That is sad, because so many of us unvaccinated are really concerned about shedding! But would the data be suppressed if it showed a truth to shedding? Sigh! Another good column, Dr. Malone!
Pfizer included information on shedding in their original filing for approval for their vaccine. Something about if a female co-located with a test subject is having issues with her cycle during the course of the trial to please report it. I had several female clients in the first year of vaccine distribution who refused it and absolutely had issues with shedding affecting their menstrual cycles quite drastically! But they've both been doing good cleansing protocols and are doing well now.
The clinical trial protocol document linked below is evidence that Pfizer *anticipated* that people coming into contact with the study participants (the ones receiving the Pfizer "vaccines") either via тАЬinhalation or skin contactтАЭ might exhibit SAEs (serious adverse events) or AEs (adverse events). And that is *exactly* what happened, with thousands of women around the world (who did NOT take the "vaccine") reporting adverse effects with their menstrual cycles (severe bleeding, clotting, cramps, miscarriages, starting bleeding again after many years of no periods due to menopause, etc.) from coming into contact with those who received the mRNA "vaccine".
Save this to your hard drive, and read section 10.4.1, (pages 132 to 133), where it states, and I quote: "Male participants are eligible to participate [in the study, where they would receive the Pfizer Covid "vaccines"] if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention [the "vaccines"], which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk of the study intervention(s)." Read that part and what follows, as men receiving the jabs are then told to REFRAIN from having sex with a "female of childbearing potential." Got that?!
How many men taking the Covid jab have been warned not to have sex "for at least 28 days" after their 2nd Covid jab? According to this Pfizer document, anyone not knowing about that warning has potential to cause "reproductive safety riskтАЭ.
Also be sure to read sections 8.3.5.1 to 8.3.5.3 (pages 67 to 69) -- Pfizer anticipated what is now being referred to as "shedding" of the vaccine contents from the vaxxed to the unvaxxed. How can anyone pushing this dangerous jab claim that the public had "informed consent"? The public were not informed of this reproductive risk.
No disrespect to you Dr. Malone, I call govna on no funding. How about taking just a bit from Ukraine and funding the people here. No, the evil politicians in Ukraine and their ilk need funding for more homes all around the globe. Damn, all liars need to be tarred and feathered.
as do I. But no funding = no data.
That is sad, because so many of us unvaccinated are really concerned about shedding! But would the data be suppressed if it showed a truth to shedding? Sigh! Another good column, Dr. Malone!
Pfizer included information on shedding in their original filing for approval for their vaccine. Something about if a female co-located with a test subject is having issues with her cycle during the course of the trial to please report it. I had several female clients in the first year of vaccine distribution who refused it and absolutely had issues with shedding affecting their menstrual cycles quite drastically! But they've both been doing good cleansing protocols and are doing well now.
The clinical trial protocol document linked below is evidence that Pfizer *anticipated* that people coming into contact with the study participants (the ones receiving the Pfizer "vaccines") either via тАЬinhalation or skin contactтАЭ might exhibit SAEs (serious adverse events) or AEs (adverse events). And that is *exactly* what happened, with thousands of women around the world (who did NOT take the "vaccine") reporting adverse effects with their menstrual cycles (severe bleeding, clotting, cramps, miscarriages, starting bleeding again after many years of no periods due to menopause, etc.) from coming into contact with those who received the mRNA "vaccine".
Save this to your hard drive, and read section 10.4.1, (pages 132 to 133), where it states, and I quote: "Male participants are eligible to participate [in the study, where they would receive the Pfizer Covid "vaccines"] if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention [the "vaccines"], which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk of the study intervention(s)." Read that part and what follows, as men receiving the jabs are then told to REFRAIN from having sex with a "female of childbearing potential." Got that?!
How many men taking the Covid jab have been warned not to have sex "for at least 28 days" after their 2nd Covid jab? According to this Pfizer document, anyone not knowing about that warning has potential to cause "reproductive safety riskтАЭ.
Also be sure to read sections 8.3.5.1 to 8.3.5.3 (pages 67 to 69) -- Pfizer anticipated what is now being referred to as "shedding" of the vaccine contents from the vaxxed to the unvaxxed. How can anyone pushing this dangerous jab claim that the public had "informed consent"? The public were not informed of this reproductive risk.
https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf
No disrespect to you Dr. Malone, I call govna on no funding. How about taking just a bit from Ukraine and funding the people here. No, the evil politicians in Ukraine and their ilk need funding for more homes all around the globe. Damn, all liars need to be tarred and feathered.