Yes, ALL of the NOAA climate change predictions are based on COMPUTER MODELS and are subject to "GIGO" - "Garbage In Garbage Out".
NEVER forget in was the United Nations apparatchiks ( beginning in 1970) that conjured up the ENTIRE global COOLING, global WARMING, "Man-made"- and then just plain CLIMATE CHANGE that covers all the bases in …
Yes, ALL of the NOAA climate change predictions are based on COMPUTER MODELS and are subject to "GIGO" - "Garbage In Garbage Out".
NEVER forget in was the United Nations apparatchiks ( beginning in 1970) that conjured up the ENTIRE global COOLING, global WARMING, "Man-made"- and then just plain CLIMATE CHANGE that covers all the bases in the UN FRAUD -
which as WRITTEN in their own premise was NEVER about the environment and was POLITICAL from the get-go.
NO doubt that so-called "geo-engineering" has been afoot (globally) - which is by definition man-made, but by GOVERNMENTS....more precisely by the UN and collaborating nations to CREATE panic among ignorant humanity to herd them into the safety of ONE-WORLD Government (and) create a PERPETUAL CARBON TAX on every human being from birth to death (because of their carbon FOOTPRINT -
with some carbon footprints causing more "pollution" than others.
A truly EVIL scam to cause BILLIONS of dollars (or whatever form of money is in vogue) into the UN coffers to fund un-elected parasites.
The reality is, if there was NO carbon dioxide (CO-2), there would be NO animal life on planet earth, and NO OXYGEN, NO plants, grasses, flowers or trees. Earth is a CARBON BASED PLANET - and "We" are carbon based animals who breathe IN air (oxygen and nitrogen) and EXHALE CO-2 from Birth to Death. Further, humans expel 2.14 grahams of CO-2 per hour, 2.3 LB per day and 250 - 350 kilograms per year.
NOTE: to all "depopulation fanatics" you can all help mother earth by eliminating YOURSELVES!
Exactly. Their CO2 lowering plan is a recipe for world wide famine and starvation. For the globalists it seems they see this as more of a feature than a bug.
Ideally we would have more CO2, not less. As CO2 increases, plants will thrive and multiply in number hoovering up the extra CO2 and in turn providing us O2 breathers with more of the O2 we need. Win - win
I like to challenge the tree huggers to name one end of the world prediction since they started making them in the 70s that has come to pass. It's odd that they never seem to have an answer.
But, you know how those leftys tend to be: never in doubt, but rarely correct.
Venus’ surface is 100% rock without the modeling confounds of our oceans.
The surface has 100% cloud cover (thus is not subject to Richard Lindzen of MIT’s “Infared Iris” effects. Again, no Earth-like confounds.
The upper atmosphere zooms at 1000 mph. The modelers don’t Know why and can’t reproduce the Venusian atmospheric conditions.
If they can do simple, I have zero confidence they can do complex…. the Gubmint sure will pay for it.
Oh yeah, regarding volcanic discharges: the 40,000 mile mid-ocean ridges are volcanically active and are churning out stuff continuously- how to measure and model these contributions?
Yes, ALL of the NOAA climate change predictions are based on COMPUTER MODELS and are subject to "GIGO" - "Garbage In Garbage Out".
NEVER forget in was the United Nations apparatchiks ( beginning in 1970) that conjured up the ENTIRE global COOLING, global WARMING, "Man-made"- and then just plain CLIMATE CHANGE that covers all the bases in the UN FRAUD -
which as WRITTEN in their own premise was NEVER about the environment and was POLITICAL from the get-go.
NO doubt that so-called "geo-engineering" has been afoot (globally) - which is by definition man-made, but by GOVERNMENTS....more precisely by the UN and collaborating nations to CREATE panic among ignorant humanity to herd them into the safety of ONE-WORLD Government (and) create a PERPETUAL CARBON TAX on every human being from birth to death (because of their carbon FOOTPRINT -
with some carbon footprints causing more "pollution" than others.
A truly EVIL scam to cause BILLIONS of dollars (or whatever form of money is in vogue) into the UN coffers to fund un-elected parasites.
The reality is, if there was NO carbon dioxide (CO-2), there would be NO animal life on planet earth, and NO OXYGEN, NO plants, grasses, flowers or trees. Earth is a CARBON BASED PLANET - and "We" are carbon based animals who breathe IN air (oxygen and nitrogen) and EXHALE CO-2 from Birth to Death. Further, humans expel 2.14 grahams of CO-2 per hour, 2.3 LB per day and 250 - 350 kilograms per year.
NOTE: to all "depopulation fanatics" you can all help mother earth by eliminating YOURSELVES!
Exactly. Their CO2 lowering plan is a recipe for world wide famine and starvation. For the globalists it seems they see this as more of a feature than a bug.
Ideally we would have more CO2, not less. As CO2 increases, plants will thrive and multiply in number hoovering up the extra CO2 and in turn providing us O2 breathers with more of the O2 we need. Win - win
I like to challenge the tree huggers to name one end of the world prediction since they started making them in the 70s that has come to pass. It's odd that they never seem to have an answer.
But, you know how those leftys tend to be: never in doubt, but rarely correct.
From one 'old guy' to another, the liberal/progressive/Socialist/Communist mind-set is intractable. Hopeless and incurable.
Al Gore said there would not be polar ice by 2013. 🙄🤨
Any retractions on that lie? Nope!
Trouble is every lefty in the countryside immediately pee'd in their diaper and started shoveling money at the "problem".
Al Gore made a relatively large fortune.
TRUTH!!!
Venus’ surface is 100% rock without the modeling confounds of our oceans.
The surface has 100% cloud cover (thus is not subject to Richard Lindzen of MIT’s “Infared Iris” effects. Again, no Earth-like confounds.
The upper atmosphere zooms at 1000 mph. The modelers don’t Know why and can’t reproduce the Venusian atmospheric conditions.
If they can do simple, I have zero confidence they can do complex…. the Gubmint sure will pay for it.
Oh yeah, regarding volcanic discharges: the 40,000 mile mid-ocean ridges are volcanically active and are churning out stuff continuously- how to measure and model these contributions?