Are the Ds trying to upset people? I was particularly disgusted with Sanchez and Wasserman Schultz, who was the worst.
(Just a side note, and I rarely comment on peoples appearances, but, my goodness, all that frizz tamer she is putting in her hair is making her go bald, someone tell her)
Are the Ds trying to upset people? I was particularly disgusted with Sanchez and Wasserman Schultz, who was the worst.
(Just a side note, and I rarely comment on peoples appearances, but, my goodness, all that frizz tamer she is putting in her hair is making her go bald, someone tell her)
The insistence to cancel Kennedy as a witness, the moral impunity the Ds embrace, the interrupting, the clear and consistent violation of the rules, why? Oh, because they are on the moral side now right.
"I take issue with that question"
I've been seeing that a lot, Ms. Wiley.
I just ran into this type of reasoning on my recent family get together. Apparently, I do something called, "begging the question".
But when you look it up, what that means, it doesn't mean what I was doing. There is the real definition, "is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion."
And then there is the common usage, "The phrase "begs the question" is also commonly used to mean "prompts a question" or "raises a question".
I did the latter, which is basically the Socratic method, keep asking.
But I was accused of doing the former! These rhetorical tricks taught and bred into the left these days are the reeds of destruction, because they are all wrapped up in a moral sentiment, in the exact kind of moral sentiment that allows people to commit atrocities.
The performative ignorance in the display, the nah nah nah finger in the ears approach is disgusting and despicable.
I am going to go chop some wood. I have to burn this off.
[Edits for typos and punctuation, natural pause rule is not a real comma rule]
We heated a 3200 square foot house with solely a wood burning furnace… I had 16 cords, at least, on hand. Dang, I miss that. And Yes, I wear kevlar chaps, eye and ear protection🔥🏴☠️, Ed
Edit- The Very Best beer of my life was at the end of those days. I get my big saw back next Tuesday. I am going to use it to saw up a samsung refrigerator and drop it on their service center doorstep🤣.
This form of dialog has become its own linguistic art form. I think they are taught it. I remember the nonsensical things Obama used to say. After a huge shift in Congress, he said I still have things I must do. I heard all of you that didn't vote. He was good at retorting with a strawman flushing any idea of a dialog down the toilet. Their best word play is to start with an accusation so you must answer that before any dialog can happen.
I did it, I watched the whole thing.
Are the Ds trying to upset people? I was particularly disgusted with Sanchez and Wasserman Schultz, who was the worst.
(Just a side note, and I rarely comment on peoples appearances, but, my goodness, all that frizz tamer she is putting in her hair is making her go bald, someone tell her)
The insistence to cancel Kennedy as a witness, the moral impunity the Ds embrace, the interrupting, the clear and consistent violation of the rules, why? Oh, because they are on the moral side now right.
"I take issue with that question"
I've been seeing that a lot, Ms. Wiley.
I just ran into this type of reasoning on my recent family get together. Apparently, I do something called, "begging the question".
But when you look it up, what that means, it doesn't mean what I was doing. There is the real definition, "is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion."
And then there is the common usage, "The phrase "begs the question" is also commonly used to mean "prompts a question" or "raises a question".
I did the latter, which is basically the Socratic method, keep asking.
But I was accused of doing the former! These rhetorical tricks taught and bred into the left these days are the reeds of destruction, because they are all wrapped up in a moral sentiment, in the exact kind of moral sentiment that allows people to commit atrocities.
The performative ignorance in the display, the nah nah nah finger in the ears approach is disgusting and despicable.
I am going to go chop some wood. I have to burn this off.
[Edits for typos and punctuation, natural pause rule is not a real comma rule]
I’ve chopped wood for the last two days and still have lots more to do 🥱
We heated a 3200 square foot house with solely a wood burning furnace… I had 16 cords, at least, on hand. Dang, I miss that. And Yes, I wear kevlar chaps, eye and ear protection🔥🏴☠️, Ed
Edit- The Very Best beer of my life was at the end of those days. I get my big saw back next Tuesday. I am going to use it to saw up a samsung refrigerator and drop it on their service center doorstep🤣.
This form of dialog has become its own linguistic art form. I think they are taught it. I remember the nonsensical things Obama used to say. After a huge shift in Congress, he said I still have things I must do. I heard all of you that didn't vote. He was good at retorting with a strawman flushing any idea of a dialog down the toilet. Their best word play is to start with an accusation so you must answer that before any dialog can happen.