Mike, it just struck me as funny when you said that SCOTUS must render, " at least here" (paraphrase) ... and, in my feeble mind, thinking you'd inferred its jurisdiction extended beyond the 50 states.
Mike, it just struck me as funny when you said that SCOTUS must render, " at least here" (paraphrase) ... and, in my feeble mind, thinking you'd inferred its jurisdiction extended beyond the 50 states.
Did I say render? Maybe I got "autocorrected." I'll have to go check, but no I only meant here. Personally, our constitution is the ONLY thing "holding the line" right now. Not even that anyone is defending or upholding it, just that it exists.
If it didn't, we'd be like AU right now. Sure, some would take up arms and fight, but that would be quelled quickly.
Just look at the J6 defendants. We need immediate, and VERY dramatic legal response to that...and so many other things.
Mike, it just struck me as funny when you said that SCOTUS must render, " at least here" (paraphrase) ... and, in my feeble mind, thinking you'd inferred its jurisdiction extended beyond the 50 states.
That said, I think your points are valid.
Did I say render? Maybe I got "autocorrected." I'll have to go check, but no I only meant here. Personally, our constitution is the ONLY thing "holding the line" right now. Not even that anyone is defending or upholding it, just that it exists.
If it didn't, we'd be like AU right now. Sure, some would take up arms and fight, but that would be quelled quickly.
Just look at the J6 defendants. We need immediate, and VERY dramatic legal response to that...and so many other things.