78 Comments

SCIENCE IS DEAD AND I WASTED 30+ YEARS OF MY LIFE. Sorry for yelling but it is all I can do lately. I am a medical writer and work in clinical research, writing protocols, safety reports, submissions, CSRs, etc. One of my protocols was recently amended to include "at birth" next to sex. One dataset for a DSUR came in with no male and female data. I asked the team what was going on and they had decided to remove sex from the studies because they wanted to be inclusive or some other nonsense. These are SAFETY STUDIES! Males and Females are different biologically, biochemically, and physiologically. How to we assess if there is a sex-specific safety signal if we do not assess male versus female? QT intervals are different for males and females. How do we assess if there is a cardiac signal in one of the sexes without diluting all the results? We won't even know if the normal range is correct. One of our drugs is known to affect hormones and each sex is also affected subjectively. How do you design studies like this without looking at the sexes (TWO of them) separately?? Yesterday, at a CTT, there was a very long discussion about what kinds of birth controls are to be allowed for transexuals. MY HEAD EXPLODED.

Expand full comment

As long as 1 rational thinker still exists there is hope. Others you don't expect will look to you as an example. We must stand in pointing out the facts and truth with a calm tone like Dr Malone.

Expand full comment

Thank you for speaking out Doctor, it is People like you (& Dr Malone) who have the rare (in todays world), combination of Skills AND Courage. The world before us depends on People like YOU to guide the narrative. Again, my Thanks.

Expand full comment

It's not dead. It is being reborn. Decentralize it. Decentralize everything!!

If you haven't yet listen to Balaji Srinivasan's epic 8 hour podcast on Lex Fridman. We need to exit the current system into a new one.

Or read this: https://joshketry.substack.com/p/embrace-decentralized-systems-fear

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 12, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Hell yeah! Well we need to align then! Our biggest positions are

1) Decentralization

2) Transparency in all systems that govern over our lives

3) Using Technology to take back control of our governments

4) Wielding the dangerous power of direct democracies (carefully) to stop the globalist agendas.

Our Substack is free - and always will be. Join the discussion!

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 12, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Welcome! Where can we get that T shirt?

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 12, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Wow that is insane !!! I’m sorry you have to deal with such craziness

Expand full comment

Science is well and implacable; it is just that the government sanctioned "science" is propaganda and BS posing as science, with a malevolent agenda.

Expand full comment

I would prefer to say that science is a combination of the processes of science combined with scientists who conscientiously apply them. The processes remain inviolate. But lately it appears that many scientists have become all-too-human in their vulnerability to the lure of money-driven bias.

Expand full comment

"But lately it appears that many scientists have become all-too-human in their vulnerability"

... and that is precisely when they stopped being scientists :)...

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 13, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

yup - I've quit many a company feeling as though I'd been bent over one too many times.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 12, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I second this notion. Actually, this is a fantastic idea. It should be required training for ALL biology deniers...it'll be like the retraining they are trying to require for Jordan Peterson, but different. In fact, MAYBE Jordan will reconsider doing a little social media brush up, if ALL the biology deniers (including Trudouche) agree to milk a bull.

**I kindly request the bull milking event to be video recorded.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 12, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I believe I saw it there as well, but was very apropos here. Nicely done.

Expand full comment

OLD NEWS. Pronouns, Biology, Math...Nothing is going to matter if we continue to allow DISTRACTION on the trees instead of the whole FOREST. The endless yap, yap, yapping is yet MORE DISTRACTION FROM WHAT'S IMPORTANT.

THE WHOLE NORTH AMERICAN CONTINENT is being gradually, methodically SURROUNDED, and INFILTRATED FOR OCCUPATION BY ENEMIES. THAT IS WHAT'S IMPORTANT!!!

Since elections are an open Charade...And, they're upheld as relevant by a CORRUPT GASLIGHTING JUDICIARY, the awake and sane alert to the imminent and immediate DANGER have every right to DEMAND THE ENEMY LEAVE. As elections are openly fraudulent/cheat events, a majority or consensus is NO LONGER RELEVANT. The Founding Fathers didn't wait for a majority or consensus before standing to fight when ENOUGH WAS ENOUGH.

Enough TALK AND A LOT MORE ACTION. Adult, healthy men and women KNOW WHEN IT'S TIME FOR ENOUGH TO BE ENOUGH.

Expand full comment

In fact, one of our foundational documents suggests we now have a solemn DUTY to throw off our government as it currently stands. The following words are taken directly from the Declaration of Independence:

"... whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends [i.e., unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness], it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

"... But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, IT IS THEIR DUTY, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

I think it has become very obvious in the last three years that the ruling elites are destroying our unalienable rights of:

* Life -- there have been many unnecessary covid deaths,

* Liberty -- the imposition of vaccination and lockdown mandates, and

* Happiness -- we're being bombarded with constant mass media fear propaganda.

This has been building in "a long train of abuses and usurpations". In other words, democratic representation has increasingly been replaced by tyrannical oligarchic rule for decades now, and the level of brazen tyranny has been building. Could our duty be any more obvious?

Expand full comment

As we get deeper into living in this 1984 world, we get further and further down this 1984 quote:

------------------------------------

“How does one man assert his power over another, Winston?“

Winston thought. “By making him suffer”, he said.

“Exactly. By making him suffer. Obedience is not enough. Unless he is suffering, how can you be sure that he is obeying your will and not his own? Power is in inflicting pain and humiliation. Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing. Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery is torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but MORE merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress towards more pain. The old civilizations claimed that they were founded on love or justice. Ours is founded upon hatred. In our world there will be no emotions except fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement. Everything else we shall destroy – everything.

Already we are breaking down the habits of thought which have survived from before the Revolution. We have cut the links between child and parent, and between man and man, and between man and woman. No one dares trust a wife or a child or a friend any longer. <-- WE ARE HERE

But in the future there will be no wives and no friends. Children will be taken from their mothers at birth, as one takes eggs from a hen. The sex instinct will be eradicated. Procreation will be an annual formality like the renewal of a ration card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are at work upon it now. There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother. <-- THIS IS THE PLAN

Expand full comment

The solution is to use the dangerous power of "tyranny of the masses" problem found in Direct Democracy and point it back at the heads of the Globalists.

Like this:

https://joshketry.substack.com/p/worried-about-voter-fraud-lets-build

Expand full comment

Great connecting piece of the book. Amazingly Orwell would probably have a hard time thinking that a group of people in government could start butchering childrens genitals in this dystopian world we are living in. But in the same breath make a saint out of a man that would put a cage around a beagles head and let flees eat into their brains (Faucci). Can you picture the view praising Faucci?

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 12, 2023Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Agreed ... and the transex ideology is a way of " proving" to those w/out Belief that " How can your so-called deity not even get the sex correct in His favorite organism?"... Hence, God is myth.

This is all foretold

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 12, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Yes, they did get it rather well in Revelations. They looked at the future and described in their own thought terms/language what they were seeing. Then said: and God will not be mocked and you just wait and see what HE will do. And HE is getting to Smite all of Humanity. Not quite yet, but... after the suffering REALLY ramps up...

Expand full comment

The jabs and all other forms of similar control.

Expand full comment

Totalitarian policies, a combination of facism and communism (as Hitler, said, there was very little difference between the two), where Malthusian eugenicists take over all parts of society and decide who lives and who dies, and when, and how they live their lives, or better said, existences. The Wuhan virus was a bioweapon developed by the Chinese in a lab built by the French, funded by Americans, and released, like the Asian flu in the late '50s, on the world, and spread by propaganda and hysterics. But the mRNA injections are the true bioweapon, which will kill millions, some immediately, most as time goes on, plus will destroy the fertility in almost everyone who is injected. I pray the Africans continue to resist the WEF and their allied eugenicists. The Chinese don't allow these products in their country, but they make them for everyone else. That tells you much about what the goal is for them.

Danny Huckabee

Expand full comment

Why is the "T" included with the LGBQ+? It is not logically the same.

LGBQ is about who you choose to love.

"T" is about not loving yourself enough the way you are right now, and wanting to change that.

The reason this is dangerous for teenagers is because most teenagers do not know how to love themselves yet. Many even hate themselves, and nearly all are at the very least confused. Offering them a seductively quick way to fix this can lead to permanent damage. This is why we don't let them change their bodies in other ways - tattoos, piercings, etc until they are at least 18.

On the flipside we should be empathic and have an understanding space for confused teenagers to talk and be accepted.

But the most marginalized group here isn't the teenage girl who genuinely feels trapped in the wrong body. The most marginalized group here is the young person who was tricked into thinking this change would fix their confusion, exclusion, or depression and now has made permanent changes to their body as a result.

Who is the voice for them?

Now that we know the problems, let's talk solutions. The solution is to use the dangerous power of "tyranny of the masses" problem found in Direct Democracy and point it back at the heads of the Globalists.

Like this:

https://joshketry.substack.com/p/worried-about-voter-fraud-lets-build https://joshketry.substack.com/p/worried-about-voter-fraud-lets-build

Expand full comment

Well said!

Expand full comment

The ginger chick w/ the backward hat is trying to look under the teacher's desk ... time to titrate the Lupron

Expand full comment

I really wish George Orwell was alive. I consider 1984 the liberal playbook for the previous decade or so. This deviance being used on children now goes way beyond what some of the biggest mass murderers in history could have ever imagined. Most historical writers and artists would be horrified over the complete breakdown of human decency and the moral decay of how children and their parents are treated in America. This country is having a complete moral breakdown and with that I fear what once was one of our biggest protectors will be gone, GOD!!! They have tried to remove GOD, and with this new push to corrupt, sexualize, and dumb down our children they may succeed if we don’t have a major push back. J.Goodrich

Expand full comment

Moral decay ... just like Ancient Rome. And look what happened there.

Expand full comment

Fabulous article.

Expand full comment

While filling medical records we used to have just one question related to sex: male or female?

Recently signing for MyChart ...there were three:

1. Sex identification, M,F, Trnasgender other ..

2. Sex asigned at birth

3. Sexual orientation

Really? Of course the option of "prefer not to disclose is there" but THAT option is itself informative for the "eye of Sauron" It's so awful...

Expand full comment

I was not a science major in college, but I loved physics for non-math majors. Actual science is fascinating. However, I never required a science class to understand the physical difference between myself and my brothers, I changed their diapers. I liked racing car sets and legos… I also liked my barbies, mostly for fashion purposes. My brothers liked bashing each other and pushing each other off dirt piles. Go figure.

Expand full comment

"It seems rather obvious to me that this is a direct attack on future generations of American citizens, to take down America- as well as the entire western world, without firing a single missile"

Exhibit #1: https://jrnyquist.blog/2019/09/11/the-secret-speech-of-general-chi-haotian/

20 yrs ago, General Haotian laid it all out.

You are correct, Dr Malone, "without firing a missile."

Expand full comment

Thank you for this link on a secret speech which mostly shows the boasting and pipedreams of an old man. Of interest is the statement by witness Mr. He Xin on page 25. He speaks of a conference initiated by the Mikhail Sergeevich Gorbachev Foundation and funded by the United States on Sept. 27th to Oct 1st 1995 at the San Francisco Fairmont hotel. 500 of the world's most important statesmen, economic leaders and scientists, including George W. Bush (president in waiting), Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair, Zbigniew Brzezinski, as well as George Soros, Bill Gates and futurist John Naisbitt gathered at this conference.

The topic of discussion was 'The problem about globalization and how to guide humanity to move forward into the 21st century'. According to Mr. He Xin these 'people of the world' in attendance thought that in the 21st century a mere 20 % of the world's population will be sufficient to maintain the world's economy and prosperity, whereas the other 80 % (or 4/5th) of the world's population will be 'human garbage' unable to produce new values. The people in attendance thought that this excess 80 % population would be trash-population and 'high-tech' means' should be used to eliminate them gradually.

This shocking conspiracy could also be regarded as a pipedream of those 500 IF WE WERE NOT LIVING IN IT RIGHT NOW 25 years later.

Sasha Latypova 'evidendence of the conspiracy to commit mass murder by the DOD,HHS' in forbiddenknowledgetv

Expand full comment

actually, Gerda. . . I am ashamed to say I was incapable of reading the entirety of this blog. It was simply too mind-bending, too painful, too unnerving to realize after reading only bits and pieces and getting the main idea that our OWN country's CIA and intelligence bureaucracy must CERTAINLY be aware of this and yet failed, with 20 yrs advance knowledge of the plan, to even limit the damage.

Of course, if they were in on it, they had no motivation at all to do so. I could vomit.

Expand full comment

This is a subject that just breaks my heart. Not just for the children who will be maimed for life but for the people who are SO delusional that they think this is proper and that multiple genders is a real thing. It boggles the mind too.

Expand full comment

My input: A Table contained in a Memorandum to Bernard Berelson (President, Population Council) found in “Activities Relevant to the Study of Population Policy for the U.S.” March 11, 1969 by Frederick S. Jaffe (as the time Executive Director of Planned Parenthood’s Center for Family Planning Program Development). Note that Gates Sr. was a board member of Planned Parenthood for years and even funded its Seattle facility decades ago. As you will read, a few of these measures were not carried out by Congress but society has moved forward on many of them. Mr. Jaffe was President of The Alan Guttmacher Institute. This seems long but its just the table within a 9 page doc.

Table 1. Proposed measures to Reduce U.S. Fertility, by Universality or Selectivity of Impact in the U.S.

Universal Impact

Social Constraints

RESTRUCTURE FAMILY:

a) Postpone or avoid marriage

b) Alter image of ideal family size

Compulsory education of children

Encourage Increased homosexuality

Educate for family limitation

Fertility control agents in water supply

Encourage women to work

ECONOMIC DETERRENTS/INCENTIVES

Modify tax polices:

a) Substantial marriage tax

b) Child tax

c) Tax married more than single

d) Remove parents tax exemption

e) Additional taxes on parents with more than 1 or 2 children in school

Reduce/eliminate paid maternity leave or benefits

Reduce/eliminate children’s or family allowances

Bonuses for delayed marriage and greater child-spacing

Pensions for women of 45 with less than N children

Eliminate Welfare payments after first 2 children

Chronic Depression

Require women to work and provide few childcare facilities

Limit/eliminate public financed medical care, scholarships,

Housing, loans and subsidies to families with more than N children

SOCIAL CONTROLS

Compulsory abortion of out-of-wedlock pregnancies

Compulsory sterilization of all who have two children except for a few who would be allowed three

Confine childbearing to only a limited number of adults

Stock certificates permits for children

Housing Policies:

a) Discouragement of private home ownership

b) Stop awarding public housing based on family size

MEASURES PREDICATED ON EXISTING MOTIVATION TO PREVENT UNWANTED PREGNANCY

Payments to encourage sterilization

Payments to encourage contraception

Payments to encourage abortion

Abortion and sterilization on demand

Allow harmless contraceptives to be distributed nonmedically

Improve contraceptive technology

Make contraception truly available and accessible

Improve maternal health care with family planning as a core element

These measures are derived primarily from Davis, Science 11/10/67; Michael Young’s remarks at NIH Conference 6/67; L.&A. Day, Too Many Americans; J. Blake in Shes & Ridley, Public Health & Population Changes; and W Shockley, Speech in Ontario, 12/67.

Expand full comment

We need to fight like hell. This must stop!

Expand full comment

❤️ 🤣 the photos of you in the classroom! 👍 almost better than your Friday Funnies.

Expand full comment

I think I read maybe two somewhat hopeful responses. Without a vision that is spiritual in its outlook, we will end up being what we envision, and I'm not talking Jesus coming back with vengeance and blood on his robe. (hopeful thinking for the hateful and violent). How can anyone lift up this mess without a higher perspective?

Expand full comment

The tik-tok issue is important. We all though that USA kids are poor performers versus Asiatics, with the Chinese IQ slightly higher than ours.

But it is obvious that Tik-Tok, US version is far inferior than Chinese version in producing disciplined citizens.

We do not want to be China! 'Way too controlled! But we have abandoned all those conditions that produce an able citizenry over here. When is the last time you heard that you GranKids were place on restriction? Ha!

But I have watched families in China, and they were "happy," and loved their kids. There has got to be a way over here to love kids and still inspire them to excellence.......permissiveness is not it.

Expand full comment