A question also becomes, why has Dr. McCullough signed on to be part of this? He was hunted, lost so much that he worked for… what connection does McCullough have with other members of The Wellness Company board like Dr. Harvey Risch? What does this mean? Lots of rabbit holes to go down, but I don’t have the energy for it all. There are …
A question also becomes, why has Dr. McCullough signed on to be part of this? He was hunted, lost so much that he worked for… what connection does McCullough have with other members of The Wellness Company board like Dr. Harvey Risch? What does this mean? Lots of rabbit holes to go down, but I don’t have the energy for it all. There are serious geo-poltical games going on in the world, how do they align? I don’t have the bandwidth anymore to go into the micro… I tend to look at the macro. 'What it IS is what it DOES.’
Yeah, afraid I do. Or simply proving that physicians on the whole, well, rarely make good science. Understand he his a working physician seeing patients and a specialty to keep current in. That is full time work. So an element of dilettantism is to be expected. This in an unlikely assortment of authors submitting a paper the subject of which none are authorities to a rather unlikely journal. Doe.s not pass the nose test.
A question also becomes, why has Dr. McCullough signed on to be part of this? He was hunted, lost so much that he worked for… what connection does McCullough have with other members of The Wellness Company board like Dr. Harvey Risch? What does this mean? Lots of rabbit holes to go down, but I don’t have the energy for it all. There are serious geo-poltical games going on in the world, how do they align? I don’t have the bandwidth anymore to go into the micro… I tend to look at the macro. 'What it IS is what it DOES.’
Fame (notoriety) corrupts?
Or a need to have a means of income.
Which is guaranteed by those 2 letters. Does not need to cheat.
Yes… but he and others were hunted down for making waves.
Do you really think he's cheating?
Yeah, afraid I do. Or simply proving that physicians on the whole, well, rarely make good science. Understand he his a working physician seeing patients and a specialty to keep current in. That is full time work. So an element of dilettantism is to be expected. This in an unlikely assortment of authors submitting a paper the subject of which none are authorities to a rather unlikely journal. Doe.s not pass the nose test.
I hear your concerns, but it doesn't appear that you have actually studied the statistics of the McCullough paper, as Dr. Malone suggested.
I am not questioning Dr. Malone… I am wondering what is going on in the bigger picture.
I hear you.