The word is concerned, not worried. There is a difference. Excess oxygen was not my point. Concern was not for myself so much as young having benefit of healthy planet. Resilient, won't disagree. Incapable of going wrong....well.
Does humanity want to play Russian roulette with our planet, blithely thinking it will just keep on despite ou…
The word is concerned, not worried. There is a difference. Excess oxygen was not my point. Concern was not for myself so much as young having benefit of healthy planet. Resilient, won't disagree. Incapable of going wrong....well.
Does humanity want to play Russian roulette with our planet, blithely thinking it will just keep on despite our abuse. Planet age 4.5 billion years, humans 300 thousand (give or take), Industrial Age since 1750. We are being ignorant or naive if we think we have had enough time to KNOW what we reap and/or sow.
I'll also repeat...natural causes can also account for climate change. I don't dispute that. Why would a reasoning person discount any/all possibilities. The question is degrees of cause. Which is the greater disrupter. For myself, I'd rather have an honest knowledge base than not. Where that is, I know not.
The word is concerned, not worried. There is a difference. Excess oxygen was not my point. Concern was not for myself so much as young having benefit of healthy planet. Resilient, won't disagree. Incapable of going wrong....well.
Does humanity want to play Russian roulette with our planet, blithely thinking it will just keep on despite our abuse. Planet age 4.5 billion years, humans 300 thousand (give or take), Industrial Age since 1750. We are being ignorant or naive if we think we have had enough time to KNOW what we reap and/or sow.
I'll also repeat...natural causes can also account for climate change. I don't dispute that. Why would a reasoning person discount any/all possibilities. The question is degrees of cause. Which is the greater disrupter. For myself, I'd rather have an honest knowledge base than not. Where that is, I know not.