Yes, I'm afraid Bianca's link goes to his post where his lawyer told him not to share it, but I have the earlier post still in my inbox. It's part of the multi-million dollar suit filed against Calvary Church for continuing to hold services and not enforcing the County's mask mandate. From his former headline: "Santa Clara County's public health officer, Sara Cody, just admitted under oath... that she doesn't know the size of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and that she relied on the flawed Bangladesh study as the basis for her masking mandate."
The Bangladesh study showed a difference of two cases in a population of 100,000. Purple (cloth) masks are shown to have no effect and it shows a graph with the curves for seropositivity superimposed on each other for the control (no mask) and purple mask. There's some effect for the surgical mask but the red mask does better! Go figure, pretty-red, old guy!
I'll post the links he puts in the article on the Bangladesh study below:
Respectfully I submit that crawling through the weeds trying to defeat tyrannical mandates is folly.
The position I believe should be taken is that these governmental entities have no constitutional authority to "mandate" mask wearing, shot taking or anything else for that matter.
Similarly, those seeking religious exemptions to avoid the poison prick are by their action accepting the premise that the State has the authority in the first place to dictate administration of a medication. They don't!
Tereza, can you share it?
Yes, I'm afraid Bianca's link goes to his post where his lawyer told him not to share it, but I have the earlier post still in my inbox. It's part of the multi-million dollar suit filed against Calvary Church for continuing to hold services and not enforcing the County's mask mandate. From his former headline: "Santa Clara County's public health officer, Sara Cody, just admitted under oath... that she doesn't know the size of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and that she relied on the flawed Bangladesh study as the basis for her masking mandate."
The Bangladesh study showed a difference of two cases in a population of 100,000. Purple (cloth) masks are shown to have no effect and it shows a graph with the curves for seropositivity superimposed on each other for the control (no mask) and purple mask. There's some effect for the surgical mask but the red mask does better! Go figure, pretty-red, old guy!
I'll post the links he puts in the article on the Bangladesh study below:
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/masks-fail-their-latest-test
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/ubs-debates-what-did-the-massive
https://rumble.com/v11453u-interview-with-mike-deskevich-on-the-bangladesh-mask-study
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360320982_The_Bangladesh_Mask_study_a_Bayesian_perspective
Respectfully I submit that crawling through the weeds trying to defeat tyrannical mandates is folly.
The position I believe should be taken is that these governmental entities have no constitutional authority to "mandate" mask wearing, shot taking or anything else for that matter.
Similarly, those seeking religious exemptions to avoid the poison prick are by their action accepting the premise that the State has the authority in the first place to dictate administration of a medication. They don't!
Doctors prescribe, individuals decide.
Thank you! : )
This is the link: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/santa-clara-countys-public-health