Thanks for documenting this particular piece of insanity. Fascinating that these folks believe they can operate outside of the sovereign structures that are in place which can only be interrupted by way of legitimate action by the sovereign governing bodies. To my knowledge neither the UN or the WEF has a standing army capable of forcing…
Thanks for documenting this particular piece of insanity. Fascinating that these folks believe they can operate outside of the sovereign structures that are in place which can only be interrupted by way of legitimate action by the sovereign governing bodies. To my knowledge neither the UN or the WEF has a standing army capable of forcing their desires on us.
We know that it is possible for the Executive in our US system to take unlawful and unconstitutional actions thanks to the Biden/Harris and previous administrations. We know that there is much unconstitutional governance in place today. But collectively these unlawful actions remain unconstitutional and are subject to reversal or nullification; we've seen corrections recently with Roe vs. Wade and the Chevron Defense Supreme Court rulings. Lincoln may have stopped a particular succession but he most certainly did not eliminate future potential should appropriate circumstances arise.
As a people we need to maintain an absolutist posture as related to our Constitution. It is our governing document and it is our best protection against tyranny. No Executive, No Congress, No Court can change it unless they follow precisely the mechanisms provided in the Constitution itself-- adoption (2/3rds of Congress) and ratification of 38 States or Constitutional Convention. I would argue this nonsensical UN/WEF pact relates not to foreign policy but is deeply intrusive into our domestic well being and harmony and for this reason would require many amendments of our Constitution for Executive or Congress to action it in our Domestic affairs.
We have been loose to say the least in demanding this adherence which is one of the reasons we are now being choked by a giant hostile federal government. We have 50 States that agreed to the Constitution and each has every right to rescind its consent if the federal government should attempt to rescind our Constitution, which I think is very unlikely.
The more people who are demanding adherence to the Constitution on the part of our federal government, politicians, bureaucrats, executives, judges, soldiers and et. al. the more unlikely it would be. We should also engage in repairing the harm that has been done by continuing to reverse the unconstitutional actions already taken by the federal government. This will become easier as the reality of our nations collapsing finances bites deeper and deeper into our society.
Thanks for documenting this particular piece of insanity. Fascinating that these folks believe they can operate outside of the sovereign structures that are in place which can only be interrupted by way of legitimate action by the sovereign governing bodies. To my knowledge neither the UN or the WEF has a standing army capable of forcing their desires on us.
We know that it is possible for the Executive in our US system to take unlawful and unconstitutional actions thanks to the Biden/Harris and previous administrations. We know that there is much unconstitutional governance in place today. But collectively these unlawful actions remain unconstitutional and are subject to reversal or nullification; we've seen corrections recently with Roe vs. Wade and the Chevron Defense Supreme Court rulings. Lincoln may have stopped a particular succession but he most certainly did not eliminate future potential should appropriate circumstances arise.
As a people we need to maintain an absolutist posture as related to our Constitution. It is our governing document and it is our best protection against tyranny. No Executive, No Congress, No Court can change it unless they follow precisely the mechanisms provided in the Constitution itself-- adoption (2/3rds of Congress) and ratification of 38 States or Constitutional Convention. I would argue this nonsensical UN/WEF pact relates not to foreign policy but is deeply intrusive into our domestic well being and harmony and for this reason would require many amendments of our Constitution for Executive or Congress to action it in our Domestic affairs.
We have been loose to say the least in demanding this adherence which is one of the reasons we are now being choked by a giant hostile federal government. We have 50 States that agreed to the Constitution and each has every right to rescind its consent if the federal government should attempt to rescind our Constitution, which I think is very unlikely.
The more people who are demanding adherence to the Constitution on the part of our federal government, politicians, bureaucrats, executives, judges, soldiers and et. al. the more unlikely it would be. We should also engage in repairing the harm that has been done by continuing to reverse the unconstitutional actions already taken by the federal government. This will become easier as the reality of our nations collapsing finances bites deeper and deeper into our society.