I've been curious about Yeadon for weeks now. His story has fallen to the side because the "variants" story is now accepted by all sides, pro and con. But his point in the beginning was that covid mutations are better termed "sameiants". I've still to this day (9 months after first hearing his comments) heard nothing from the other va…
I've been curious about Yeadon for weeks now. His story has fallen to the side because the "variants" story is now accepted by all sides, pro and con. But his point in the beginning was that covid mutations are better termed "sameiants". I've still to this day (9 months after first hearing his comments) heard nothing from the other vaccine critics (like Malone) about how their perspective and Yeadon's can be reconciled. Does anyone know more on this?
I've been curious about Yeadon for weeks now. His story has fallen to the side because the "variants" story is now accepted by all sides, pro and con. But his point in the beginning was that covid mutations are better termed "sameiants". I've still to this day (9 months after first hearing his comments) heard nothing from the other vaccine critics (like Malone) about how their perspective and Yeadon's can be reconciled. Does anyone know more on this?