76 Comments

the 3 judges who also don't do their job should also be dismissed, just like the almost entire Congress. And probably most of the so called representatives as well

Expand full comment

it is a shame we have 3 rabid rodents on SCOTUS, who are to stupid to know what a women is

Expand full comment

Ask me my opinion of a senate that put her there

Expand full comment

at the time, I don't think cocaine mitch could have stopped the rabid rodents,

the dims did create the nuclear option, and we did get 3 mostly conservative judges, using that,

however, I think I have an idea what your opinion is of the most useless group of repubs we have seen since 2017, 2018,

Expand full comment
Jun 29·edited Jun 29

Mitch is feeding the rodents chinese cheese

(Was)

Expand full comment

And 3 more that don't have the common sense to read, understand and legislate the Constitution as it is written. IMO, the Constitution is NOT an instrument for interpretation, political bias, or pressure.

It's the "interpretations" and there consequences that has brought America to it's knees.

Expand full comment

absolutely, the founding fathers are way smarter than todays idiot politicians, and they wrote a USC to protect us from people, and "people" are just as evil and nasty and perverted as when the democrats owned slaves,

Expand full comment

Well said.

Expand full comment

Quote of the day, winner.

Expand full comment

it is worse than you think

Democrat Plantations

Historic, and todays Democrats

Prior to 1860, Democrats worked hard to keep their slaves ignorant, pregnant, and on the plantation. While they did not overtly separate black families, they did separate them anytime it was expedient for profit.

During the Democrats Jim Crow KKK years, miraculously, the black families actually grew and prospered despite the systemic racism the Democrats had placed into law. Blacks were getting better educations, despite the Democrats segregation. There was only about a 20 percent single parent population in the black community. Even under the Democrats Jim Crow, the black populations in prison were much lower

Then the Republicans stopped the Democrats Jim Crow, and eventually made the Democrats Klan ineffective at harming or violating the black population.

Then LBJ (another democrat) created the welfare state . From 1968, to now, the black prison population has tripled. The Democrats complain about racial disparity in our prisons. Almost all of those blacks were put in prisons in a democrat-controlled city, by a democrat DA. Tragically, today, these same dmeocrats release black democrat thugs back into the popularion, where they slaughter fellow blacks in increasing numbers.

The single parent numbers in black families is now 70 percent, and the biggest indicator of poverty or incarceration is being raised in a single parent family.

The democrats complain that our schools are failing the black students. The Democrats control, and have for the past 40 years, controlled most of the public schools in these cities.

The black population was increasing under the Democrats Jim Crow laws, yet after forty years of Democrat coontrol, it is shrinking.

The Democrats Klan lynched approx. 3500 blacks over 100 years. The Klan is very proud of Klanned Parenthood, who have lynched over 20 million black babies, in the womb, and got the mothers to help. Now these vermin chop up the healthy body parts of mentally ill children that escape the lynching's.

Democrats have not changed much since their KKK/Jim Crow days. They just got more evil. Today their Plantations are called, Chicago, Portland, Atlanta, NYC, etc.

And the leftist propaganda machine, IE mainstream news, is just lying to so many gullible idiots, that this will probably get worse before it gets better.

Expand full comment
Jun 28Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS

Thanks for the explanation.

Next up: Citizens United. Corporations aren't people, but they sure can be psychopathic. "CNN: Brought to you by....Pfizer!"

Expand full comment

“Thousands of judicial decisions sustaining an agency’s rulemaking or adjudication as reasonable would be open to challenge, and that profound disruption is especially unwarranted because Congress could modify or overrule the Chevron framework at any time.” Prelogaar makes that sound like a bad thing. And don't forget the ATF.

Expand full comment
author

good point RE: ATF.

Expand full comment
founding

I’ve done a quick and dirty read this opinion. My understanding is that it does shift responsibilies for law back to the Judiciary and the Congress . Reliance on Administrative agency interpretations should be very rare and are still subject to judiciary review. 

In these cases the lower courts relied on Chevron to rule that Agency interpretations were definitive. In that the Supreme Court has ruled that Chevron deference is inappropriate, these cases are now remanded for further consideration. So the issue of imposing the charges in question are still to be determined. 

We have a positive step forward, but it appears to me our concerns are still unresolved.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Syllabus

LOPER BRIGHT ENTERPRISES ET AL. v. RAIMONDO,

SECRETARY OF COMMERCE, ET AL.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Held: The Administrative Procedure Act requires courts to exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority, and courts may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous; Chevron is

overruled. Pp. 7–35.

(a) Article III of the Constitution assigns to the Federal Judiciary the responsibility and power to adjudicate “Cases” and “Controversies”—concrete disputes with consequences for the parties involved. The Framers appreciated that the laws judges would necessarily apply

in resolving those disputes would not always be clear, but envisioned

FYI - did copy out a listing of relevant discussions I can share

As always Thank You for helping us access relevant info

Expand full comment
founding

On reflection, one might conclude the lower Courts have (like the Supreme Court in Murthy) been using Chevron as a way of avoiding hot potatoes.

If Im right about the status of the Fishermen cases, one could conclude the folks we are concerned about need to file law suits.

in the course of my pursuits I learned the fishermen were represented by two nonprofits. They were funded by the Koch Foundation (Koch is anti reg). They might want to check to see if these nonprofits would take them on or recommend nonprofits that might.

Expand full comment

I hope it leads to profound resignations, dismissals, and firings.

„He has erected a multitude of new offices and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance”.

Th. Jefferson - Declaration

Expand full comment

Praise 👏 God!!!

I think that the SCOTUS is on a roll right ✅️ now while the left is in meltdown mode over the "debate!"

Expand full comment
Jun 28Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS

I’m here to ask, can we please get our incandescent lightbulbs back? And, I intend to keep my gas stovetop. :)

Expand full comment

And gas powered car

Expand full comment

Oh especially my gas powered car!!!

Expand full comment
Jun 28·edited Jun 28

It is my hope that this will help, however... they may just try to railroad their will, and force people to litigate, which is very expensive (as they are well aware). It has been a 'stop us if you can', 'but we'll bankrupt you in the process' SOP.

Expand full comment
author

True. "Catch me if you can"

Expand full comment

You have cited a very probable reaction from the Administrative (Deep) State. They have exhibited no tendency to give any deference to citizens' constitutional rights up to now (despite those rights being the law of the land) so why would they suddenly change when there is demonstrably no entity within the current federal blob who has the moral courage to enforce this decision? The deep state agencies have unlimited budgets to spend on court lawyers who in turn have 6 ways from Sunday to stretch out the litigation process well beyond plaintiff's affordability.

Expand full comment

A house divided cannot stand.

Expand full comment

Similarities to Tennessee's new geoengineering laws just passed. Yes, its great that the conspiracy "fact" was just publicly acknowledged, but can it be enforced? I don't think it's possible to prevent the blob from continuing the desecration of our environment, and lifeforms, without hand to hand combat.

Ironic to think that USG zombies and contractors would actuallly abide by a law set by an independent state.

We shall see.

Expand full comment
founding

Exactly my concern. Didn't SCOTUS rule government paying off college loans unconstitutional only for the Biden administration to do whatever it pleases in this regard?

Expand full comment

Yes. And he snarkily commented that he was doing it anyway!

Expand full comment

I believe there are states suing over this.

Expand full comment
Jun 28·edited Jun 28Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS

This was massively important. Let the administrative state disruption begin!

Let’s hope this ruling will trickle down to state medical boards and health boards, pharmacies, doctors and others who pay “Chevron Deference” obeisance to captured agencies such as CDC, FDA, NIH, WHO, etc. Perhaps we also can use this ruling to break the vast censorship industrial complex; it’s not that big a stretch to rescind the attitude: “well, the xxx administration told us to censor this guy/gal/whatever, so we did.”

Thank you to those 6 justices who decided it’s high-court time to make the legislative branch do its own work. We cheered this SCOTUS victory resoundingly!

Expand full comment

I think you are correct. It depends on the judiciary, though. I think most judges want to do as little as possible, so they liked Chevron deference -- that way they didn't have to interpret the law (do more work).

We don't realize how insidious this doctrine has been. The thousands, probably millions, of ways this practice has crept into governance. I can only hope that we will find out. It will depend both on good judges and brave people to challenge the edicts enacted by an overly intrusive/aggressive executive branch.

Regardless, it is a great step in the right direction.

Expand full comment

Amazing that this ruling took forty years to overturn! More time than it takes for a person's hair to go gray.

Expand full comment
Jun 28·edited Jun 28

My patriotic spirit is already breathing easier. The air seems less coercive all of a sudden. The first page of the sylabbus states that SCOTUS answered the question "whether Chevron ...should be overruled or clarified." The majority HELD: "Chevron is overruled."

Expand full comment
Jun 28Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS

This is great news and is a bigger decision than roe v Wade! OSHA and other administrative organizations will have a lot of turmoil

Expand full comment

More turmoil ?

How much can we stand?

Expand full comment
founding

Thank you! The part you've shared is delicious! That NIH, Fauci and the cattle industry issues are cited makes for Hugh satisfactions. The gas appliance and EV issues run against recent edicts from our Governor. A reason to newly discover a tiny light in the darkness! On reading and absorbing the rest of the details!

Bestess Always ♡♡♡0/¥¥7

Expand full comment

fantastic best parts....:)

Expand full comment

First win in a long war with the Administrative State.

Expand full comment

This is major significant good news. Major.

Expand full comment

To the Drs. Malone - Thank you for shining a light on this matter last Fall. And for calling attention to so many hidden agendas over the last four years.

In matters of governance, that which operates in the dark constitutes the greatest threat to the Republic and the Constitution. It is up to We the People to draw the line and stand our ground.

Your contribution to the Light continues to be invaluable.

Expand full comment

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagen, and Ketani Brown Jackson dissenting.....

As they were stirring the pot, keening "double double, toil and trouble, fire burn and cauldron bubble."

Expand full comment

Totally predictible!

Expand full comment

Me? Or the harridans? Or both?

Expand full comment

WOW! INCREDIBLE! FANTASTIC! WONDER of WONDERS - but MANY days and YEARS Late by the Supreme Court; and NO way of undoing the incredible damage CHEVRON (wait! make that the freaking "Natural Resources Defense Council") did to "free enterprise" in America - in the name of "saving the planet"?

The "NRDC" is a so-called "Non-Profit" organization ( code word by Collective Leftists ) signifying "non capitalist" , i.e., money- grubbing and therefore pure and righteous.

NO one voted for the "NRDC" to make policy and laws that DIRECTLY affect the daily lives of millions of (supposedly) sovereign American citizens - from birth to death!

Note the Chief Executive Officer of the "NRDC" pulls down an annual salary of: $1,189,947 - that's One Million, One Hundred Eighty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Seven dollars per year. The "average" salary of (30) voting Board members at the "NRDC" is: $932,125 dollars per year

The entire "Non-Profit"(NGO) set up is a clever ploy by the Collective Left to "legally" be "tax-free" yet VERY lucrative for CEO's presidents, board members and consultants.

Expand full comment

I’m half tempted to tweet that dude on X and ask him why does he think he deserves that salary or even that position.

Expand full comment

Would probably have the same answer the school system superintendents do for theirs

Expand full comment
founding

Exactly

Expand full comment