Interesting that you tether free speech directly to health. I'm assuming media health, but I'm inclined to agree. There is a yin/yang to free speech that is easily separated when it becomes a choice between censorship or no censorship. Mental illness, lunatics, radicals and dark forces exist. Any or all of them could end up as the arbite…
Interesting that you tether free speech directly to health. I'm assuming media health, but I'm inclined to agree. There is a yin/yang to free speech that is easily separated when it becomes a choice between censorship or no censorship. Mental illness, lunatics, radicals and dark forces exist. Any or all of them could end up as the arbiters of allowable speech, if censorship is tolerated. My choice is that each of us must be our own arbiter of truth and ignore, not censor, those sources we each deem unreliable.
Interesting that you tether free speech directly to health. I'm assuming media health, but I'm inclined to agree. There is a yin/yang to free speech that is easily separated when it becomes a choice between censorship or no censorship. Mental illness, lunatics, radicals and dark forces exist. Any or all of them could end up as the arbiters of allowable speech, if censorship is tolerated. My choice is that each of us must be our own arbiter of truth and ignore, not censor, those sources we each deem unreliable.