9 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 11, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Bill Marchuck's avatar

Sorry, Peter. I agree with Dr. Kerner. He called it what it is- a bioweapon. No secret that Bill Gates et. al. are eugenicists. Certainly some are in it for the money (10% for the Big Guy), but those at the top of the food chain have no need of money. They are psychotic megalomaniacs, plain and simple. And guess what, Colombo is not going to appear on the scene and get them to "confess". They won't go down easy!

Expand full comment
Jan's avatar

Concur. It is difficult because I hang around kind, good, altruistic people that have forgotten history and can't quite get their minds around evil. What has changed that would make us think we are exempt?

Expand full comment
Laura's avatar

I have to agree with that. I think somehow we got lazy and forgot that the full on psychopaths still live with us and that all of us a tiny psychopath inside us that needs to be restrained. We got too comfortable and believed that western civilization somehow tamed evil...

Expand full comment
T. Paine's avatar

Maybe we just werenтАЩt paying attention or appreciating how good our lives were and not considering what could go wrong.

Government is and always has been the biggest threat to life.

Expand full comment
Making waves's avatar

From someone (Dr. Fauci) who in 2012 reflected as follows on a hypothetical situation:

Imagine тАЬan important gain-of-function experiment involving a virus with serious pandemic potential is performedтАжwhat if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?тАжas indeed I have said тАУ that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risksтАжthe time it takes to engage in such a dialog <about whether these experiments should have been performed in the first place> could potentially delay or even immobilize the conduct of certain important experiments and the publication of valuable information that could move the field forward for the good of public health.тАЭ

At minimum he and the like value the data and research (and perhaps their resulting status) above all, even at the potential expense of innumerable lives and/or livelihoods. This allows them to align with those who perhaps go beyond those motives. Seems possible that involved parties each got what benefit they desired.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484390/

Expand full comment
MS's avatar

Different bad actors in something this big are going to have different agendas. That said, a mechanic covertly doing nefarious things to your car so you have to come back soon is one of the oldest tricks in the book. The trillion dollar question is big pharma above participating in such a thing?

Expand full comment
Shy Boy's avatar

The jab and the mass hysteria they've whipped up to push it is merely an on-ramp for the vaxxpass social credit and central bank digital currency system. Slavery! You'll own nothing and be happy, just ask Klaus Schwab.

Expand full comment
Cutter Frost's avatar

I read the tests were facilitating a bioweapon defense, that got out of control, caused by not china but the US, on one hand. On the other hand document outlines the vaccines don't really work. Was the play to create pressure to force downgraded version? Why focus on the kids, why does every statement start with proven safe and effective. Why are medical boards coming down on doctors for providing waiver to a product label that is untested in long term fertility?

Is this event a test for a live outbreak?

The power the California health officer invoked, Health and Safety Code sections 120125, 120140, 120175,120195 and 131080 are broad and unchecked. There is no threshold that needs to be met, such a fatality, for absolute power over Californian citizens.

13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility

"COMIRNATY has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or impairment of male fertility. In a developmental toxicity study in rats with COMIRNATY there were no vaccine-related effects on female fertility [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)]. "

8.1 Risk summary included "A developmental toxicity study has been performed in female rats administered the equivalent of a single human dose of COMIRNATY on 4 occasions; twice prior to mating and twice during gestation. These studies revealed no evidence of harm to the fetus due to the vaccine (see Animal Data)." This touches on pregnancy not fertility.

Where is Dr Sues, I am ready for some green eggs and ham

Expand full comment