You are good at putting a path of words together between premise and final “point” but independent points may intervene that must be bypassed or addressed directly and “immersion” in criticism at those points is always a risk.
Reminds me of crossing a bog in moonlight a la “Hound of the Baskervilles”. But you got there, Sherlock.
You are good at putting a path of words together between premise and final “point” but independent points may intervene that must be bypassed or addressed directly and “immersion” in criticism at those points is always a risk.
Reminds me of crossing a bog in moonlight a la “Hound of the Baskervilles”. But you got there, Sherlock.
You are good at putting a path of words together between premise and final “point” but independent points may intervene that must be bypassed or addressed directly and “immersion” in criticism at those points is always a risk.
Reminds me of crossing a bog in moonlight a la “Hound of the Baskervilles”. But you got there, Sherlock.