It is curious isn't it? I read both Substacks. Some detractors of Dr. Malone charmingly seem to think that it is his responsibility to come up with an antidote to mRNA vaccines. Dr. Jane Ruby and Stew Peters talk like that. I have long thought it would be helpful for direct contact between these folks to straighten out some of the more b…
It is curious isn't it? I read both Substacks. Some detractors of Dr. Malone charmingly seem to think that it is his responsibility to come up with an antidote to mRNA vaccines. Dr. Jane Ruby and Stew Peters talk like that. I have long thought it would be helpful for direct contact between these folks to straighten out some of the more bizarre ideas. Dr. Malone posted awhile ago a long background piece and a video on what his background and roles were in building a foundation for mRNA technology. He said his wife helped put that together, out of frustration with the misrepresentation being put forth. Ruby and Peters aren't familiar with that work. Everybody is so angry and afraid, but it gets messier and counterproductive when people only have time to read the surface level of any story. Getting all this right takes time, effort, and discipline. What I have learned from my own career is that when most people are largely on the same side of an issue in a basic way it is quite harmful to attack within on the small stuff. Respectfully disagree or ongoing inquiry is needed to make sure the totality of the story is correct and accurate of course, but there is a well-crafted discipline and set of long traditions within science and journalism of doing that well which we seem to have lost.
It is curious isn't it? I read both Substacks. Some detractors of Dr. Malone charmingly seem to think that it is his responsibility to come up with an antidote to mRNA vaccines. Dr. Jane Ruby and Stew Peters talk like that. I have long thought it would be helpful for direct contact between these folks to straighten out some of the more bizarre ideas. Dr. Malone posted awhile ago a long background piece and a video on what his background and roles were in building a foundation for mRNA technology. He said his wife helped put that together, out of frustration with the misrepresentation being put forth. Ruby and Peters aren't familiar with that work. Everybody is so angry and afraid, but it gets messier and counterproductive when people only have time to read the surface level of any story. Getting all this right takes time, effort, and discipline. What I have learned from my own career is that when most people are largely on the same side of an issue in a basic way it is quite harmful to attack within on the small stuff. Respectfully disagree or ongoing inquiry is needed to make sure the totality of the story is correct and accurate of course, but there is a well-crafted discipline and set of long traditions within science and journalism of doing that well which we seem to have lost.