56 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

This review, to me, sounds the importance of viewing government direction/persciptions as relates to political motivations.

Again, in this context, the timing of the C19 pandemic has to be suspect.

To fast forward to today - in the last week, I read an article on current Government recommendations as relates to Covid. As I understand it it's that seniors should get two (booster?)shots a year, with the first now. Everyone else should receive one (booster?) shot a year going forward.

That, in the face of all that has been objectively established, these recommendations persist (to me) screams of political motivations. This article covers many of them. Surely the current Administration would want to avoid any implications of wrongs and impacts of its Covid prescriptions to date.

This Administration, in league with HHS and resources of the intelligence communities, aims to project a picture of competence and credibility as relates to public health.

Buyers (fellow citizens) beware. Review what's know. Think critically about the direction to take in pursuit of better outcomes. Cast one's vote to support that goal.

Thank you to our most valued Docters for all your contributions to our funds of knowledge! It's invaluable and much appreciated!

Expand full comment

Ya think that older folks vote more conservative might play a role in those recommended jabs for old folks?

Expand full comment

Damn Right! The very personification of 'garbage' to be disposed of. One suspects JBs retrenching relates to his realization he's a part of the garbage to be disposed of?

Expand full comment