90 Comments

Literally every election "reform" implemented by Democrats has resulted in a process that is more subject to fraud, less verifiable, and less trust worthy.

Which is what they intended...

Expand full comment

Yes, it was to ensure voter access for the downtrodden. Now WE seem to be the downtrodden.

Expand full comment

Or so it appears. 😞

Expand full comment

If someone or something is not to be questioned, then it is most likely bullshit.

Expand full comment

This is all so upsetting. Is there any Democrat out there that could read this and see what is at stake or think it is valid? I had a conversation with A Democrat friend yesterday and frankly, she wouldn’t believe of word, despite the links and proof. Instead, she is beside herself about how Trump says such appalling things, like “put Liz Cheney in front of a firing squad.” I kid you not. And quickly showing her she was falling for a lie simply resulted in one more friendship biting the dust. This is all so upsetting.

Expand full comment

Can’t fix stupid and I choose to surround myself with free thinking individuals, not sheep.

Expand full comment

Michael, it is funny 😁 that you're making a comment about sheep.

Here in South Texas, I saw a yard sign that had a flock of sheep and read: Sheep 🐑 for Harris Walz

Go figure 🤔 🙄!

Expand full comment

This friend was probably not good for your mental and emotional health.

Expand full comment

Kim, sometimes I am amazed at what I hear until some of my relatives say: Well Trump wants to be a dictator 🙄 !?!

It makes my head explode 🤯 💥 😫

Lol 😆 🤣 😂 😹!

Expand full comment

I'm STILL amazed that there are those who think that, even if he entertained such a ridiculous notion (which I DO NOT believe) that he would be able to pull it off with the stellar Team of FREEDOM LOVING people who now surround him and are campaigning for him as our next President. Add to that the "chorus of stellar voices" that have joined from all sides to expose the Democrat agenda, and a bid for anyone wanting to be a "dictator" would never succeed❗️

Expand full comment

Rita, it just goes to prove what we've been saying for years!!!!

EVERY SINGLE STORY that the Lame Stream Media has PROMOTED has been clipped and abbreviated to suit their narrative.

Expand full comment

I am SO sorry to hear that your friendship suffered because of POLITICS. 😔 I, too, suffered this same fate with three of (what I considered) my closest friends in 2020. I was blindsided and deeply hurt by this unbelievable turn of events and became a very active Member of BRAVER ANGELS (braver angels.org). My involvement was the very thing that helped to restore my faith in human beings.

I feel as though I still have emotional scars from this experience, but God continues to uphold me and affirm that my personal Character and Priorities are in the right place.

I refuse to judge as I have been judged and still believe in my RIGHT and DUTY as an American Citizen to vote MY CONSCIENCE without undue coercion or judgement by those who do not hold my same perspective.

"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Expand full comment

Just as a side not - I think the link you put in goes to a different website than the one you intended.

Expand full comment

I’ll double check that link, Kim. Thanks sir calling it to my attention!

Expand full comment

That’s what happens when there’s an UNINTENTIONAL space between “braver” and “angels”! 😬

Expand full comment

My own experience says you lost nothing. Their so-called friendship was conditional. For me the word friendship, like the word love, is a verb. Not a noun.

Expand full comment

I TOTALLY agree with your definition of “love”, Red green❣️

Thank you. 💕

Expand full comment

God bless you and yours.

Expand full comment

Great stack Doc! Praying hard for a big win tomorrow for MAGA and MAHA! And for America! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

Expand full comment

Very well said! Censorship is the most important issue of the day, with election integrity close behind! Shared!

Expand full comment

There is no justification for mail-in ballots or multiple day voting. Covid threat is minimal now. More time equals more fraud.

Expand full comment

A couple times, before Covid, circumstances forced me to do mail in ballots. I was really frosted when we were advised they wouldn't be bothering with the mail- in ballots as they weren't needed.

Expand full comment

…and now, they count them first. 🤔

Expand full comment

WHAT⁉️ Something else I was unaware of! During which Election was this❓

Expand full comment
Nov 5Edited

Ballot counting foregone? Probably the late 80ties or early nineties. I've early voted ever since, so haven't been following it since

Expand full comment

The Biden administration and the democrats party have set up the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics. Just listen to him in his own words. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGRnhBmHYN0

A scary fact is the Biden administration sued Virginia to keep non citizen voters on the voting roles and won in two lower courts. The supreme court ruled Virginia has the right to remove them. This should have been a 9 to zero ruling but the three radical liberal justices voted to leave the non citizens on the roles, amazing.

Trump at a rally last night said if he looses he will be going to jail for the rest of his life. He’s right. So he is fighting for his freedom. The difference for the democrats is hundreds of them are fighting to stay out of prison, I believe this is why they are so desperate. So many of them have committed federal crimes against their oath to uphold the constitution and also treason.

Expand full comment

Yes, the video. Very funny.

Expand full comment

Remember it well, James; thanks for the link!

Expand full comment

Why has voting become so touchy?

Harris’ and Elias’ efforts to block proper legal actions to challenge election practices seems unAmerican. They want to set things up the way they want them and then close the barn door behind them. Is Harris capable of understanding the consitutionality of this practice? Does she care?

I certainly do not want her involved in such deviousness.

Walz’s version of free speech seems to extend only so far as his own beliefs. I can only hope his political career is DOA.

Expand full comment

I believe Wisconsin was also the state that had 100% participation of every nursing home resident - which is ludicrous on its face and clear evidence of fraud, IMHO!

Here in Washington state, my mother was in a Memory Care Facility, where the majority of residents were in the end stages of dementia. She passed away in early 2020, but about a week before the 2018 midterms, I saw the head nurse with a stack of completed ballots on her desk. When I pointed to them she laughed, and remarked that she "always helped" her residents to vote!

Thankfully, my mother's mail came to my house, but I wonder how many other people at the facility voted without their families' knowledge or permission? I would have reported it, but I could not see the names on the ballots and did not have contact info for any family members of the other residents.

I strongly suspect this goes on in almost every blue state in the country, and possibly even in some red ones!

Expand full comment

Here, with the mobile incompetents, they bussed them to the polling places and aids took them by the hand, took them in, assisted them in voting and then returned them to their facilities.

Expand full comment

Why are people who can't understand what they are doing allowed to vote?

Expand full comment

My guess is that the vote that's being created is for Democrats. This state is as much a Democrat stronghold as California and Chicago. Certainly as crooked as Chicago.

Expand full comment

Yeah, I assume that also. It's just incredible that someone who can't clearly indicate their preference can be influenced by a single assistance without witnesses (say one from each party) ensuring there is no influence. Secret ballot!, one might argue? But it's no longer secret if you have a assistant helping you cast it.

Expand full comment

That WOULD BE very concerning!

Expand full comment

Why is it that it’s okay for Democrats and Never-Trumpers to question the legitimacy and legality of elections, but it’s not okay for those that disagree with them to do the same?

Expand full comment

AUSTIN – Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the Biden-Harris Administration and the U.S. Department of Justice for dispatching federal agents to “monitor” Texas elections without any legal authority and in violation of State law.

On November 1, just four days before Election Day, DOJ announced that it would specifically target polling locations and central count locations in eight Texas counties, including Atascosa, Bexar, Dallas, Frio, Harris, Hays, Palo Pinto, and Waller. However, no federal statute authorizes the Biden-Harris Administration to dispatch federal agents to “monitor” State elections when they are prohibited by State laws.

Following DOJ’s announcement, the Texas Secretary of State issued a letter saying, “Texas law is clear: Justice Department monitors are not permitted inside a polling place where ballots are being cast or a central counting station where ballots are being counted. As to the polling place, Section 61.001 of the Texas Election Code identifies those persons who may be lawfully present on election day; federal inspectors are not included in the enumerated list.… Nor are federal inspectors specified in the list of persons permitted in the central counting station while ballots are being counted.”

Now, Attorney General Paxton has sued DOJ for unlawfully sending federal agents to State polling and counting locations.

“The Biden-Harris Administration’s lawless intimidation campaign infringes on States’ constitutional authority to run free and fair elections,” said Attorney General Paxton. “Texas will not be intimidated and I will make every effort to prevent weaponized federal agencies from interfering in our elections.”

Expand full comment

On would think the duly "elected" Sheriff's in the 8 Counties you cite, Michael, ARE the "law" and can 'escort' ANY federal "justice" department interlopers the the county lines and suggest they not return or else face jail time.

Expand full comment

Hmmmmmm 🤔 I'd love to know if that would be recognized as legal?

Expand full comment

Thank God for those Officials taking care of their States Rights!

Expand full comment

As a follow up

AUSTIN – The U.S. Department of Justice agreed last night not to enter Texas polling and central count locations or otherwise interfere with the administration of Texas elections just hours after Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the DOJ over its announcement that it would send federal agents to "monitor" Texas elections.

On November 1, just four days before Election Day, DOJ announced that it would deploy federal election “monitors” to eight Texas counties, including Atascosa, Bexar, Dallas, Frio, Harris, Hays, Palo Pinto, and Waller. The Texas Secretary of State immediately notified DOJ that Texas law does not permit federal “monitors” inside a polling place or central counting station. On November 4, Attorney General Paxton sued DOJ and federal officials, noting no federal statute authorizes the Biden-Harris Administration to dispatch federal agents to “monitor” State elections when they are prohibited by State laws.

Following Attorney General Paxton’s lawsuit and request for a temporary restraining order, DOJ reversed course and agreed to abide by Texas election law. Per the agreement, all DOJ “monitors” will remain outside of polling and central count locations, abide by Texas laws governing conduct within 100 feet of those locations, and refrain from interfering with any voters attempting to cast ballots. Further, a federal judge ordered the Biden-Harris Administration to confirm that no “monitors” will be present at Texas polling locations or enter tabulation centers in violation of Texas law. Election administrators and members of the public should immediately report any violations of this agreement to appropriate local election officials and to the Office of the Attorney General at illegalvoting@oag.texas.gov. Texas’s lawsuit against the DOJ will remain pending until the conclusion of the election to ensure DOJ’s compliance.

“Texans run Texas elections, and we will not be bullied by the Department of Justice,” said Attorney General Paxton. “The DOJ knows it has no authority to monitor Texas elections and backed down when Texas stood up for the rule of law. No federal agent will be

Expand full comment

Monitors, schmonitors. ATF? Armed IRS? Box carriers? Bus drivers? Way to go, Paxton!

Expand full comment

The ONLY reason why anyone would be opposed to making it harder to vote fraudulently, is because they want it to be easier to cheat.

Expand full comment

It does seem confusing, doesn't it⁉️ I'm still willing to have it explained to me to make sure there is something that I'm not missing.

So far, there are no forthcoming explanations that help me understand. Anyone here like to take a shot at it?

Expand full comment

All my thoughts and prayers are with you and the entire American people for tomorrow’s election day… I really hope for “to big to rig“!! Here in Austria it‘s a disaster… Freedom and Democracy won the election quite clear by the right-wing (not at all right-extrem) freedom party (with which the peoples party has more in common than with the social party or the greens) but are prevented from forming a government… the peoples party’s current leader Karl Nehammer (who followed Sebastian Kurz as Chancellor in Austria which means he has never been elected) lost significant votes in the recent election but is now the one negotiating with the lefties to form a new government and ruin the country further… So, Trump winning the elections would also have crucial impact on us!

BTW: You will remember that Sebastian Kurz was kicked as chancellor. He is a WEF Young global leader, but was made to resign as chancellor by accusing him of several offences (which have never been confirmed btw) just to introduce the general C vaccine mandate (because obviously he did not agree to the mandate). Later he went to work for Peter Thiel and recently he founded a company with 2 guys close to the oil industry and Putin… I heard that Peter Thiel is supporting Trump over Harris of which I am not sure whether this is true or not. However, even if this is just opportunistic, it’s ok with me…

All the best,

Bettina

Expand full comment

Thank you, Bettina❣️

Your concern is GREATY APPRECIATED! Thoughts and prayers for you and your country, too! 🙏💕

Expand full comment

Thank you Dr. Malone. Praying for God’s will to be done 🙏🏻

Expand full comment

OR OMISSION!!!

This is ANOTHER HUGE LIE AND ELECTION INTERFERENCE BY THE BIDEN-HARRIS REGIME to keep this information from SENIORS UNTIL AFTER THE ELECTION ‼️‼️‼️

👹🤬👺

Let ALL OF THE SENIORS WHO YOU KNOW

about this TRAVESTY‼️‼️‼️

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/biden-harris-administration-spent-big-tamp-down-medicare-prices-right

Expand full comment

Retired people have received notice Medicare is going up and the supplemental insurance is going up and the supplemental medicine insurance is going up. As for the news about this--crickets.

Expand full comment

Yes, part of the Inflation Reduction Act. As a health insurance broker working in the Medicare niche, I am having to have some serious conversations with some of my clients. Someone joked to me that whatever Congress names a bill, it probably is going to do just the opposite.

Expand full comment

Hmmm.

I haven't had anyone of my friends say that they received notices about any rate increases.

Expand full comment

They always announce a raise in October then take a bigger chunk in January for medicare. We have to pay extra to get supplemental insurance because medicare only pays what it wants, usually only pennies on the dollar of a medical bill. Which is why many doctors don't want to take on medicare patients.

Expand full comment

Thank you for this information!

Expand full comment

Thank you for this painstaking review! Without question, your analysis well documents your conclusion.

Several years back now, I closely followed our state legislative process. Each year, the Democrats reliably offered (and passed) legislation designed to weaken election processes. Then, one adds in the characters of the candidates. Our major party Senate candidates evidence beliefs, when it comes to financially benefiting themselves, that they are convinced relevant laws/regs do not apply to them.

I greatly appreciate the advice our Republican party offers this time - accomplish a vote so overwhelming victory can not be denied. Should that work, perhaps remedies tightening the processes can be added to our lists for reform.

Wishing you an outstanding participation, as part of the directly involved experience. Hoping for successful outcomes!

You, Good Doctors, are ever appreciated!

Expand full comment