Currently I consider AI to be the same as MSM and the Gov, as it does not have common sense or can AI think for itself, because it can only consider what was input into its database which is no more trustworthy.
It should be noted that a person I follow (Courtney Brown) did a recent show featuring two AI Large Language Models (Google's Gemini and X's Grok) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZJEM5RnqGQ . He asked each of these models a set of identical questions. They came out quite different, but it was obvious that both models were curated and biased in favor of "the official government explanation."
At my church, it is a crime to enter false data into a computer. It is too bad this rule is not more widely practiced. Of course, a lot depends on who gets to decide "false" versus "true." But if you could come up with a system where all reasonable "truths" were honored, you wouldn't have the horrific results that we see now.
Google any medical related issue and you get a very biased menu. According to this article, AI is being used as a faster more sophisticated propaganda tool. We need legal regulations to halt information bias, allowing open access to opposing viewpoints from alternative databases. Otherwise, information will not reflect reality, and eventually everyone will fall into the ditch. A con job can only last so long without dire consequences.
True. I was thinking about that this morning. I am reading a book on how different cultures throughout history have viewed death and the aftermath if there is one. Plato took the idea from Socrates of an eternal soul. The Hebrews did not view the body and soul as separate, and unlike the Greeks did not believe the soul lived on in 'hell or heaven' yet that is the notion adopted by the Christian church. Yet, millions of people have been indoctrinated with this idea for a long time. We are all so indoctrinated by those who came before us, hard to parse out what is really true.
Rita, as you may have guessed by now, I have come to read and search out people who are in touch with a higher source of information. And they need to be tried and true for me to pay much attention. Edgar Cayce was one of the first, even my mother read him. I know personally Dannion Brinkley, and have worked with him on hospice. There is a book by Levi Dowling, "the Aquarian Gospel of Jesus Christ" and "Testimony of Light" Helen Greaves. Sounds like you are a reader and not afraid to look outside the usual info. Take a peek...
Edgar Cayce was a true healer, who could 'see' beyond the material plane of existence. I read years ago 'There is a river', I forget it though. As a child my father told me stories about Biddy Early and brought me to her tiny little house which at that point was run down. It was fascinating to hear how she healed those before they even arrived at her house, and she focused her healing intention using a blue bottle. I think information acquired through dreams, day visions, or simply intuition is deeper and broader to the limited intellect. I am still not clear though on whether any part of the individual remains without the brain. I know we can communicate psychically with the hardware interface of the brain, instantly no matter the distance, or even before an event, I don't know how consciousness works without that interface in terms of the individual.
I'm not sure what you mean about the brain, when Dannion was DOA he still had his spiritual awareness and brought the memory back. Not too many people have a true death, mostly "near-death".
What I'm saying is our brain can connect with everything outside of space and time, but what is it that connects without the brain? I just don't understand how it works. Where is the information of consciousness concentrated for transmission. These are very heady questions, I don't expect you to know. Few do I imagine.
I'll give you my best shot, Rita. The soul and spiritual consciousness don't reside in the brain. Awareness is not limited to the brain either. The crown chakra is where we exit the body as far as I can tell. When My mother appeared to me in a dream and the same night appeared to my son in a different location after her "death" She conveyed to me that she had made the transition and all was well. My son saw her in the same 'rejuvenated body' as I call it, looking the same as her most vital years. Eight other people have appeared to me after their transition and two before. These have all been verified by family members as to the accuracy of my experience. I couldn't make this stuff up if I tried...
Right the soul is not 'in' the brain, but yet the brain is an interface. So, there was an energetic image of your mother that arrived via your brain, I guess the brain, which is made of a denser frequency of matter, can transduce information from the higher frequencies. I have many similar experiences as you occurring since I was a teen. If I did not have such experiences, I think I would not see beyond the material level. Even though 'material' is still mostly space.
Yes, and Dannion has written several books as well as hundreds of books from Cayce's readings. Levi got the information during the "Quiet Hours" 3-4 in the morning. There is quite the extensive introduction by his wife Eva. Copyright 1907. Testimony of Light given to Helen from Frances Banks, M.A. a former nun who got a calling to leave the order. This is the testimony of Francis from the "other side". Copyright 1967.
My training and background centered on computers and weapons. Later I retired and wrote books. Novels about "the hero's journey" -- A huge genre from Beowulf to Star Wars, but one now suppressed.
"It is clear that AI is going to dominate our online lives and if those AI Language models are fed garbage, then the history books will be written to reflect that vomitus. But if the competitive playing field is even, eventually non-biased or conservatively biased AI Language models will be developed and enabled - as long as there is a market for such. That is how capitalism works.
However, the tech industry is dominated by progressives. Those very progressives who run monopolies like Google. It is this inherent bias of the internet, combined with the censorship, that worries those of us who believe in free speech."
I agree. GIGO -- garbage in, garbage out, but AI can make it much faster, better, and more appealing. Be careful what you wish for.
This I picked up in the past week. Nathaniel Rothschild ended his request by stating: "Without Ukraine the global order may not survive". He stated Russia must be brought to its knees. He wanted funding to not stop. 650,000 Ukrainian military dead (best stat I could find from foreign sources).
The "End-Game" of socialism/communism is IDENTICAL, that being ABSOLUTE control of the "means of production" on a GLOBAL scale by International Socialism/Communism; with the three main elements (globally) of the means of production being: (1. ALL land and water, (2. ALL labor (humanity), and (3. MONEY in whatever form be it gold, silver, paper money or DIGITAL.
Those who know real history want no part of their Global Order. As Tom Daniel said (above) I will add that the end game is a totalitarian surveillance state.
Klaus Schwab made it clear that the world needs the globalists' Great Reset.
Schwab and his elites (most of whom stay out of the eye of the public) want to destroy our cultures and our concept of family and country. This is why they send millions of people from cultures totally different from ours to Europe, the USA, Australia, and New Zealand to wreak havoc.
If you know the patterns in history you can predict what will go on.
Amsel Mayer Rothschild conspired with French Grand Freemasons to stage a Revolution in France and he wanted it to start in 1789.
The past four years in America have been absolute chaos and lawlessness. Cooperating with the globalists is this Deep State which does what these elite globalist billionaires want.
These past four years under the psychopathic, demented Joe Biden have been utter insanity - ending free speech, arresting innocent people who did not agree with Democrat Party terror (and include RINOs), opening the US borders, letting Antifa and BLM riot in the cities and towns, and supporting horrific wars in the mid east and in the Ukraine. These progressives are doing exactly what Lenin, Trotsky, Mao Zedong, Saul Alinsky, and many others did. You create chaos to destroy/subdue, frighten people.
Everything is an INVERSION (those who follow the satanic know that inversions are essential).
These tactics have been going on for hundreds of years- the patterns are similar.
William Guy Carr's book Pawns In The Game gives a good view of what has gone on since the mid 1600s when Oliver Cromwell accepted money from a Dutch money lender. I have read dozens of other books and hundreds of papers by brilliant men and women and they all confirm how psychopathic politicians and money people want to rule the world.
What Nathaniel Rothschild said stunned me because he said it so openly. The USA pushed Russia into invading the Ukraine. Fantastic sums of money keep pouring in to the Ukraine so you know something really big is at stake for these Globalists. Rothschild also said to "step up information warfare to correct opinion, especially online, and send weaponry to our friends in Ukraine".
It was just easy for many of us to see what was going on. This is what sociopaths and psychopaths do. These Globalists can crash economies too,
We can beat them.
I was stunned when I saw
The message from Nathaniel Rothschild was stunning because he is practically admitting
I found a statement a few days back wherein Nathaniel Rothschild said that Ukraine is an essential piece in the geopolitical chess board
John, would you think, based on your background that one could develop a series of questions to feed an AI source that would basically reveal its calibration or, even ideally, to force calibrate it.
-- questions about the most biased genre's that push it to talk on those areas and reveal bias?
-- questions that feed it additional info followed by questions to determine if it utilized that info vs before feeding it?
-- feed specific info to different AI sources before asking the same question in multiple ways; analyze responses to compare the different AI's
-- some combo of above to get ALL AI sources(say, compare 2 or 3) to vomit the SAME response.
I find it very difficult to use search engines to find articles that don't all follow the same line. I know there are other opinions, but DuckDuckGo is front end loaded with the gatekeepers.
Did you read Carville thinks the Trump administration will collapse in less than 30 days? What is he getting wind of that the WH is unaware of or is he trying to push a narrative to build 'civil disobedience'?
People looking at him cussing and acting superior on recent "moments" and see he is just a mean old boomer who can't give up. Most Dems probably can't stand him and Conservatives like to laugh at him.
I do realize that it is predominantly owned by Russians. However, they are far less likely to censor anything. At least that has been my experience after using them for a least a year or more. I have found things using Yandex that I would be completely unable to find elsewhere.
Ratings, Eyeballs, Targeting ads to the coveted 25-54 audience was how I made a living for 30 years. I got out of the tv, radio and internet ad sales business 15 years ago. It was a dirty business even back then, but it paid well. I feel healthier and much cleaner now.
A problem I have with AI is that we are being told it can be humanized in its "thinking". But much of our intellectual output is directly and indirectly influenced by our 5 senses none of which are shared by machines and certainly not by any combination of them acting in concert. So its thinking can only at best be a poor approximation of human thought.
Agreed! Our whole society has been fed lies, which support commercial l interests. . If there is no truth to input, how could even AI come up with answers?
Thank you for this discussion. Surely points we need to keep in mind.
One of the doctors appearing on a recent FLCCC presentation opined she would not use AI generated medical materials. She anticipates HHS groupthink will be the source of content. She believes other info and opinions will not be a part of the training. From what you report, it appears outsiders will be unable to add to systems fund of knowledge.
Today I heard 2 commercials (WBAL) hawking the virtues of glycosphate (sp) so we can be assured sufficient food can be grown to feed us all.
i damaged one of my 2 phones and am looking into replacing it. Samsung has partnered with Google. From the sound of it, Google is busy building,
tentacles into all possible apps. In my personal opinion Google is highly unlikely to be the only Tech pursuing such ends. They offer an AI system. Anyone trying to assure AIs will offer a level playing field has a huge challenge ahead.
I surely appreciate you're keeping us abreast of these issues!
I had an experience with AI almost identical to Dr. Malone's. "
I had listed this, along w/ several other FBI blunders, on X: "1993 World Trade Center bombing (FBI had advance knowledge of bombing, and bungled a plan to substitute harmless powder for explosives)"
I was challenged on it, and sought to find some reporting on it. I had always considered Brave to be a neutral search engine that protects privacy, and did a search there. This is the first sentence of a verbose AI-generated response: "There is no credible evidence to support the claim that the FBI had advance knowledge of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing or that they bungled a plan to substitute harmless powder for explosives."
The rest of the response was a lot of mumbo-jumbo about the known facts, but no acknowledgement of any info that supported my statement.
It's not a slam dunk, b/c the informant was recording his phone calls with the FBI w/o their knowledge. He made the accusation that they had ignored his offer of the substitution during a recorded phone call, and they neither confirmed it nor denied it.
Anyway.... I replied the Brave that though it said their was NO evidence, there in fact appeared to be SOME evidence, and included the link. Here's the first sentence of the reply: "The 1993 World Trade Center bombing was a terrorist attack that occurred on February 26, 1993, in New York City. According to the New York Post report, the FBI had an informant, Emad Salem, who was involved in the case and had warned the FBI about a potential bombing plot. However, the report also suggests that the FBI may have had some level of involvement in the bombing, with Salem claiming that the FBI had asked him to testify and that they had considered using a "phony powder" to fool the conspirators."
Again, a lot more additional verbiage, including the thing that Brave found persuasive: "It is worth noting that the FBI has denied any wrongdoing in the case, and the exact nature of their involvement is still a matter of debate. "
Well heck! The FBI denied it, so it must be false!
I've been having a running argument with my brother who thinks AI is awesome. He uses it to help him write software, and it's been a powerful tool for him. I wrote this to him: "Surely you already know, Google cooks its searches to make progressive thinking look good and conservative thinking look bad, or simply conceal facts that don’t support a woke narrative. When an LLM is “learning” it’s basically scouring the internet looking for related information, collects it and assigns weight, and then generates summary conclusions. But the primary source, that is, the entire internet, is biased. The bias is built in. Plus, the LLM developers are mostly woke, so their biases are embedded. "
My brother replied back, everybody knows it's biased, but he still advocates strongly for it.
I think AI can be a useful tool to knowledgeable people who know how to properly frame an inquiry, and who can evaluate the response. Unfortunately it's going to be used by people who can barely write their own name, and will take the AI response as if it were brought down from a mountain inscribed on stone tablets.
Saw the ousting of Mzzz Reid on Epoch Times report this morning. Looking for "The View" to wander their sorry you know whats out of the field of vision also. Another racket!!
On a brighter note, I got this email today related to several queries I sent off after the Chicken Vaccine post. For any and all who can find a store:
Hello Leigh,
We appreciate your taking the time to reach out to us regarding such an important matter. While we can't speak for products/brands that we do not carry, at Natural Grocers the quality of our products is our top priority and we assure you that we do not carry meats from livestock that have been treated with the mRNA vaccine.
Natural Grocers is in continuous communication with our meat vendors and farm partners and we have informed them that we will not be accepting meat from animals treated with the mRNA vaccine. So there is not now, nor will there be in the future, meat from animals who have received mRNA vaccines on our shelves. Additionally, our meat vendors and farm partners view this issue similarly to us, in that they are not interested in using this unknown mRNA vaccine when their animals already live natural healthy lives without it.
There is still a need for further research on the affects the mRNA vaccine has on livestock animals before we would carry livestock meat that has been treated with the mRNA vaccine. With our current understanding of the research, there is no overwhelming reason to use mRNA vaccines. In fact, many of the "problems" being treated primarily occur in conventional, crowded, unhealthy operations where animals are very susceptible to disease. None of our meat products come from these types of environments. We only source animals from farms where the animals have plenty of space, room to move, fresh bedding, clean air, and are not nearly as susceptible to disease because they actually live in a healthy environment to begin with.
Currently livestock animals receive all the medical care they require without an mRNA vaccine, thus there are no advantages/benefits from this type of vaccine for farmers to enforce the use of mRNA vaccines on their livestock.
Again, thank you for taking the time to reach out to us, we appreciate your patronage.
I haven't purchase beef at N.Grocers in a while, but last time, at least here locally, the beef Was Grass fed & Grass finished 100%. I mentioned Butcher Box in earlier post and they do the same GF & GF. FYI. Not so cheap as regular beef but my health worth eating less at a time, but making it quality. Again, as I've said "All food should be organic, period"!!!
I think I noted here before that I called Coca Cola's feedback line shortly after that House Committee hearing on GARM, led by Jim Jordan(?). To the credit of Coke, or at least this particular phone rep, they appeared to take my extended commentary with sobriety and professionalism. By contrast, when I called Unilever and made reference to their CEO's appearance during this same hearing, the phone rep didn't have any idea who or what I was talking about. Perhaps she specialized in antiperspirant products and ice cream.
Rachel Maddow Goes on Unhinged Rant, Attacks Her Own Network, Suggests MSNBC is Racist for Ousting Two ‘Non-White’ Hosts After Joy Reid’s Show Canceled...
"Rachel Maddow attacked her own network in a shocking monologue Monday evening and suggested MSNBC is racist for ousting two ‘non-white’ hosts after Joy Reid’s show, “The Reid Out,” was canceled.
NBC and MSNBC finally fired racist Joy Reid on Sunday. Trump destroyed the network for being an arm of the Democrat party and went off on Joy Reid.
“Lowlife Chairman of “Concast,” Brian Roberts, the owner of Ratings Challenged NBC and MSDNC, has finally gotten the nerve up to fire one of the least talented people in television, the mentally obnoxious racist, Joy Reid. Based on her ratings, which were virtually non-existent, she should have been “canned” long ago, along with everyone else who works there."
Back in 2023 I complained to wikipedia about it disparaging leaders of the anti covid Vax movement. Here is the BS response I got (probably automated). My original comment is at the bottom.
"Yamini L., Sep 26, 2023, 1:54 PM UTC:
Hi Fred,
Thank you for your email.
The Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to enable people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally. The Foundation does not endorse political candidates, or have an agenda other than our mission. The idea of a neutral point of view is one of our core principles.
Wikipedia is a global project managed by tens of thousands of volunteers from around the world. Many people do not know this, but the Wikimedia Foundation does not control or edit the content of Wikipedia. We are here primarily to provide infrastructure and support the volunteer community. They are people from virtually all walks of life, who edit and contribute everyday, and they reflect a vast number of viewpoints. There is no central editorial board; all edits are made by individual members of the Wikipedia community.
The volunteer editors appreciate hearing viewpoints about content, and value input from readers that can help improve the quality of information. If you have specific corrections or facts to offer, volunteers require citations or facts from reliable, high-quality sources to review and improve the information. You can learn more about how misinformation is addressed on Wikipedia in this one-minute video.
Wikipedia volunteers are strongly focused on the editorial values of non-censorship, neutrality, verifiability, and what is termed 'no original research.' All volunteers invested in the quality of Wikipedia are working collectively to build balanced, neutral articles that reflect a variety of perspectives on often complex, high-profile topics. Content and information can change quickly to reflect world events and new facts.
Clicking on the 'View history' tab of an article will display the edit history of that article with associated comments. For controversial or contested articles, clicking on the Talk Page can often provide more context about how the article was created, and will show any debates among the editors.
For any further questions about Wikipedia content or guidelines, please contact info@wikimedia.org, an email address answered by longtime project editors with vast editorial experience.
Thanks again for reaching out to share your views.
understand that your information will be processed by the Zendesk Group
in accordance with Zendesk’s terms. Users from the following countries should consult Section 13 of Zendesk’s privacy policy
for more information about Zendesk’s country-specific practices:
Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, and Singapore.
Fred Jewett, Sep 20, 2023, 8:15 PM UTC:
I am very disappointed the Wikipedia has been rewriting history to favour a leftist agenda. When I go to look at biographies of some people trying to stop the killer covid vaccine I see they are disparaged.
I cannot donate until you get history correct. Fix it.
Currently I consider AI to be the same as MSM and the Gov, as it does not have common sense or can AI think for itself, because it can only consider what was input into its database which is no more trustworthy.
Yes, its called GARBAGE IN - GARBAGE OUT!
Simple and extremely accurate.
It should be noted that a person I follow (Courtney Brown) did a recent show featuring two AI Large Language Models (Google's Gemini and X's Grok) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZJEM5RnqGQ . He asked each of these models a set of identical questions. They came out quite different, but it was obvious that both models were curated and biased in favor of "the official government explanation."
At my church, it is a crime to enter false data into a computer. It is too bad this rule is not more widely practiced. Of course, a lot depends on who gets to decide "false" versus "true." But if you could come up with a system where all reasonable "truths" were honored, you wouldn't have the horrific results that we see now.
Yes, I view AI much like TikTok and mainstream media. Hopefully if we don't use it, it will go away or will have regulations.
Google any medical related issue and you get a very biased menu. According to this article, AI is being used as a faster more sophisticated propaganda tool. We need legal regulations to halt information bias, allowing open access to opposing viewpoints from alternative databases. Otherwise, information will not reflect reality, and eventually everyone will fall into the ditch. A con job can only last so long without dire consequences.
I only wish that "a con job can only last so long" I have seen many last centuries, and they are swallowed 'hook line and sinker'.
"Now dem good fish bites when you gots good bait......
just a little tip that i'd like to relate.....
Many fish bites when you gots good bait!
I'm a goin fishin, yes i'm goin fishin.....and muh babies goin fishin too."
True. I was thinking about that this morning. I am reading a book on how different cultures throughout history have viewed death and the aftermath if there is one. Plato took the idea from Socrates of an eternal soul. The Hebrews did not view the body and soul as separate, and unlike the Greeks did not believe the soul lived on in 'hell or heaven' yet that is the notion adopted by the Christian church. Yet, millions of people have been indoctrinated with this idea for a long time. We are all so indoctrinated by those who came before us, hard to parse out what is really true.
Results will tell us what is true. Some think Trump is a tyrant, some think he will drain the swamp....time will tell.
And I'm not cellebrating till time tells
Rita, as you may have guessed by now, I have come to read and search out people who are in touch with a higher source of information. And they need to be tried and true for me to pay much attention. Edgar Cayce was one of the first, even my mother read him. I know personally Dannion Brinkley, and have worked with him on hospice. There is a book by Levi Dowling, "the Aquarian Gospel of Jesus Christ" and "Testimony of Light" Helen Greaves. Sounds like you are a reader and not afraid to look outside the usual info. Take a peek...
Edgar Cayce was a true healer, who could 'see' beyond the material plane of existence. I read years ago 'There is a river', I forget it though. As a child my father told me stories about Biddy Early and brought me to her tiny little house which at that point was run down. It was fascinating to hear how she healed those before they even arrived at her house, and she focused her healing intention using a blue bottle. I think information acquired through dreams, day visions, or simply intuition is deeper and broader to the limited intellect. I am still not clear though on whether any part of the individual remains without the brain. I know we can communicate psychically with the hardware interface of the brain, instantly no matter the distance, or even before an event, I don't know how consciousness works without that interface in terms of the individual.
I'm not sure what you mean about the brain, when Dannion was DOA he still had his spiritual awareness and brought the memory back. Not too many people have a true death, mostly "near-death".
What I'm saying is our brain can connect with everything outside of space and time, but what is it that connects without the brain? I just don't understand how it works. Where is the information of consciousness concentrated for transmission. These are very heady questions, I don't expect you to know. Few do I imagine.
I'll give you my best shot, Rita. The soul and spiritual consciousness don't reside in the brain. Awareness is not limited to the brain either. The crown chakra is where we exit the body as far as I can tell. When My mother appeared to me in a dream and the same night appeared to my son in a different location after her "death" She conveyed to me that she had made the transition and all was well. My son saw her in the same 'rejuvenated body' as I call it, looking the same as her most vital years. Eight other people have appeared to me after their transition and two before. These have all been verified by family members as to the accuracy of my experience. I couldn't make this stuff up if I tried...
Right the soul is not 'in' the brain, but yet the brain is an interface. So, there was an energetic image of your mother that arrived via your brain, I guess the brain, which is made of a denser frequency of matter, can transduce information from the higher frequencies. I have many similar experiences as you occurring since I was a teen. If I did not have such experiences, I think I would not see beyond the material level. Even though 'material' is still mostly space.
DD, please explain some more about these two sources,thx.
Pretty-red, have you tried using the search function on your computer?
Which two, I list four.
it appears to be two to me:
There is a 1) book by Levi Dowling, "the Aquarian Gospel of Jesus Christ" and 2)"Testimony of Light" Helen Greaves.
Yes, and Dannion has written several books as well as hundreds of books from Cayce's readings. Levi got the information during the "Quiet Hours" 3-4 in the morning. There is quite the extensive introduction by his wife Eva. Copyright 1907. Testimony of Light given to Helen from Frances Banks, M.A. a former nun who got a calling to leave the order. This is the testimony of Francis from the "other side". Copyright 1967.
Yandex.com, for the most part (in my experience) provides alternative viewpoints, MOST of the time
Yaaaa, from Russia with love, and not the same axe to grind as Google. Yandex was a main power behind Duck Duck Go when the latter started out.
IIRC, didnt Gates buy DDG ?
No end to their attempts to control all narratives
My training and background centered on computers and weapons. Later I retired and wrote books. Novels about "the hero's journey" -- A huge genre from Beowulf to Star Wars, but one now suppressed.
"It is clear that AI is going to dominate our online lives and if those AI Language models are fed garbage, then the history books will be written to reflect that vomitus. But if the competitive playing field is even, eventually non-biased or conservatively biased AI Language models will be developed and enabled - as long as there is a market for such. That is how capitalism works.
However, the tech industry is dominated by progressives. Those very progressives who run monopolies like Google. It is this inherent bias of the internet, combined with the censorship, that worries those of us who believe in free speech."
I agree. GIGO -- garbage in, garbage out, but AI can make it much faster, better, and more appealing. Be careful what you wish for.
https://www.johntrudel.com
Progressivism = COMMUNISM
This I picked up in the past week. Nathaniel Rothschild ended his request by stating: "Without Ukraine the global order may not survive". He stated Russia must be brought to its knees. He wanted funding to not stop. 650,000 Ukrainian military dead (best stat I could find from foreign sources).
Globalism is another form of communism.
The "End-Game" of socialism/communism is IDENTICAL, that being ABSOLUTE control of the "means of production" on a GLOBAL scale by International Socialism/Communism; with the three main elements (globally) of the means of production being: (1. ALL land and water, (2. ALL labor (humanity), and (3. MONEY in whatever form be it gold, silver, paper money or DIGITAL.
Do we need the global order to survive? What has it done for us lately?
Well now, they have continuously tried to enslave us peasants. Isn't that benevolent enough ?
Those who know real history want no part of their Global Order. As Tom Daniel said (above) I will add that the end game is a totalitarian surveillance state.
Klaus Schwab made it clear that the world needs the globalists' Great Reset.
Schwab and his elites (most of whom stay out of the eye of the public) want to destroy our cultures and our concept of family and country. This is why they send millions of people from cultures totally different from ours to Europe, the USA, Australia, and New Zealand to wreak havoc.
If you know the patterns in history you can predict what will go on.
Amsel Mayer Rothschild conspired with French Grand Freemasons to stage a Revolution in France and he wanted it to start in 1789.
The past four years in America have been absolute chaos and lawlessness. Cooperating with the globalists is this Deep State which does what these elite globalist billionaires want.
These past four years under the psychopathic, demented Joe Biden have been utter insanity - ending free speech, arresting innocent people who did not agree with Democrat Party terror (and include RINOs), opening the US borders, letting Antifa and BLM riot in the cities and towns, and supporting horrific wars in the mid east and in the Ukraine. These progressives are doing exactly what Lenin, Trotsky, Mao Zedong, Saul Alinsky, and many others did. You create chaos to destroy/subdue, frighten people.
Everything is an INVERSION (those who follow the satanic know that inversions are essential).
These tactics have been going on for hundreds of years- the patterns are similar.
William Guy Carr's book Pawns In The Game gives a good view of what has gone on since the mid 1600s when Oliver Cromwell accepted money from a Dutch money lender. I have read dozens of other books and hundreds of papers by brilliant men and women and they all confirm how psychopathic politicians and money people want to rule the world.
What Nathaniel Rothschild said stunned me because he said it so openly. The USA pushed Russia into invading the Ukraine. Fantastic sums of money keep pouring in to the Ukraine so you know something really big is at stake for these Globalists. Rothschild also said to "step up information warfare to correct opinion, especially online, and send weaponry to our friends in Ukraine".
It was just easy for many of us to see what was going on. This is what sociopaths and psychopaths do. These Globalists can crash economies too,
We can beat them.
I was stunned when I saw
The message from Nathaniel Rothschild was stunning because he is practically admitting
I found a statement a few days back wherein Nathaniel Rothschild said that Ukraine is an essential piece in the geopolitical chess board
And these sociopaths took over the educational system just as Marx, Lenin, Mao, and many others recommended.
You know these globalists are sick when they insist that perverting children should be part of all cultures.
John, would you think, based on your background that one could develop a series of questions to feed an AI source that would basically reveal its calibration or, even ideally, to force calibrate it.
-- questions about the most biased genre's that push it to talk on those areas and reveal bias?
-- questions that feed it additional info followed by questions to determine if it utilized that info vs before feeding it?
-- feed specific info to different AI sources before asking the same question in multiple ways; analyze responses to compare the different AI's
-- some combo of above to get ALL AI sources(say, compare 2 or 3) to vomit the SAME response.
Yes, probably best to test AI bots against each other. See what results they favor. Same with search engines.
We knew it was bad, but we did NOT know just how bad, hollow, demeaning, vile, or embedded. Keep shining the light; thank you!
I find it very difficult to use search engines to find articles that don't all follow the same line. I know there are other opinions, but DuckDuckGo is front end loaded with the gatekeepers.
Did you read Carville thinks the Trump administration will collapse in less than 30 days? What is he getting wind of that the WH is unaware of or is he trying to push a narrative to build 'civil disobedience'?
Well, progressivism is itself a form of civil disobedience. Nothing civil about it.
Everything is upside down. People think 'accountability' is inhumane.
Who gives a crap WHAT Carville "thinks" ?
He still has a BIG voice.
naw.
People looking at him cussing and acting superior on recent "moments" and see he is just a mean old boomer who can't give up. Most Dems probably can't stand him and Conservatives like to laugh at him.
LDT - Rats! So then what search engine do you think is less worse than DDGo?
I don’t know, honestly.
For me, the best search engine is Yandex. It is the only one I use now.
You use a 3/4 owned Russian search engine? I think the Russians are known to censor even more than the US.
I do realize that it is predominantly owned by Russians. However, they are far less likely to censor anything. At least that has been my experience after using them for a least a year or more. I have found things using Yandex that I would be completely unable to find elsewhere.
Carville IS entertaining to some degree, but he spews many unfounded theories. He’s disappointed I believe.
I'm an outcast. Not a team player. Been this way my whole life.
Coulda been a HELL'S ANGEL in Oakland.....but my Mom wouldn't let me have the biggest bike.
All kidding aside I have a lapel button on my leather jacket that says...
"I am the person your mother warned you about!"
I'll try and find one to send over your way Dr. Malone.
It's a conversation starter and often an ender....
I just bought a hat 2 yrs ago: "I will NOT Comply."
Just like the Lion King.🤨
I talked to Sonny Barger from his prison on a New Years, no kidding aside...
That's amazing...poor guy
Three hots and a cot.
Only you Kiddo...
Only you DD. 🤣👍
Ratings, Eyeballs, Targeting ads to the coveted 25-54 audience was how I made a living for 30 years. I got out of the tv, radio and internet ad sales business 15 years ago. It was a dirty business even back then, but it paid well. I feel healthier and much cleaner now.
A problem I have with AI is that we are being told it can be humanized in its "thinking". But much of our intellectual output is directly and indirectly influenced by our 5 senses none of which are shared by machines and certainly not by any combination of them acting in concert. So its thinking can only at best be a poor approximation of human thought.
Agreed! Our whole society has been fed lies, which support commercial l interests. . If there is no truth to input, how could even AI come up with answers?
Thank you for this discussion. Surely points we need to keep in mind.
One of the doctors appearing on a recent FLCCC presentation opined she would not use AI generated medical materials. She anticipates HHS groupthink will be the source of content. She believes other info and opinions will not be a part of the training. From what you report, it appears outsiders will be unable to add to systems fund of knowledge.
Today I heard 2 commercials (WBAL) hawking the virtues of glycosphate (sp) so we can be assured sufficient food can be grown to feed us all.
i damaged one of my 2 phones and am looking into replacing it. Samsung has partnered with Google. From the sound of it, Google is busy building,
tentacles into all possible apps. In my personal opinion Google is highly unlikely to be the only Tech pursuing such ends. They offer an AI system. Anyone trying to assure AIs will offer a level playing field has a huge challenge ahead.
I surely appreciate you're keeping us abreast of these issues!
Roger Houston....copy that... over and Reidout......
I had an experience with AI almost identical to Dr. Malone's. "
I had listed this, along w/ several other FBI blunders, on X: "1993 World Trade Center bombing (FBI had advance knowledge of bombing, and bungled a plan to substitute harmless powder for explosives)"
I was challenged on it, and sought to find some reporting on it. I had always considered Brave to be a neutral search engine that protects privacy, and did a search there. This is the first sentence of a verbose AI-generated response: "There is no credible evidence to support the claim that the FBI had advance knowledge of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing or that they bungled a plan to substitute harmless powder for explosives."
The rest of the response was a lot of mumbo-jumbo about the known facts, but no acknowledgement of any info that supported my statement.
In the meantime, I found through another search engine a NY Post article, at least in part confirming that FBI had ignored an informant who offered to substitute harmless powder for explosives. https://nypost.com/2023/02/26/1993-world-trade-center-attack-was-fbis-biggest-bomb/
It's not a slam dunk, b/c the informant was recording his phone calls with the FBI w/o their knowledge. He made the accusation that they had ignored his offer of the substitution during a recorded phone call, and they neither confirmed it nor denied it.
Anyway.... I replied the Brave that though it said their was NO evidence, there in fact appeared to be SOME evidence, and included the link. Here's the first sentence of the reply: "The 1993 World Trade Center bombing was a terrorist attack that occurred on February 26, 1993, in New York City. According to the New York Post report, the FBI had an informant, Emad Salem, who was involved in the case and had warned the FBI about a potential bombing plot. However, the report also suggests that the FBI may have had some level of involvement in the bombing, with Salem claiming that the FBI had asked him to testify and that they had considered using a "phony powder" to fool the conspirators."
Again, a lot more additional verbiage, including the thing that Brave found persuasive: "It is worth noting that the FBI has denied any wrongdoing in the case, and the exact nature of their involvement is still a matter of debate. "
Well heck! The FBI denied it, so it must be false!
I've been having a running argument with my brother who thinks AI is awesome. He uses it to help him write software, and it's been a powerful tool for him. I wrote this to him: "Surely you already know, Google cooks its searches to make progressive thinking look good and conservative thinking look bad, or simply conceal facts that don’t support a woke narrative. When an LLM is “learning” it’s basically scouring the internet looking for related information, collects it and assigns weight, and then generates summary conclusions. But the primary source, that is, the entire internet, is biased. The bias is built in. Plus, the LLM developers are mostly woke, so their biases are embedded. "
My brother replied back, everybody knows it's biased, but he still advocates strongly for it.
I think AI can be a useful tool to knowledgeable people who know how to properly frame an inquiry, and who can evaluate the response. Unfortunately it's going to be used by people who can barely write their own name, and will take the AI response as if it were brought down from a mountain inscribed on stone tablets.
Saw the ousting of Mzzz Reid on Epoch Times report this morning. Looking for "The View" to wander their sorry you know whats out of the field of vision also. Another racket!!
On a brighter note, I got this email today related to several queries I sent off after the Chicken Vaccine post. For any and all who can find a store:
Hello Leigh,
We appreciate your taking the time to reach out to us regarding such an important matter. While we can't speak for products/brands that we do not carry, at Natural Grocers the quality of our products is our top priority and we assure you that we do not carry meats from livestock that have been treated with the mRNA vaccine.
Natural Grocers is in continuous communication with our meat vendors and farm partners and we have informed them that we will not be accepting meat from animals treated with the mRNA vaccine. So there is not now, nor will there be in the future, meat from animals who have received mRNA vaccines on our shelves. Additionally, our meat vendors and farm partners view this issue similarly to us, in that they are not interested in using this unknown mRNA vaccine when their animals already live natural healthy lives without it.
There is still a need for further research on the affects the mRNA vaccine has on livestock animals before we would carry livestock meat that has been treated with the mRNA vaccine. With our current understanding of the research, there is no overwhelming reason to use mRNA vaccines. In fact, many of the "problems" being treated primarily occur in conventional, crowded, unhealthy operations where animals are very susceptible to disease. None of our meat products come from these types of environments. We only source animals from farms where the animals have plenty of space, room to move, fresh bedding, clean air, and are not nearly as susceptible to disease because they actually live in a healthy environment to begin with.
Currently livestock animals receive all the medical care they require without an mRNA vaccine, thus there are no advantages/benefits from this type of vaccine for farmers to enforce the use of mRNA vaccines on their livestock.
Again, thank you for taking the time to reach out to us, we appreciate your patronage.
Sincerely,
Leah
This is so good to know, Thanx!
Better, but best is pastured beef - not raised in barns.
I haven't purchase beef at N.Grocers in a while, but last time, at least here locally, the beef Was Grass fed & Grass finished 100%. I mentioned Butcher Box in earlier post and they do the same GF & GF. FYI. Not so cheap as regular beef but my health worth eating less at a time, but making it quality. Again, as I've said "All food should be organic, period"!!!
That is great info, thanks!
I think I noted here before that I called Coca Cola's feedback line shortly after that House Committee hearing on GARM, led by Jim Jordan(?). To the credit of Coke, or at least this particular phone rep, they appeared to take my extended commentary with sobriety and professionalism. By contrast, when I called Unilever and made reference to their CEO's appearance during this same hearing, the phone rep didn't have any idea who or what I was talking about. Perhaps she specialized in antiperspirant products and ice cream.
Rachel Maddow Goes on Unhinged Rant, Attacks Her Own Network, Suggests MSNBC is Racist for Ousting Two ‘Non-White’ Hosts After Joy Reid’s Show Canceled...
"Rachel Maddow attacked her own network in a shocking monologue Monday evening and suggested MSNBC is racist for ousting two ‘non-white’ hosts after Joy Reid’s show, “The Reid Out,” was canceled.
NBC and MSNBC finally fired racist Joy Reid on Sunday. Trump destroyed the network for being an arm of the Democrat party and went off on Joy Reid.
“Lowlife Chairman of “Concast,” Brian Roberts, the owner of Ratings Challenged NBC and MSDNC, has finally gotten the nerve up to fire one of the least talented people in television, the mentally obnoxious racist, Joy Reid. Based on her ratings, which were virtually non-existent, she should have been “canned” long ago, along with everyone else who works there."
https://x.com/GuntherEagleman/status/1894213903661388256
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/02/whoa-rachel-maddow-goes-unhinged-rant-attacks-her/
Back in 2023 I complained to wikipedia about it disparaging leaders of the anti covid Vax movement. Here is the BS response I got (probably automated). My original comment is at the bottom.
"Yamini L., Sep 26, 2023, 1:54 PM UTC:
Hi Fred,
Thank you for your email.
The Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to enable people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally. The Foundation does not endorse political candidates, or have an agenda other than our mission. The idea of a neutral point of view is one of our core principles.
Wikipedia is a global project managed by tens of thousands of volunteers from around the world. Many people do not know this, but the Wikimedia Foundation does not control or edit the content of Wikipedia. We are here primarily to provide infrastructure and support the volunteer community. They are people from virtually all walks of life, who edit and contribute everyday, and they reflect a vast number of viewpoints. There is no central editorial board; all edits are made by individual members of the Wikipedia community.
The volunteer editors appreciate hearing viewpoints about content, and value input from readers that can help improve the quality of information. If you have specific corrections or facts to offer, volunteers require citations or facts from reliable, high-quality sources to review and improve the information. You can learn more about how misinformation is addressed on Wikipedia in this one-minute video.
Wikipedia volunteers are strongly focused on the editorial values of non-censorship, neutrality, verifiability, and what is termed 'no original research.' All volunteers invested in the quality of Wikipedia are working collectively to build balanced, neutral articles that reflect a variety of perspectives on often complex, high-profile topics. Content and information can change quickly to reflect world events and new facts.
Clicking on the 'View history' tab of an article will display the edit history of that article with associated comments. For controversial or contested articles, clicking on the Talk Page can often provide more context about how the article was created, and will show any debates among the editors.
For any further questions about Wikipedia content or guidelines, please contact info@wikimedia.org, an email address answered by longtime project editors with vast editorial experience.
Thanks again for reaching out to share your views.
Sincerely,
Yamini L.
Donor Relations Specialist
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
wikimediafoundation.org
Support us! https://donate.wikimedia.org
Due to the volume of inquiries we receive, we use Zendesk
as a donor response platform. By emailing donate@wikimedia.org, you
understand that your information will be processed by the Zendesk Group
in accordance with Zendesk’s terms. Users from the following countries should consult Section 13 of Zendesk’s privacy policy
for more information about Zendesk’s country-specific practices:
Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, and Singapore.
Fred Jewett, Sep 20, 2023, 8:15 PM UTC:
I am very disappointed the Wikipedia has been rewriting history to favour a leftist agenda. When I go to look at biographies of some people trying to stop the killer covid vaccine I see they are disparaged.
I cannot donate until you get history correct. Fix it.
Fred Jewett"
Couldn’t have stated it better . . . “Garbage in garbage out. . .”. I’m not at all interested in AI yet. I trust it as much as I trust MSM. No thanks