77 Comments

UN Human Rights Council members include China, Cuba and Sudan.

Any more questions????

Expand full comment

China will agree to this??

Expand full comment

👍

Expand full comment

UN == Useless Notion; noting but a haven for 3rd World despots to get the best Hotels/Restaurants/Taxis in New York City.

Defund IT NOW!

Expand full comment

It would appear we will have this Pact (Treaty) For The Future, shoved down our throats. When I drive around my town and see the third world taking over sections of it, this Pact has already began with no resistance, no impeachments, no sentencing. We cannot count on anyone but we the people to fix this problem. It seems most all of the powers that be, from their secured protected towers, will unleash the havoc onto us and we will have to fight or live with it. The pope is calling for open borders throughout the world while he sits inside of his 40 foot walled fortress with armed guards. Suicide is a mortal sin, so are we supposed to allow marauders to enter our communities pillage rape murder and destroy our country. Are we supposed to allow our young to be poisoned by Chinese fentanyl? Do you know illegal aliens cannot enter the Vatican, of course they can’t. Why doesn’t the pope allow a million illegals into his community? No he tells Italy which is being destroyed to keep its borders open. The worlds leaders are corrupt evil hungry for power and riches. Eventually we the people will have to convene our own summit of the guillotine. J.Goodrich

Expand full comment

As Dr. M. pointed out, we have a 10th amendment to fall back on. And finally am seeing signs I have hoped for of states simply ignoring fed dictates that are obviously not kosher. Let state AGs stand on their hind legs and inform the states when not to accept illegal orders from d.c.and tell the fed to pound sand

Expand full comment

We can and maybe some are but this third world flow of illegals is not slowing down. Africa is being decimated by their young and others leaving for Europe to receive everything for free. The consequences of these leftists are killing the third world as well. It’s beyond imagination the destruction these leftist elites are creating.

Expand full comment

And the leftists, whether one wants to believe or not, are doing the destruction on purpose 🤬

Expand full comment

But they are getting richer

Expand full comment

That may change with mass deportation and the elimination of funding to illegals. Call me naive (and also possibly stupid) but if the President with the support of congress and the people simply tears up their feckless agreement and says “GFY” what exactly can they do about it. Step 1: remove all USA taxpayer funding to any and all organizations associated with these yahoos. Step 2: states enact laws like Tennessee did that prohibits anything the WHO says having any effect on them.

Expand full comment

Nice to know at least one state (that I’m aware of now), that enacted laws to let the UN know TN stands against this BS from the UN!

Expand full comment

Having the 10th Ammendment to fall back on is the equivalent of saying we “have the Supreme Court to fall back on”. We know that the SCOTUS cannot be counted on to nullify executive orders, having reversed only a handful since World War 2. These UN agreements would seem to be an obvious violation of US sovereignty, but so is binding the US to Agenda 2030 and the 17 Sustainable Development goals without Senate approval. I give the current court 50/50 odds to reverse parts of the agreements outlined above and zero odds at 100% rejection.

Expand full comment

Can only wait and see. In my view the 10th supercedes even SCOTUS. If not, why is it even there?

Expand full comment

You just fingered the problem. Our judiciary interprets the Constitution as well as new law and historical case law any way they want. SCOTUS is the Constitution. The document is just words on parchment paper. What matters is what is in the hearts and minds of those charged with implementing and enforcing the Constitution. As a Law professor I had in college told our class: “The law is what the judges say it is”. That includes the Constitution. Full stop.

Expand full comment

The 10th Amendment has been virtually totally ignored for decades.

Expand full comment

I agree with you Brian, we are run by a bunch of lazy cowards and remember they and their families are all pampered with money and benefits even their burial is in a way paid for by us!!!! So it’s like having the criminal determine the punishment for his own crime. How did we ever get here??

Expand full comment

Unregulated immigration played a big role

Expand full comment

😱

Expand full comment

Why do people want global governance? Local municipalities can’t even agree, let alone at the state and federal level. How many times have you seen the headlines in local newspapers about local corruption in government? How many more examples do we need that human nature is self-serving, always, so limited government is the only way out of this mess?

A Republic…if we can keep it. It’s time to admit that America is a failed state. The "Anti-Federalists" - who gave us our cherished Bill of Rights - warned us repeatedly and we failed to heed their warnings that creating a central government would create the big, corrupt government we know today. They were right!

https://lizlasorte.substack.com/p/a-modest-proposal-part-iii-what-were?r=76q58

Expand full comment

People do not want it....just those who can profit from it do. Lawyer for f.d.a. admits that the agency overstepped its authority in wuflu guidance. Why? Does the fact that every recommendation they made cost an arm and a leg and that many who recommended also were financially benefited explain?

Expand full comment

I have been pondering the changes I have seen in medicine since my college days in the 60s. The premed students I knew were largely driven by a sincere desire to be good physicians and all that entails. Then along came medicare and really big money opportunity. And then I heard about how some premed students cheated on lab practical exams, bettering their grades and handicapping the competition for entry into the "good" med schools. Is this what you want treating you and yours?. Med schools once graded on aptitude and attitude and weeded this type out but no more. As we have seen recently, the Hippocratic Oath is no longer the prime directive for far too many. Greed corrupts and the healing arts have lost their innocence..

Expand full comment

It's sad we've allowed ourselves to get to this place where First Do No Harm means nothing anymore.

https://lizlasorte.substack.com/p/first-do-no-harm?r=76q58

Expand full comment

Amen!

Expand full comment

Right on Dr Nash, and possibly worse yet, my GP is nothing more than a clerk (albeit one with a lengthy education) for the insurance company and his ONLY tools are medicines Pharmaceuticals tell insurance to use. Oh, he can refer to specialists (good luck with that), and there is always surgery (whether you really need it or not so beware). But for all intents and purposes the medical field is as hollowed out as the middle class. Destitute and at a dead end if health is what you are seeking.

Expand full comment

Why do people want global governance? The would be rulers for power, plunder and riches? The would be subjects/slaves for survival, toleration, protection?

Expand full comment

Politicians been bought.

Expand full comment

Because they're useless, weak and stupid for the most part. N'est-ce pas?

Expand full comment

I don't think 'people' want global governance, but the world bankers, corporations who will benefit financially, and those in power who want more do.

Expand full comment

Liz - Yes indeed. "Why do you want global governance?" (Followed by: "Why do you want to give up our Constitution/Bill of Rights?") Those are THE questions to ask any/everyone who supports, or allows, this wolf in sheep's clothing to be ratified.

Expand full comment

There will be no agreement between n any level… all decisions imposed… we have no say whatever

Expand full comment

SPOT-ON Liz!

Expand full comment

👍

Expand full comment

Thank you for this timely forewarning! I personally can't resign myself to going down without a fight. The UN with its Agenda 2030 and Sri Lanka, as well as the WHO with its execution of the covid affair have demonstrated their gross levels of incompetance.

So, is Biden suffiently competent to commit our USA to such agreements? Can his competency be attacked? Should he be proven to have insuffient competance, is a Vice President able to act in his stead? Can such questions drag out an authority to agree? Time is of an essence. Can these issues be played through to the election? Should Trump prevail can further issues arise as to who should make the decision of our participation?

Can this matter be developed into a relevant issue to be considered in terms of who to elect?

I seem to recall we have a small contingent in the Congress who are aware. Can they be enlisted to sound the alarm and formulate strategies?

I strenuously object to my/us/our many Nations being stepped on.

I agree it is wise to prepare for the worst and hughly appreciate your assistance in that regard. However, I also think any of us with viable connections should be doing any and all we can to generate general knowledge and oppositions.

❤️ ❤️ ❤️

Expand full comment

Jean, Right! All excellent points/questions you pose. (The question of Biden's competence is especially basic.) This is a head's up for all attorneys. The Highwire's persistent and successful attorney would be perfect to tackle this global takeover. Treason is illegal...

Expand full comment

7Hope he will learn of this and share it up with others who may be able to flesh out strategies to implement. Further, this is 'news,' IMO it would also be useful for our citizenry to know about.

Expand full comment

If you've never prayed before, pray now. God help us all.

Expand full comment

A new video interview between Tucker Carlson and Mike Benz posted yesterday on TCN, but I've only listened through to about the 50-ish minute mark. So far it's an exposé of the US Deep State's international bullying and hypocrisies, manifest around the world. It's hard to hear such ugliness ascribed to my country's government, but at this point I should be past the point of surprise.

What I find confusing is that Benz paints a picture of a Deep State that twists arms everywhere in the world to force compliance with US interests. In contrast, I see the recent WHO treaties and this "Pact for the Future," (etc.) as moves to deliberately subordinate US interests to internationalist ones. My hunch is that through it all, China will land on their feet. Perhaps we're seeing an accumulation of power for the purposes of handoff.

Maybe I'll gain clarification upon finishing my viewing of the 2-hour video.

Expand full comment

Benz' view is more aligned with what I hear from non-US citizens in Europe.

Expand full comment

Spot on Dr. Malone. My parents immigrated to Canada from the former Yugoslavia, I have visited many times it truly is a beautiful country, but has been divided for many years now, thanks to NATO America being the leader. I will say that mentioning America gets one not only dirty looks but the nasty, nasty words that follow. It is the government, politicians, however most loathe all people that reside there, which is not fair imho. My last visit a number of years back I went with a friend, she has never been but wanted to see where her parents came from. We spent some time in Dubrovnik and spoke English between us, well the first thing we heard from a group that overheard us was, Amerikanke fuj, (yuk) followed by swearing. We both turned and said Canadian, a better reception, as soon as they hear English they assume USA. So many tourists from other countries were there, that we met but the americans are despised, very scary. It is so sad to see and hear. Truly I don't blame them, as I saw the aftermath of the bombings in Serbia, a few years after it happened. God Bless us all.

Expand full comment

Which was heavily suggested in Le Carre's later spy novels

Expand full comment

Appearances/perceptions are at play to give the impression of two things at odds with one another. This is not the case. The PTB used their patsy Wilson to force the continuance of WWI; his 14 points reframed nation-states in Europe and Asia and his League of Nations was adopted by the PTB (just not the US). NYC bankers funded the concurrent Bolshevik revolution while France and Britain’s Sykes Picot Agreement divided the Ottoman Empire and Russia and Italy managed to gain territory also. US Bankers funded a collapsed Germany which brought WWII and FDR’s admin played Japan to instigate its retaliation. FDR had a major hand in another reframing of nation-states. Forming the UN was the purpose behind both wars which were funded on all side by the same people. Except for Russia, the former Empires still exist today with their power intact.

Washington D.C. is an instrument of the UN as is NATO. The Korean war was the first ‘known’ UN created war. All following skirmishes, insurrections, installations and/or toppling of heads of State are done in this same vein. Russia has been played for over a century; China joined the UN early on and is used for many reasons, top two - to secure natural resources and rare minerals in Africa and South America, and consolidate all of South Asia.

Continent domination is the UN goal. It was Bush 43 that clumsily tried to united Mexico, the US and Canada. Who ends up with the middle east is anyone’s guess. In the end, whenever that is, the Zionist (PTB) will reign supreme for they are the UN.

Expand full comment

Probably just coincidence that - Alger Hiss - a U.S. State department employee (later convicted Soviet spy and card carrying Communist ), ginned up the United Nations Charter at the behest FDR - during WWII - and accompanied FDR to "Summit" meetings with Stalin and Churchill - and when WWII ended, became the 1st Secretary the fledgling United Nations and presided over the very 1st UN meeting in San Francisco.

Expand full comment

To understand the driving force behind this requires an understanding that there is indeed a battle between good and evil. Between God and Satan.

Satan seeks power and control in order to kill as many people as possible and take their souls with him to his eternal destiny in hell.

Human nature after the fall in the garden of Eden is also evil and naturally aligns with Satan. The only escape is the gospel of Jesus Christ which restores our relationship with God and gives us a restored nature.

The founders of this nation understood this and built the nation upon principles of truth and justice found in the Bible. Everything in the constitution is there to protect us from human nature and Satan.

The story of this nation is much like the story of Adam and Eve. The nation is failing due to having turned away from God. The founders also knew their constitution would be useless should this happen.

Many now see the Bible as a fairy tale. This is spiritual blindness. We wonder how anyone could support things that so clearly will enslave them. This is spiritual blindness plain and simple.

We are in an existential battle between truth and lies. Our only hope is spiritual renewal.

The globalists will eventually prevail. You can see it coming as sure as the rising and falling of the sun. Darkness is upon us.

Should we fight it? Yes! Always! Resist the Satanic agenda. Agenda 2030 is its latest sinister incarnation. Can you not see the brilliance of it? It’s intricacies, the psyops, the planning come from the mind of Satan.

But understand that what matters is the destiny of our souls. Heaven is our eternal inheritance. The battle has already been won.

Teach this to your children and anyone whose ears have been opened by God to hear the truth.

Be at peace. Live joyfully. Listen for God’s direction. He leads His sheep. Get out the popcorn and watch prophecy being fulfilled. It’s an amazing show with a glorious ending.

Expand full comment

It’s very very interesting if you just read or listen to what they are saying you would think that this is wonderful. But reading between the lines or small print. is crystal clear what they ( all the global elites) more wealth & power. The UN is just an address they hide behind. It’s for the greater good. B… S…!

Expand full comment

We will see what happens next Administration. I am concerned about the Black Swan event that will drive this agenda over the top

Expand full comment

valid concern

Expand full comment

"Because we certainly cannot rely on the US Senate to do anything to protect the sovereignty and autonomy of the United States and its Constitutional Republic."

That is the depressing reality. And for the same reason, we can't expect the globalist RINO's to give a squat if the Democrats cheat in the up-coming election to an obnoxiously shameless degree. Oh yeah, they'll do their mealy-mouthed responses, just like last time. But that's it, just as they have done regarding all the law-fare, etc. But no real passionate indignation proportional to the level of depravity in our legal system. And that means you'll hear from the same few, on the same alt-media outlets, broadcasting to the same choir, with the same lack of effectiveness.

They've got this. Because all it takes TO have it is to have a majority of the electorate sufficiently ignorant of what's coming.

Expand full comment

The rinos are being removed..at least in Texas. They have escaped identification and resulting expulsion for far too long but I am sensing a worm turn here and hopefully elsewhere

Expand full comment

I totally agree with you that State nullification and/or secession is the only hope. Praying for it!

Expand full comment

When Trump was elected in 2016 he threatened to de-fund the UN and force it off American soil. I hope he understands that this time he has to follow through immediately or they will scuttle every move he tries to make to clean up the swamp.

Expand full comment

I believe that this may qualify as Treason in 'aiding the enemy' rather than protecting its citizens.

As for international law, it "defines the legal responsibilities of the States in their conduct with each other, and their treatment of individuals within State boundaries". As I read this, it supports laws/treaties that protect citizens and limits threats to citizens in other States (countries). So a sane person would read that as new protection of citizens rights and preventing for example, the US from attacking another country (like Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Ukraine, Russia, etc). It is up to us to make sure words aren't twisted to have the opposite effect and have virtues become vices. As Mattias Desmet explains:

" the institutionalization of a virtue usually deteriorates into the vice that is precisely opposed to the original virtue. According to that psychological mechanism—which I won’t elaborate on here—the police become a threat to the safety of the people (see, for example, the police response during COVID protests and what happens in ‘police states’), the church a threat to morality (perversion and child abuse thrived within institutionalized religion), medicine detrimental to health (a huge percentage of diseases are ‘iatrogenic’) and the university becomes the main producer of misinformation (see replication crisis)."

https://words.mattiasdesmet.org/p/trump-kennedy-and-the-true-nature

Expand full comment

Watching that short video alone reminds me of watching similar content when I was forced to attend government schools. It's crazy that it gave off a motivating and positive vibe when sitting in a classroom and viewing such a video.

Fast-forward to today, after conducting and still conducting research on what the true motives behind those videos are - central planning, socialism, and forced international cooperation - and watching similar videos similar to what's shown above, and just how I get that sick feeling in my stomach that a summit that involves "tackling" these issues will lead to nothing but a dystopian future.

To that kid sitting in a government classroom today and feeling the same excitement and motivation I felt once upon a time - between 1996 and 2009 - conduct some research on the alternative and thus, suppressed, ridiculed, and censored side of the debate. Trust me, you'll be glad you did, and you'll also be grateful you freed yourself from the chains of indoctrination that the state likes to force onto all of us.

Expand full comment

Good information but what can be done about this if our Congress is powerless to stop it? Something just doesn't seem right that one man, the President, could single handedly turn over our rights to another governing entity like UN by EO! I wouldn't want this to happen no matter which party were in office and Congress should be alarmed (if they're awake and paying attention) that their job to represent their constituents is being upended!

Expand full comment

The Government of the U.S.A currently has far more challenges that it's citizens can handle. People from the entire planet who, regardless of circumstances, are unable to survive or thrive in their native environments flock to the U.S.A. where they are provided free sustenance, housing and health care on the backs of U.S.A. legal citizens. All this is allowed and provided in exchange for illegal votes and to a lesser extent for cheap labor. I say look within before we go about managing the rest of the world. There is an abundance of poverty, homelessness and unfairness on our soil to address without importing more. Hypocrisy is pointing to the mess in your neighbor's yard when your own is unclean. I see the words World and United as a global "brother could you spare a dollar", ( it's really a dime, but adjusted for inflation ). 34 trillion in debt and we are going to fund feel good World and United organizations.

Expand full comment

I saw a really good discussions of the merits and demerits of immigration on a YouTube video several years ago. The speaker showed conclusively that, no matter how sympathetic we are to the suffering of immigrants around the world, not even taking 10 million a year will put a dent in that suffering nor change the root problem. Far far better to limit immigration here to those who come fully committed to our Constitution and fully skilled to contribute to our society and spend some of our money and resources helping poorer people WHERE they were born. If we can lift a whole country thru clean water, better education, the keys to better governance, then they don’t need to escape from there and they in turn can help others.

Expand full comment