Translation: whether technically legal or not, Fauci et. al. at the NIAID engaged in risky experiments and tried to keep it under the radar. When COVID was released, they suppressed the evidence of a lab leak and promoted the wet market theory in order to keep their experiments from being scrutinized. CYA for a major mistake like this …
Translation: whether technically legal or not, Fauci et. al. at the NIAID engaged in risky experiments and tried to keep it under the radar. When COVID was released, they suppressed the evidence of a lab leak and promoted the wet market theory in order to keep their experiments from being scrutinized. CYA for a major mistake like this is dishonest and represents a moral (perhaps legal) lack of judgement, but most can understand the temptation to engage in damage control. No one wants to go down in history as the guy who started a global pandemic.
What is MOST reprehensible is the suppression of life-saving early treatments. Even if these treatments protect a mere 25% of serious cases from death (the real number is probably much higher), how much suffering could have been avoided since this all started? What kind of a monster would actively work to keep these treatments from being widely distributed and promoted, even with the promise of large profits?
He could have done the cover-up while also promoting cheap repurposed early treatments. That would at least put him in the human category.
And what kind of monsters would strip great doctors like Kory and Marik and others from treating their patients with FDA approved drugs which have proven safety and efficacy (and are cheap/off-patent)?
Translation: whether technically legal or not, Fauci et. al. at the NIAID engaged in risky experiments and tried to keep it under the radar. When COVID was released, they suppressed the evidence of a lab leak and promoted the wet market theory in order to keep their experiments from being scrutinized. CYA for a major mistake like this is dishonest and represents a moral (perhaps legal) lack of judgement, but most can understand the temptation to engage in damage control. No one wants to go down in history as the guy who started a global pandemic.
What is MOST reprehensible is the suppression of life-saving early treatments. Even if these treatments protect a mere 25% of serious cases from death (the real number is probably much higher), how much suffering could have been avoided since this all started? What kind of a monster would actively work to keep these treatments from being widely distributed and promoted, even with the promise of large profits?
He could have done the cover-up while also promoting cheap repurposed early treatments. That would at least put him in the human category.
And what kind of monsters would strip great doctors like Kory and Marik and others from treating their patients with FDA approved drugs which have proven safety and efficacy (and are cheap/off-patent)?
Beyond scandalous.