Keep talking about INFORMED CONSENT: this is medical legal equivalent of agreeing to and understanding what the "medicine" regardless of the outcome is and despite all the disclaimers not withstanding. Informed consent is critical in all cases. Covid and its vaccinations and boosters hiding behind the Emergency mandate .. as well as this…
Keep talking about INFORMED CONSENT: this is medical legal equivalent of agreeing to and understanding what the "medicine" regardless of the outcome is and despite all the disclaimers not withstanding. Informed consent is critical in all cases. Covid and its vaccinations and boosters hiding behind the Emergency mandate .. as well as this horrific attempt by left wing uninformed media, know it all in general "teachers" on the side of actually secretly fostering and promoting pre teens and all MINORS.. (under the age of 18) decisions about their gender and identity: legally children do not have the contractual right to agree to medical changes which would impact the rest of lives without parental consent who are ultimately responsible for the welfare and well being of their children. INFORMED CONSENT. thanks. for that post.
Nazi Germany also declared a “state of emergency”. That is not a waiver of the responsibility to respect basic human rights as laid out in the Nuremberg Code.
Facist gov't favorite tool is declare national emergencies history has shown us. As student of Germany history and the Nuremberg Trials.. and international agreements/treaties.. etc which i don't like to use as a basis for comparison to our Constitutional republic: that is really conflating two very different issues. in fact I will take back the fascist govts like to declare national emergencies.. Dems like FDR and also the Weimer republic's constitution which allowed for the declaration national emergencies provided the bases for n a s i s of evil megalomaniacs. No names mentioned.. on my posts. and FDR declared one of the biggest ever. but I need to go. as always.. I am doing research in other areas right now: still tired but hanging in there. :)
It should, of course. EC. I was first introduced to Informed Consent when I built a database for the Prostate Cancer and I personally had to get "Informed Consents" for which I had to actually the write the Informed Consent (the language) and get the signature from the Patient in person on the Informed consent which was put into his file. The Informed Consent stated that the Patient agreed to allow his data to be used in a clinical database as well as his agreement to use a certain drug, in 2001. It was much later in my life researching for Cancer articles/book did I really understand how important Informed consents were and the magnitude of what it really means to get an INFORMED CONSENT from any and all participants and patients when I worked in the medical legal arena with disabled patients and later the broad scope of including Informed consent which is implied by the nature of the medical legal transaction. I am not talking about Intenational / Nuremberg war crime scenarios though I get why that is brought up: for context so you will understand why I answered like that. To answer your question directly: YES. Informed consent must be applied.. which means a consensual agreement between parties who are fully equal legally under the law, (age, comprehension, which means the ability to understand why consent is required) in all cases, including your case w/ regard to Darpa. .. it is late. but that is the short answer. Fauci is going.. so he says. I didn't know and will check out about his wife. Get some rest. I will do the same.
I didn't know he deleted them.. EC .. I totally disagree with transhumanist and futurists. Andrew Sandberg is NOT WHO I WOUILD LOOK TO FOR ANY ANSWERS AT ALL. most of those people (do not believe in God). Sandberg advocates for computer simulations instead of animal modeling which is acceptable in certain circumstances (mice/rats). EMBRACE STRANGE is Ok. sure we are all different. Mentally ill people do sign legal contracts all day long. it is one of the things I could not get over but forced myself because the law does speak to the fact if Mentally Ill and disabled people so are incompetent they can not make their own decisions and need for other people (I acted as their POA..) how can they allow sign contracts to even consent to that but is about long time planning and comprehension of extremely complicated concepts. The issue with using the term N a # i is that Substack is public forum and people can say OH WOW. so and so called such and such a and I agree with that too because the world is filled with nutjobs.. and good people too so anyway I am busy as usual this morning.. NoVA is always busy.. and I mean that. just busy. I got a good night's rest for a change.. just the noise around here.. I will tell you this.. the corona virus which i am now getting over makes one feel like one's head is hurting like that.. but I know it is congestion and my ear drum which had a hole in it. so I am feeling better. I wish I could be of more help to you. :) take care.
Keep talking about INFORMED CONSENT: this is medical legal equivalent of agreeing to and understanding what the "medicine" regardless of the outcome is and despite all the disclaimers not withstanding. Informed consent is critical in all cases. Covid and its vaccinations and boosters hiding behind the Emergency mandate .. as well as this horrific attempt by left wing uninformed media, know it all in general "teachers" on the side of actually secretly fostering and promoting pre teens and all MINORS.. (under the age of 18) decisions about their gender and identity: legally children do not have the contractual right to agree to medical changes which would impact the rest of lives without parental consent who are ultimately responsible for the welfare and well being of their children. INFORMED CONSENT. thanks. for that post.
Nazi Germany also declared a “state of emergency”. That is not a waiver of the responsibility to respect basic human rights as laid out in the Nuremberg Code.
Facist gov't favorite tool is declare national emergencies history has shown us. As student of Germany history and the Nuremberg Trials.. and international agreements/treaties.. etc which i don't like to use as a basis for comparison to our Constitutional republic: that is really conflating two very different issues. in fact I will take back the fascist govts like to declare national emergencies.. Dems like FDR and also the Weimer republic's constitution which allowed for the declaration national emergencies provided the bases for n a s i s of evil megalomaniacs. No names mentioned.. on my posts. and FDR declared one of the biggest ever. but I need to go. as always.. I am doing research in other areas right now: still tired but hanging in there. :)
It should, of course. EC. I was first introduced to Informed Consent when I built a database for the Prostate Cancer and I personally had to get "Informed Consents" for which I had to actually the write the Informed Consent (the language) and get the signature from the Patient in person on the Informed consent which was put into his file. The Informed Consent stated that the Patient agreed to allow his data to be used in a clinical database as well as his agreement to use a certain drug, in 2001. It was much later in my life researching for Cancer articles/book did I really understand how important Informed consents were and the magnitude of what it really means to get an INFORMED CONSENT from any and all participants and patients when I worked in the medical legal arena with disabled patients and later the broad scope of including Informed consent which is implied by the nature of the medical legal transaction. I am not talking about Intenational / Nuremberg war crime scenarios though I get why that is brought up: for context so you will understand why I answered like that. To answer your question directly: YES. Informed consent must be applied.. which means a consensual agreement between parties who are fully equal legally under the law, (age, comprehension, which means the ability to understand why consent is required) in all cases, including your case w/ regard to Darpa. .. it is late. but that is the short answer. Fauci is going.. so he says. I didn't know and will check out about his wife. Get some rest. I will do the same.
I didn't know he deleted them.. EC .. I totally disagree with transhumanist and futurists. Andrew Sandberg is NOT WHO I WOUILD LOOK TO FOR ANY ANSWERS AT ALL. most of those people (do not believe in God). Sandberg advocates for computer simulations instead of animal modeling which is acceptable in certain circumstances (mice/rats). EMBRACE STRANGE is Ok. sure we are all different. Mentally ill people do sign legal contracts all day long. it is one of the things I could not get over but forced myself because the law does speak to the fact if Mentally Ill and disabled people so are incompetent they can not make their own decisions and need for other people (I acted as their POA..) how can they allow sign contracts to even consent to that but is about long time planning and comprehension of extremely complicated concepts. The issue with using the term N a # i is that Substack is public forum and people can say OH WOW. so and so called such and such a and I agree with that too because the world is filled with nutjobs.. and good people too so anyway I am busy as usual this morning.. NoVA is always busy.. and I mean that. just busy. I got a good night's rest for a change.. just the noise around here.. I will tell you this.. the corona virus which i am now getting over makes one feel like one's head is hurting like that.. but I know it is congestion and my ear drum which had a hole in it. so I am feeling better. I wish I could be of more help to you. :) take care.