Yes, I am reading it myself, Kindle version. The biggest take away so far (1st 100 pg) is that ALL the child vaccines, yes(!) ALL, have been tested against NO, as in zero, inert placebo's. They have used the strategy for decades to compare updated vaccines to older ones(instead of placebos) and show the relative difference in adverse …
Yes, I am reading it myself, Kindle version. The biggest take away so far (1st 100 pg) is that ALL the child vaccines, yes(!) ALL, have been tested against NO, as in zero, inert placebo's. They have used the strategy for decades to compare updated vaccines to older ones(instead of placebos) and show the relative difference in adverse effects and deaths, rather than the absolute difference compared to an inert alternative. The original vaccines were never compared to placebos, so they started out based on zip.
This is statistical malpractice a Stats 101 student in experimental design would catch, yet, our renowned scientists at the CDC, FDA, and NIH use it to obfuscate and deceive.
Yes, I am reading it myself, Kindle version. The biggest take away so far (1st 100 pg) is that ALL the child vaccines, yes(!) ALL, have been tested against NO, as in zero, inert placebo's. They have used the strategy for decades to compare updated vaccines to older ones(instead of placebos) and show the relative difference in adverse effects and deaths, rather than the absolute difference compared to an inert alternative. The original vaccines were never compared to placebos, so they started out based on zip.
This is statistical malpractice a Stats 101 student in experimental design would catch, yet, our renowned scientists at the CDC, FDA, and NIH use it to obfuscate and deceive.
Turtles upon turtles upon Turtles.
All these institutions should remove the word "Health" from their names and replace it with "Pharma Profit Margin".