As someone who has been around the block a few times this smells a lot like someone with a grudge/ message to tell who journal shopped for a willing accomplice. The authorship informs the grunt work was by a newly minted MPH (which right there is a red flag) which was mentored by a senior author with little to no creds in this area of research.
I haven’t been around the block in the science and medicine world except for my 27 year struggle with autoimmune issues. I respect those who place the physical and mental wellbeing of the individual (and the public at large) at the top… not to get rich and not for political purposes. I understand that we have been propagandized, intentionally, for a very long time. It has been an opiate to keep us compliant rather than respected. If you love your fellow countrymen you tell them the truth and you work through the issues together… if you want to rule them and grow powerful and wealthy in the process, you lie to them. The problem now is we no longer know whom to trust… that in itself is a *win* for some who really don't care about others. There are leashes being used, who is attached to which end is the open question.
This particular publication was peer-reviewed. That means others in the field approved it for publication. I have read though a few other Hulscher publications, (the new kid) and they seem fine. As a Patent Attorney in the sciences, I have read many, many scientific publications. I know how to do that and I know what to check for. This paper is professionally
done. Hulscher has likely published many before in his career before he received his MPH (Masters in Public Health.) Why is Dr. Malone writing what he's writing? I'm not sure, so I should probably not guess or surmise.
Peer reviewed means not one damn thing today un!ess you can convince anyone that viral geneticists regularly peer review fish and game papers. Peer review today often means selected editors sending manuscripts to selected reviewers. I doubt many who cited that paper ever heard of it until it was broached by the authors in more mainstream venues. And as for a MPH it is in my experience largely held by physicians as leg up in administration with little more required of them than a course in statistics. It does not usually come with a heavy dose of science but rather more in public health admin.
Exactly, but McCulloch does this why?? A silly sort of notoriety? Money? Given what has been done, it seems a doctor with his alleged creds would naturally rise above such things - becoming a voice in our wilderness, not a shill.
Like I said to you on X, M. Yeadon was making similar statements and you challenged him and the response was nasty. These assertions must make you want to scream after all the research and education you have provided in a scientific manner and then to be questioned about your accuracy!
The problem with people making unsupported claims like this is that it delegitimizes the whole issue. The boy who cried wolf.
As someone who has been around the block a few times this smells a lot like someone with a grudge/ message to tell who journal shopped for a willing accomplice. The authorship informs the grunt work was by a newly minted MPH (which right there is a red flag) which was mentored by a senior author with little to no creds in this area of research.
I haven’t been around the block in the science and medicine world except for my 27 year struggle with autoimmune issues. I respect those who place the physical and mental wellbeing of the individual (and the public at large) at the top… not to get rich and not for political purposes. I understand that we have been propagandized, intentionally, for a very long time. It has been an opiate to keep us compliant rather than respected. If you love your fellow countrymen you tell them the truth and you work through the issues together… if you want to rule them and grow powerful and wealthy in the process, you lie to them. The problem now is we no longer know whom to trust… that in itself is a *win* for some who really don't care about others. There are leashes being used, who is attached to which end is the open question.
Dr. Seignalet put all autoimmune diseases into remission with diet,
www.seignalet-plus.com
Also, search for your "issue" + vitamin d deficiency + pubmed
…and yeah, war is hell and a dirty game.
And we the "readers" are in the massive learning curves of America life.
This is an awesome moment in history to be alive!
Welcome to The New Frontier!
"I've got a good feeing about this"! A coming alive..... in 2025!
What ‘new frontier’ would this be?
The one we wake to every single day.
A What's new about the possibility of WW3?
Even more so closer to home....
A What's new in my neighborhood?
The Biden's made a human migratory mess to clean up as a big thing.
There's a new frontier to deal with right there.
And we are in it!
And what about the prospects of further war and suffering for people across the globe and possibly here excites you?
That's it's our turn to dam well make this kind of political behavior is null and void, as in starting today.
Our voices must be heard.
What's the greatest problem facing the next generation?
Malinformations and debts.
To a .Gov that has no integrity, only hubris.
New kid on block swings at inside fastballs?
This particular publication was peer-reviewed. That means others in the field approved it for publication. I have read though a few other Hulscher publications, (the new kid) and they seem fine. As a Patent Attorney in the sciences, I have read many, many scientific publications. I know how to do that and I know what to check for. This paper is professionally
done. Hulscher has likely published many before in his career before he received his MPH (Masters in Public Health.) Why is Dr. Malone writing what he's writing? I'm not sure, so I should probably not guess or surmise.
Peer reviewed means not one damn thing today un!ess you can convince anyone that viral geneticists regularly peer review fish and game papers. Peer review today often means selected editors sending manuscripts to selected reviewers. I doubt many who cited that paper ever heard of it until it was broached by the authors in more mainstream venues. And as for a MPH it is in my experience largely held by physicians as leg up in administration with little more required of them than a course in statistics. It does not usually come with a heavy dose of science but rather more in public health admin.
Well lets just begin this by saying East meets West...North Meets South...
That sets up a Storm we know so little about. This is an intell cyclone.
This was bound to happen, was it not? The science is being Challenged!
We are not the referee's in this game of skilled knowledge. OnlyObservers.
No creds has become a sort of legitimate niche?
Exactly, but McCulloch does this why?? A silly sort of notoriety? Money? Given what has been done, it seems a doctor with his alleged creds would naturally rise above such things - becoming a voice in our wilderness, not a shill.
I will say “Notoriety & Money”…!
Like I said to you on X, M. Yeadon was making similar statements and you challenged him and the response was nasty. These assertions must make you want to scream after all the research and education you have provided in a scientific manner and then to be questioned about your accuracy!
Didn’t say it to me - Strzok kicked me off Twitter and never let me back on. What a lizard-being.
Fall migratory routes across N. Alaska and west and mid central Canada flyway systems.
https://www.ducks.org/conservation/where-ducks-unlimited-works/western-alaska-aleutian-bering-sea-islands
https://www.stateofthebirds.org/2016/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/garcia-NOPI-720x615.jpg
These feathered birds carry more than just a few invasive things in migrations.