.
Or are they both propaganda arms for someone else?
exactly
Well yes, they're being paid to do it.