OK..I guess. That does not sound like what I read in Texas Minute but…. The emphasis of the article was that passing that omnibus bill without a quorum invalidated it. Hmmmm. Suspect that single part was chosen to combat that stinking “standing” b.s. that SCOTUS claimed they did not have when they were there claiming Texans votes in 20 were canceled by fraud.
OK..I guess. That does not sound like what I read in Texas Minute but…. The emphasis of the article was that passing that omnibus bill without a quorum invalidated it. Hmmmm. Suspect that single part was chosen to combat that stinking “standing” b.s. that SCOTUS claimed they did not have when they were there claiming Texans votes in 20 were canceled by fraud.
OK..I guess. That does not sound like what I read in Texas Minute but…. The emphasis of the article was that passing that omnibus bill without a quorum invalidated it. Hmmmm. Suspect that single part was chosen to combat that stinking “standing” b.s. that SCOTUS claimed they did not have when they were there claiming Texans votes in 20 were canceled by fraud.
I think you nailed it. I wonder if the Biteme admin will care to appeal - bet not if it puts the entire bill at stake.