Thanks for sharing this eloquent and elegant call to protect our defenseless young. It is as rational as it is profound, and moving.
Event 201 "predicted" the emergence of Covid-19 with clairvoyant accuracy. "They" just held another war-games exercise this October, labeling it "Catastrophic Contagion." To prepare for another pandemic mor…
Thanks for sharing this eloquent and elegant call to protect our defenseless young. It is as rational as it is profound, and moving.
Event 201 "predicted" the emergence of Covid-19 with clairvoyant accuracy. "They" just held another war-games exercise this October, labeling it "Catastrophic Contagion." To prepare for another pandemic more lethal than Covid, which disproportionately targets the YOUNG. Isn't it time we start taking "them" at their word? And prepare, if they're "preparing"?
This exercise chose Severe Epidemic Enterovirus Respiratory Syndrome as the pathogen "coming to your neighborhood, SOON." Just as the general populace is starting realize the first pandemic was greatly exaggerated, unleashing another genuinely more lethal than Covid would frighten most people back into compliance, and silence dissent. To me, "they" have more incentive for this next pandemic, to quash the mounting evidence and growing movement to hold them accountable for creating the first one. Am I just being paranoid?
Data on the devastation to fertility and pregnancy by the Covid vaxxes is now piling in, but if the Genocidal Globalists (GGs) are concerned the vaxxes didn't reduce global population enough, or curb human procreation sufficiently, killing or sterilizing people of child-bearing age would finish the job. Perhaps SEERS is what they plan to use, for that. Or something else. But had we taken Ivermectin and/or other anti-viral protocols as prophylaxis, there would have been no Covid-19. Aren't we being warned what's next? Should we maybe think about how to get ahead of it, if possible?
Enteroviruses A71 and A6 cause hand, foot and mouth disease. Enterovirus D68 is the respiratory version. If indeed SEERS is the next weaponized virus planned for release, can we start testing some anti-virals, in vitro at least, for efficacy against D68? Does anyone in our community have experience with that virus?
Another pathogen that historically and surprisingly felled young, healthy people (of reproductive age) was the Spanish Flu. (Though it wasn't "Spanish," and many deaths may have resulted from "treatment" with mercury and other poisons.) We know the biowarfare community resurrected that original strain, and it is held in inventory at several BSL-4s. Having contracted descendants of the Spanish Flu, many people likely have at least some immunity to it. A weaponized version would have to circumvent that acquired immunity.
We know Coronavirus gain-of-function research began many years prior to its release in 2019. If the "next one" is being prepared right now, it's in progress in a BSL-4 somewhere. Someone at DTRA, or another agency tied to "national security" will know. And certainly at Pfizer or Moderna, who will likely be handed the virus's genome so they can create a new vax "at the speed of science." Much easier to do, when you already have the viral code, as they did with SARS CoV-2. Moderna may have patented its furin cleavage site. That could be the true basis for their patent beef with Pfizer.
One of the more surprising things about the GGs is: they publicly announce what they're going to do. Do we ignore this, at our own peril? If Covid-19 was the trial run to test pathogenicity, and issue vax batches of varying concentration to research effects of LNP and mRNA, "they" may have learned a lot. The vast difference in AEs between different batches of the Covid vaxes may simply have been failures of GMP. But -- shouldn't we consider this may have been planned? We complained that the vax rollout was really Phase III, and it was -- for possibly a very different reason than we knew.
Fast-replicating, highly-lethal pathogens like Ebola tend to kill their hosts quickly, and burn out. "They" need to get the mix for the next one just right; optimum replication/transmissibility, with just the right threshold of lethality. They need an excuse to let it spread to pandemic level, so it preferably won't be a Coronavirus, for which they should be able to create a new vax quickly. It should be from a different viral family.
If this is coming, someone knows. Maybe the Whistleblower from EcoHealthAlliance helping Thomas Renz with his DOD lawsuit has an inkling, from his Echo history. Or someone from DTRA, BARDA, GAVI, BMGF, Pfizer or Moderna whose Kool Aid is finally wearing off, and is growing a conscience.
The GGs new wargame "predicted" a more lethal virus. And everything they've said and done so far was precisely indicative of what came next. If anyone in our community might have a contact that can give them insight into which pathogen is being weaponized as their next darling, maybe the virologists/ epidemiologists on our side can do some quiet research. And we could potentially stop it in its tracks.
If they're following pattern, the GGs have given us the gift of an early warning: Round2 will be worse than Round1. Their pretend target: 2025. But should their International Health Treaty need an extra push to pass, my guess is it will be sooner. And because of the groundswell now growing against them, perhaps MUCH sooner.
Maybe we should thank them for the gift. And try to prepare.
Thanks for sharing this eloquent and elegant call to protect our defenseless young. It is as rational as it is profound, and moving.
Event 201 "predicted" the emergence of Covid-19 with clairvoyant accuracy. "They" just held another war-games exercise this October, labeling it "Catastrophic Contagion." To prepare for another pandemic more lethal than Covid, which disproportionately targets the YOUNG. Isn't it time we start taking "them" at their word? And prepare, if they're "preparing"?
This exercise chose Severe Epidemic Enterovirus Respiratory Syndrome as the pathogen "coming to your neighborhood, SOON." Just as the general populace is starting realize the first pandemic was greatly exaggerated, unleashing another genuinely more lethal than Covid would frighten most people back into compliance, and silence dissent. To me, "they" have more incentive for this next pandemic, to quash the mounting evidence and growing movement to hold them accountable for creating the first one. Am I just being paranoid?
Data on the devastation to fertility and pregnancy by the Covid vaxxes is now piling in, but if the Genocidal Globalists (GGs) are concerned the vaxxes didn't reduce global population enough, or curb human procreation sufficiently, killing or sterilizing people of child-bearing age would finish the job. Perhaps SEERS is what they plan to use, for that. Or something else. But had we taken Ivermectin and/or other anti-viral protocols as prophylaxis, there would have been no Covid-19. Aren't we being warned what's next? Should we maybe think about how to get ahead of it, if possible?
Enteroviruses A71 and A6 cause hand, foot and mouth disease. Enterovirus D68 is the respiratory version. If indeed SEERS is the next weaponized virus planned for release, can we start testing some anti-virals, in vitro at least, for efficacy against D68? Does anyone in our community have experience with that virus?
Another pathogen that historically and surprisingly felled young, healthy people (of reproductive age) was the Spanish Flu. (Though it wasn't "Spanish," and many deaths may have resulted from "treatment" with mercury and other poisons.) We know the biowarfare community resurrected that original strain, and it is held in inventory at several BSL-4s. Having contracted descendants of the Spanish Flu, many people likely have at least some immunity to it. A weaponized version would have to circumvent that acquired immunity.
We know Coronavirus gain-of-function research began many years prior to its release in 2019. If the "next one" is being prepared right now, it's in progress in a BSL-4 somewhere. Someone at DTRA, or another agency tied to "national security" will know. And certainly at Pfizer or Moderna, who will likely be handed the virus's genome so they can create a new vax "at the speed of science." Much easier to do, when you already have the viral code, as they did with SARS CoV-2. Moderna may have patented its furin cleavage site. That could be the true basis for their patent beef with Pfizer.
One of the more surprising things about the GGs is: they publicly announce what they're going to do. Do we ignore this, at our own peril? If Covid-19 was the trial run to test pathogenicity, and issue vax batches of varying concentration to research effects of LNP and mRNA, "they" may have learned a lot. The vast difference in AEs between different batches of the Covid vaxes may simply have been failures of GMP. But -- shouldn't we consider this may have been planned? We complained that the vax rollout was really Phase III, and it was -- for possibly a very different reason than we knew.
Fast-replicating, highly-lethal pathogens like Ebola tend to kill their hosts quickly, and burn out. "They" need to get the mix for the next one just right; optimum replication/transmissibility, with just the right threshold of lethality. They need an excuse to let it spread to pandemic level, so it preferably won't be a Coronavirus, for which they should be able to create a new vax quickly. It should be from a different viral family.
If this is coming, someone knows. Maybe the Whistleblower from EcoHealthAlliance helping Thomas Renz with his DOD lawsuit has an inkling, from his Echo history. Or someone from DTRA, BARDA, GAVI, BMGF, Pfizer or Moderna whose Kool Aid is finally wearing off, and is growing a conscience.
The GGs new wargame "predicted" a more lethal virus. And everything they've said and done so far was precisely indicative of what came next. If anyone in our community might have a contact that can give them insight into which pathogen is being weaponized as their next darling, maybe the virologists/ epidemiologists on our side can do some quiet research. And we could potentially stop it in its tracks.
If they're following pattern, the GGs have given us the gift of an early warning: Round2 will be worse than Round1. Their pretend target: 2025. But should their International Health Treaty need an extra push to pass, my guess is it will be sooner. And because of the groundswell now growing against them, perhaps MUCH sooner.
Maybe we should thank them for the gift. And try to prepare.