Perhaps this will help as we have been here before – started almost 20 years ago. They are still winning that round so they were confident they could pull it off again. We have a better chance this time because of the uptick in conservative social media, but odds are not on our side. This will be familiar to all because it has been beate…
Perhaps this will help as we have been here before – started almost 20 years ago. They are still winning that round so they were confident they could pull it off again. We have a better chance this time because of the uptick in conservative social media, but odds are not on our side. This will be familiar to all because it has been beaten into us for years, but also because of how TRUE SCIENCE is denied and THEY ARE GETTING AWAY WITH IT. I think that the Drs. Malone and others can personally relate to these excerpts on something similarfrom February 2014 on something similar.
Powerful forces at the UN, in national governments and INSIDE THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY make life very difficult for scientists disputing the conventional wisdom on climate change, both personally and professionally, even though the REAL SCIENCE is on the side of the skeptics. That's the assertion of Dr. Tim Ball, a former professor of climatology at the University of Winnipeg, who revealed the true cause of climate change in a radio interview for WND. The modern climate-change movement finds its roots in the Malthusian notion that the population must be lowered to avoid running out of food and other resources. He said that theory led to the demonizing of industrialized nations and, in turn, fossil fuels and carbon dioxide in particular.
He also explained how Maurice Strong used his position as head of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, to set a POLITICAL AGENDA purportedly backed up by the latest in CLIMATE SCIENCE. Ball also said the U.N. then collaborated with the World Meteorological Organization to present the IPCC findings as SETTLED SCIENCE and shamed or denied funding to any scientists who disagreed with their conclusions. For scientists bold enough to speak out anyway, finding any interest from scientists or the media in hearing opposing viewpoints proved very difficult.
"It made the counter-argument almost impossible because one of the things they started is that they defeated the SCIENTIFIC METHOD. "Scientists create hypotheses and what would normally happen with a hypothesis is that other scientists would challenge that and those other scientists would challenge it as skeptics because all scientists are skeptics or should be.” Climate-change ACTIVISTS turned that natural, professional skepticism into a public buzzword that branded Ball and others as part of an ideological fringe. "We were marginalized in blocking the SCIENTIFIC METHOD. And then, of course, we were marginalized because of public relations attacks based on who was funding us or what our agenda was," he said.
"I've often thought if I had to do it again, I wouldn't do it," he said. "Until you have experienced, like some are having with the IRS attacking them in the U.S., you cannot relate to other people exactly what it's like when you are sitting in your little condo and you've spent all of your savings on legal fees. And (when there's) a knock on the door at 4 o'clock on a Friday and your wife starts crying because she's afraid it's the sheriff delivering a legal summons. People have no idea what that's like. I'm not sure that I would do it again. I'm almost at the point where if the world wants to be fooled, let it be fooled. I'm not going to fight for it again. "That's why a lot of scientists said to me, 'We're not prepared to go through what you've gone through.' I sort of sympathize with that, but like Edmund Burke said, evil triumphs when good people stand idly by.
Perhaps this will help as we have been here before – started almost 20 years ago. They are still winning that round so they were confident they could pull it off again. We have a better chance this time because of the uptick in conservative social media, but odds are not on our side. This will be familiar to all because it has been beaten into us for years, but also because of how TRUE SCIENCE is denied and THEY ARE GETTING AWAY WITH IT. I think that the Drs. Malone and others can personally relate to these excerpts on something similarfrom February 2014 on something similar.
Powerful forces at the UN, in national governments and INSIDE THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY make life very difficult for scientists disputing the conventional wisdom on climate change, both personally and professionally, even though the REAL SCIENCE is on the side of the skeptics. That's the assertion of Dr. Tim Ball, a former professor of climatology at the University of Winnipeg, who revealed the true cause of climate change in a radio interview for WND. The modern climate-change movement finds its roots in the Malthusian notion that the population must be lowered to avoid running out of food and other resources. He said that theory led to the demonizing of industrialized nations and, in turn, fossil fuels and carbon dioxide in particular.
He also explained how Maurice Strong used his position as head of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, to set a POLITICAL AGENDA purportedly backed up by the latest in CLIMATE SCIENCE. Ball also said the U.N. then collaborated with the World Meteorological Organization to present the IPCC findings as SETTLED SCIENCE and shamed or denied funding to any scientists who disagreed with their conclusions. For scientists bold enough to speak out anyway, finding any interest from scientists or the media in hearing opposing viewpoints proved very difficult.
"It made the counter-argument almost impossible because one of the things they started is that they defeated the SCIENTIFIC METHOD. "Scientists create hypotheses and what would normally happen with a hypothesis is that other scientists would challenge that and those other scientists would challenge it as skeptics because all scientists are skeptics or should be.” Climate-change ACTIVISTS turned that natural, professional skepticism into a public buzzword that branded Ball and others as part of an ideological fringe. "We were marginalized in blocking the SCIENTIFIC METHOD. And then, of course, we were marginalized because of public relations attacks based on who was funding us or what our agenda was," he said.
"I've often thought if I had to do it again, I wouldn't do it," he said. "Until you have experienced, like some are having with the IRS attacking them in the U.S., you cannot relate to other people exactly what it's like when you are sitting in your little condo and you've spent all of your savings on legal fees. And (when there's) a knock on the door at 4 o'clock on a Friday and your wife starts crying because she's afraid it's the sheriff delivering a legal summons. People have no idea what that's like. I'm not sure that I would do it again. I'm almost at the point where if the world wants to be fooled, let it be fooled. I'm not going to fight for it again. "That's why a lot of scientists said to me, 'We're not prepared to go through what you've gone through.' I sort of sympathize with that, but like Edmund Burke said, evil triumphs when good people stand idly by.
https://www.wnd.com/2014/02/identified-major-cause-of-climate-change/