We need to appoint extremely brave Judges to SCOTUS. I mean really, really brave people. I like our Republican SCOTUS Judges, but I didn't expect Kavanaugh and Barrett to allow themselves to be so intimidated.
We need to appoint extremely brave Judges to SCOTUS. I mean really, really brave people. I like our Republican SCOTUS Judges, but I didn't expect Kavanaugh and Barrett to allow themselves to be so intimidated.
Unfortunately, Jennifer, "We" don't have the opportunity to appoint SCOTUS Justices; and almost as ALWAYS is the case, so-called "Republicans" in the Senate rubber stamp whomever the so-called "Democrats" (read Liberals, Progressives, Socialists & Communists) who identify themselves as "Democrats" - INCLUDING some RINO "Republicans" choices for that highest of judicial office.
Rather than lifetime TENURE, it would be nice if SCOTUS "justices" faced ANNUAL REVIEW and re election - or NOT - BY "We the People" - which would no doubt take a Constitutional Amendment - which CONGRESS would NEVER allow.
We need to appoint extremely brave Judges to SCOTUS. I mean really, really brave people. I like our Republican SCOTUS Judges, but I didn't expect Kavanaugh and Barrett to allow themselves to be so intimidated.
Unfortunately, Jennifer, "We" don't have the opportunity to appoint SCOTUS Justices; and almost as ALWAYS is the case, so-called "Republicans" in the Senate rubber stamp whomever the so-called "Democrats" (read Liberals, Progressives, Socialists & Communists) who identify themselves as "Democrats" - INCLUDING some RINO "Republicans" choices for that highest of judicial office.
Rather than lifetime TENURE, it would be nice if SCOTUS "justices" faced ANNUAL REVIEW and re election - or NOT - BY "We the People" - which would no doubt take a Constitutional Amendment - which CONGRESS would NEVER allow.
Plus, we would have to argue with Democrats whether to use "one man one vote" or the Electoral College system for voting.