135 Comments
Mar 20Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS

You have hit the solution of this monstrosity of elite control dead-center. The Internet is the communication venue and at the moment Substack fulfills that access till the elites pressure the paymasters to shut individual conversations they do not like down.

I subscribe to a few only because it is too costly to subscribe to the many voices that have emerged who are vital to the safety of free speech. Most of us do not have the eloquence, the time, the important connections necessary to articulate the issues as well as the few who do. Those who learn and have their thinking extended by authors on substack should support them. To do so is to not only self-educate but to amplify the themes with which we agree and those who speak and act on our behalf.

Expand full comment
author

thank you for your support.

Expand full comment

Your writings have enormously advanced my own perception of the issues we face and provided detailed insight and references with which I can support free speech and individual rights in my own arguments. Carefully worded and contextualized verbal self-defense is more important than 2nd Amendment in today's environment. It is something I have never been able to accomplish before.

Thank you,

Expand full comment

I'll Ditto....sam ting! RWM a major DUDE. We can't do this without real integral insights.

Expand full comment

Perfectly said! I support the Malone’s substack and am a very happy subscriber! #TRUTHTELLERS

Expand full comment

Our brother-in-arms went to prison today.

Peter K. Navarro, Ph.D.

(04370-510)

15801 S.W. 137th Avenue

Miami, FL 33177

Expand full comment
author

yes. Political prisoner. Weaponization of government

Expand full comment

The End of Democracy: "What I’m Describing is Military Rule" !

Mike Benz circa 2024 encompassing Podcasts like no other.

Expand full comment

Is this the address to which letters of support can be mailed to Dr. Navarro? I encourage all to support him with well-wishes and with prayers. And if you write to him, I might suggest putting your return address inside the envelope, rather than on the outside of the envelope....

Expand full comment

Yes. Mine's on the outside for all to see.

Expand full comment

I applaud you. 👏🏼

I am no longer that brave; discretion is the better part of my valor now. 🙁

Expand full comment

In my case, I would either be put in the geriatric ward or permanently dispatched as a worthless eater. Seriously, I considered not putting my name on there but am so pissed that they can do with me what they want. And,they probably open the mail of prisoners, anyway.

Expand full comment

I think you can do more good from the shadows.

Expand full comment

It would be wonderful if thousands of cards and letters of encouragement are delivered.

Expand full comment

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

Expand full comment

Absolutely hideous! So very very wrong on so many levels! 👿👿👿

Expand full comment
Mar 20·edited Mar 21Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS

If it weren't for citizen journalists Kyle Rittenhouse would probably have been convicted. The video evidence that they provided gave a clear indication of what really happened.

The five rules of propaganda were used against him by all of the main stream media.

1 The rule of simplification - reducing all data to a simple confrontation between 'Good and Bad', 'Friend and Foe'.

2 The rule of disfiguration - discrediting the opposition by crude smears and parodies.

3 The rule of transfusion - manipulating the consensus values of the target audience for one's own ends.

4 The rule of unanimity - presenting one's viewpoint as if it were unanimous opinion of all right-thinking people: draining the doubting individual into agreement by the appeal of star-performers, by social pressure , and by 'psychological contagion'.

5 The rule of orchestration - endlessly repeating the same messages in different variations and combinations.

Rule 1: He crossed state lines and went to a rally for minority rights and shot three people, killing two. It was left for the casual listener to assume that he shot three innocent black protesters rather than three white criminals. Little if any mention of the attempts on his life, or that Kenosha was being burned and looted.

Rule 2: He was white and carrying a rifle so must have been a racist. Even the president of the U.S. Called him a white supremacist with no evidence.

Rule 3: There has been a cultural attack on the right of self defense in general since the Clinton administration, if not before. The culture as a whole is constantly called racist and fascist.

Rule 4: He received no fair consideration from the main stream media or the prominent. A situation was created such that all were expected take the side against him so as not to be considered a fascist. His legal team was even barred from using GoFundMe, and people lost their jobs for sending money to his defense fund.

Rule 5: The negative message was all one would here. Jokes were made at his expense.

There is an admonition in the Bible; woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Those who practice the five rules of propaganda should be wary of oncoming woe.

https://drp314.substack.com/p/propaganda-thoughts

Expand full comment
Mar 20Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS

Citizen journalist are filling the void left by the vacating msm.

Expand full comment

Dr. Malone, this is a very interesting, and highly intellectual, intelligent article. But what if everything can simply be distilled down to pure evil of demonic forces. It’s to well orchestrated not to be just that.

Expand full comment

It truly comes down to good vs evil, which has been around since beginning of the human experience.

Expand full comment

Agree that a "root cause analysis" leads to Satan. And by all means we want to encourage more people to faith, from which they will also so conclude.

But folks today have been conditioned to view the world (solely) trough a secular lens, so we must also reach to and communicate with them where they are ... from which we can start "nudging" or "red-pilling" toward faith.

IMHO.

Expand full comment

James O’Keefe — founder of Project Veritas, ousted, then founder of O’Keefe Media Group (OMG) — has been doing citizen journalism for a while. People can sign up to be citizen journalists and learn about OMG 😲’s efforts at https://okeefemediagroup.com/. They offer training, tools, and ways to upload and share stories.

I haven’t investigated all the offerings in depth, but OMG could be a good way to begin or to collaborate.

Expand full comment

What is ironic is that when I write in various blogs something that doesn't agree with 'their' narrative (even when it's alt-media) I get censored because my perspective doesn't fit nicely with that one.

Example: I was on Mercola's blog and he was pushing the "Fit-Bit' which is a wearable technology software to 'monitor' your health stats. When I shared my (2) concerns...the first being attached on my skin to EMF technology 24/7 and the 2nd concern being that all my health data/stats are being recorded and stored in the cloud....My comment was deleted/censored because it 'didn't fit the narrative'....and this coming from an MD who is anti-vax and anti-western medicine in most areas.

Here's another example...MSM makes it look like financial markets are pretty stable right now but many say that the markets have already crashed. MSM can post whatever BS math and number schemes they want about the DJIA, the price of gold...silver, etc....but many companies are behaving (internally) like their stock has CRASHED (I know this from first hand experience).

Are parts of Boeing airplanes falling out of the sky because of DEI...or because of MASSIVE lay-offs and lack of workforce (which isn't being disclosed)? Look beyond the headlines to what might 'really' be happening....Are things getting ready to (finally) crash? Globalists will prop it up as long as they can because once it falls, they lose their power...Is it finally time to rip off the band-aid ?

Expand full comment

Glenn Beck's recent piece said the same thing. Is it Boeing, or is it United, either with worthless mechanics because of DEI or just too few mechanics . . . Or was it Boeing taking shortcuts as the deceased whistleblower claimed.

Expand full comment

One heck of a lot of airplane mechanics were trained in the military. How many do you think the air lines are getting from that source now?

Expand full comment

I have no clue. Perhaps they have on-the-job training or they get the military's 'finest'. I have a friend whose grandson was in the Air Force and took as many courses as were available. He got out a couple of years ago and Space Force scooped him up, not an airline.

Expand full comment

That was a somewhat unserious question based on my experience of being in there during the Nam draft when the AF had their pick from scads of volunteers to train and they trained them very well. Had a roomie who crew chiefed F105s was brought to Brooks to crew chief the same human centrifuge our astronauts flew in. Bet you would guess he was pretty good at his job huh? Doubt those conditions prevail today and the airlines have to dig deeper for help.

Expand full comment

I guessed it was, that's why a put finest in ' '. I think it is still true, at least through 2020, that the military trained excellent mechanics. I think private jet companies and the likes of Space Force get the best coming from the military.

Expand full comment

Michael, their too worried 😟 about using correct pronouns that they didn't learn in English classes!

Expand full comment

Sorta what I was hinting around. Also, I suspect the draft drew in a better or at least broader range of recruits avoiding the draft. There is not that factor operating today. Also, turnover likely much smaller so fewer entering job market. The AF was HUGE back in m time there

Expand full comment

Video Games? They do Pro Pilot for training pilots. Why not aircraft Maintenance?

Expand full comment

James O’Keefe and O’Keefe Media Group (OMG) did the most to formalize citizen reporting. Almost all incidents of successful citizen reporting were luck - being in the right place at the right time. OMG is training people to do it. We need it.

Expand full comment

In Your Handle, It should read “Atlas Shrugged”. 😁 Ed

Expand full comment

Nice share Dr. Malone. The corruption of information is increasingly taking more time, players, and oversight thus becoming ever so cumbersome. Every avenue available is already in use - USG, media TV/radio/Cable, newspapers, journals, magazines, academia, tech companies, NGOs for hire and most recently payment entities. I wonder what steps will come after that.

What avenues for the Patriots when the squeeze gets worse? " . . .enable development of next generation tools and capabilities designed to support and empower the global explosion of citizen journalism." That, no doubt, will take billionaires to join as one force. Google has control of the 'Cloud' and finding ways around that will be problematic. Others think they have a work-a-round like The Blaze, The Remnant, and now Rumble. When CBDC starts working here, as it has in other countries, this task may become unattainable. Best to jump on that parallel capability right now. Start contacting those that already have geared up. Talk not just browsers, but internet connection providers, email providers and so forth.

Expand full comment

Shelley, I take comfort in the proverb: Necessity is the Mother of Invention!

When it is absolutely essential that something be done, the urgency will cause, motivate or even force us to think of a way to do it!

Participating in discussion venues like this one will SPARK an idea 💡 in one of us!!!

I just HAVE to BELIEVE 🙏 that the Lord will direct our steps!!!

Expand full comment

"History's judgment" will depend on those rendering it; either an Orwellian Ministry of Truth, or in opposition, a society of free thinkers and speakers. If the former prevails, then actual truth is subject to a journey down the memory hole.

Expand full comment

If it wasn’t for brave citizen journalists, which I include people such as yourself, Bongino, Bannon, Rogan…we the people would only hear the “approved narrative”. The elites (sociopaths) can’t stand the informed citizen who can now spread information outside the “approved narrative”.

Expand full comment
Mar 20Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS

Check out Whitney Webb and James Corbett. They both do incredible work and are truly outside of approved narratives.

Expand full comment

Thank 😊 you Doctors Robert and Jill.

All of these media wars have caused a division with my children and my siblings that I haven't had much success in mending the divide.

I am sending this article to my sister to see 👀 if it can penetrate the wall 🧱 that has been designed and has been built by the legacy media to continue to tear the fabric of our country!

Expand full comment

Be sure to report if it penetrated!

Expand full comment

Shelley,

It usually takes more than an article, but there is hope.

When people are so entrenched in how they feel about something, it usually takes a very abrupt change in their lives. Something large, something very tragic, or something very violent. People do not let go of their preconceived notions very easily, and it's unfortunately so.

I can tell you that when I was much younger, it was severe interruptions in my life that altered my thought process. Doesn't take much now, because I look at all possible perspectives that are made available, and try to discern what is relevant, or misleading, and go from there. Matthias Desmet has made his observations very clear that a large part of the population cannot see through what they're fed, while 30% do. At least that is how I interpreted what few articles I've read of his.

BTW,

I'm not a psychologist, nor a psychiatrist, but I did sleep in a Holiday Inn Express, last night.

Expand full comment

Oh my dear Shelley ♥️, if you only knew how 🤔 long I've been trying to get through to my sister. I get discouraged when all I get from her are Legacy media talking points!

As a matter of fact, I had just recently told my other sister that I was DONE TRYING to get THIS sister to actually see what's happening, when today I got this article and I said: SELF, maybe THIS article will be the one that will finally do the TRICK.

If it doesn't do it, maybe this time I 🤔 I will actually give up?!?!

Expand full comment

Ana, many of the posters on this SS are in the same boat and they've talked about, as have I with my youngest brother who will be 70 in June. I admit that I quit emailing excellent articles to him some months ago, as he would not even respond he received them. Even the FLCCC link failed to get a response. He was negatively affected by his numerous jabs.

I was hoping that someone, perhaps you, could make a dent and let us all know that there was concrete hope!

Expand full comment

“The light is always on; and, the door is always open”. Robert Malone, M.D….”Please Pay Attention”. Robert Malone, M.D. “The Cells Do Not Lie”. Ryan Cole, M.D……These are the Individuals I Trust. Ed

Edit - One of My Best Friend’s, double board certified physician, asks why I will not get jabbed. Response = “ I am Part of the Control Group”. 🔥😁🏴‍☠️

Expand full comment

Ed, I am going to borrow that when needed “ I am Part of the Control Group”. Love it.

Expand full comment

I totally agree 👍 Shelley!

We ALL need validation.

It would be wonderful if we could see success from any of our buddies at the pub as T. calls our SS venue!!!

Expand full comment

Well, Shelley,

(Smile)

Dont give up if you love her.

Expand full comment

I heard a clip of Elon Musk telling Don Lemon that he was worried about doing the right thing, and about preventing civilizational destruction, rather than being worried about how history would judge him. So, love him or hate him, at least one of the titans perhaps something different on his mind than the narrative. (The communication between Elon and the creators of the Babylon Bee has convinced me that he's not the same as the others.)

On a personal note, I've been decentralizing dollarwise even prior to buying Lindows as an alternative to Microsoft. :-D That's a lot of years.

Expand full comment

Ha ha.... yes, I watched Lemon trying to manipulate Elon too. Don wasn't even bright enough to figure out he was making an ass of himself. On the moron scale this week it's a tough choice for the top spot.... Lemon or Ketangi Brown Jackson on the 1st Amendment. I have to admit being pretty much dumbfounded watching her Senate confirmation hearings when she was asked what her definition a woman is and her oh so clever answer was, "I'm not a biologist" that they didn't escort her out of the chambers right then and there.

Expand full comment

Jackson was hilarious with that eruption of hers about the 1st amendment. I felt obligated to share that one elsewhere. It was astonishing to see a judge appointed to potentially rule on laws that would pertain to women specifically, if she did not know how to define "woman". But now in Washington state, no test is required to be an attorney, so..... downward the spiral goes.

Expand full comment

My dad and I recently had a conversation about how there are some people who can see through the propaganda easily, and how some can't.

Expand full comment

It's sad that all of main stream has become Propaganda supporting the Deep State. Humanity must now stand on its own for better or worse. Each person is an independent sovereign being in his/her own right. That is how the world should be run. Not by so-called behemoth governments. But at the community level where all ideas matter. The old system of Nationalism, and enemies is going the way of the dinosaur. Human beings will come together in oneness for the greater good of all of humanity. What can be better than that?

Expand full comment

Edward, maybe all of us can share in the blame for killing our sovereignty!?!?!

We're we too busy, too distracted, too self absorbed?

Expand full comment

correct.

Expand full comment

Hi 👋, T!!!

Expand full comment

Hello, Sweet Ana.

Nice to see you around the pub's main bar. Can you pass the peanuts?

Expand full comment

Hee Hee ‼️

Expand full comment

You are right to some extent, but the technological prowess of the Deep State has been used to misdirect our attention, and in some cases cause us to become involved in activities such as ridiculing our peers for their views. These folks are evil. Sure some people are self-absorbed, but I wonder what role all the commercials about being sexy, slim, drinking alcohol, beauty advertisements etc . play in that behaviour.

Expand full comment

I don't think it's so much cannot see as it is will not see.

The old saying goes there are none so blind as those who will not see

Big difference between cannot and will not.

Expand full comment

Good point

Expand full comment

Karen, did your discussion with your dad dig into how or what it is that makes it easier for some to be able to see through the propaganda?

Or will we always be divided into those 2 camps?

Expand full comment

My theory is that it simply has to do with what we watch..being fed a steady diet of propaganda and gaslighting every day for years

Expand full comment

Sherlock Holmes once informed Watson that he saw much but observed little. Apply this advice to news sources and it comes down to developing a talent to “read between the lines”.

Expand full comment

This is only one of four causes of our mindset, but obviously the strongest. Here is how I understand our thinking process. Our mindset is caused by the conditional cause of a genetic predisposition (Genetic Makeup) for being liberal or conservative, the conditional cause of living in a conservative or liberal environment (Living Environment), and the conditional cause of thinking causally or not (Thinking Process), coupled with the action cause of feeding our minds liberal or conservative information (Information Intake).

Depending on the combination and strength of these four causes, one’s mindset can be highly varied. You could have liberal genes, live in a harsh environment (conservative), use a categorical/storytelling thinking process (liberal) and feed your brain conservative ideas. Depending on the combination of causes, many different mindsets are possible in the same person, and this helps explain why we may be liberal minded on some subjects and conservative on others.

By feeding our minds liberal or conservative ideas our brains become wired according to which set of ideas we fed it the most. A highly liberal mind would be genetically liberal, living an easy life, using categorical storytelling to think about liberal ideas. Whereas a highly conservative person would have conservative genes, living a challenging life and using causal thinking skills to feed the brain conservative ideas. But there are 16 possible combinations of these four causes, and when combined with the probability of occurrence and the many ways we process information, we can see why people are so unique.

Expand full comment

Well, there is that I guess. So much for I choose my thoughts . . .

Expand full comment

What? 😂

Expand full comment

Decentralize Media (Substack, podcasts, citizen journalists, videos)

Decentralize academia (home schooling)

Decentralize money (Bitcoin)

Next up:

Decentralize medicine.

Decentralize science.

Decentralize government.

Decentralization is the rebellion.

Decentralize everything:

https://open.substack.com/pub/joshketry/p/decentralize-everything-in-1776-america?r=7oa9d&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment

I suggest we decentralize the Federal government by at least 75%?

Expand full comment
founding

Thank you for your efforts to enable those among us, who are identifying issues of import that we want to know and understand perspectives and ultimately truths about, to accomplish such ends.

First to know and assess the merits of sources of such information. Next to evaluate the various sources. Personally have given up TV, newspapers, magazines, liberal radio programming and generally liberal internet sources. My conservative sources critique them and offer clips and quotes.

Next to appreciate the objectives of the offerings from mainstream sources and that there are highly likely relevant truths they are/are having censored.

On to identifying and effectively accessing sources of the meaningful truthes we elect to pursue. To me this is a major challenge, worthy of a lot of effort by such independent sources (how to be found) and us in how to find them. Perhaps even a topic to be pursued in furtherance of the objective.

Personally am glad to have the sources I regularly rely on. The Malones in particular. Will be looking forward to the new book! Time and financial constraints are limiting. I much appreciate the comments of this community.

OFF TOPIC:

Censorship. Read several Brownstone, J Tucker articles re Murthy v Missouri. Listened to some of Supreme Court proceedings. Justice Brown, was incredible/appalling. Listened to parts of hearings on the Administrative State (re ALJ Operations) and CCP purchases of farm land. Echos off Browns views seeped in. Clearly this won't be a 9 to 0 opinion. The good news perhaps is it presenting an opportunity for a more general awareness. An aside Texas started a new case against the State Dept (?) Re the program they had developed and are peddling for censoring.

The GOOD NEWS was a Congressional press conference by House Doctors re their new bill to ban DEI being taught in medical schools. Seems they can stop funding if there is a violation. A worthwhile step. (Next IMO should be to assure Dr's will venture beyond CDC. AI checklisting and ascribe to the FLCCC apply independant considerations approach.

MUCH SUCCESS !!!

Bestest n then some ♡♡♡

Expand full comment