267 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

My husband has COPD, age 80. We have friends in their 90s. All our elderly friends had the first Covid shot and 2 boosters. None died or had a negative reaction. I agree it should not have been mandated. I'm interested in the findings regarding the effects on young people. My children were pin cushions up until age 2. No negative reactions. However everyone is different. The reason it takes about 5 years to adequately test a drug prior to FDA approval. Everyone knew COVID was fast tracked and impossible for it to have been adequately tested. FdA approved it anyway. So blame them and our politicians. I was born in 1946. In the 50s we all received Polio vaccine. I don't know anyone who had Polio. When we immigrated to the USA in 1959 certain vaccines were mandatory for entrance. I'm curious about claims that certain vaccines cause autism etc. I believe the claim should be looked into. My daughter works for Abbott. She is the first to admitt no way was the COVID vaccine properly tested.

Expand full comment

The thing with serious side effects to the COVID vaccine is that it is 1/500. Doesn't sound like a high percentage but it is when you mandate the shot. It means that a significant number of people will be seriously injured or killed from a vaccine that has very questionable benefits.

For every other medication that would be enough to have it taken off of the market. So people were killed because of political choices that were made.

As far as vaccines and autism goes, it it nearly impossible to definitively link a single vaccine to autism. I see patients in the clinic where I work. Some are taking about 15 different medications.

You're lucky if somebody discovers 2 medications that should not be taken together, let alone a dozen of them.

TBH, I'm OK with all of this when there is no coersion and not mandates for any vaccination/medication.

Some people aren't smart enough to figure these things out and that's the price you pay when you put your trust in the system.

I trusted the system because I didn't know how corrupt the system is. Yes, I was naiive and it disturbs me to know how gullible I was at my age. I have no excuse. Given enough time and effort I can figure out most scientific papers. But now that I know about the lies, I won't even give it a second look.

I assume that they are lying. That is perhaps too cynical of me and maybe it isn't even good for me but that's where I'm at. I assume that they are actively lying or at the very least, they are not revealing all that they know.

That's unforgivable.

Expand full comment

Like you, I trusted those I pay to advise. Took two before there was data. Saw the data and rejected any more.

Expand full comment