I’m trying to remember where I read that either there is a provision or it is an amendment t being proposed at the WHO that basically says that if a member state decides to withdraw the process of disengaging is like three years. It makes me wonder--the imposition or proposal of that time frame. Kind of like whatever might prompt one t…
I’m trying to remember where I read that either there is a provision or it is an amendment t being proposed at the WHO that basically says that if a member state decides to withdraw the process of disengaging is like three years. It makes me wonder--the imposition or proposal of that time frame. Kind of like whatever might prompt one to withdraw will be executed and finished before a member state’s decision can alter the path forward. Just my two cents or reflection on what the WHO is up to.
I always wonder where the ability to enforce these kinds of international edicts against us lies if they are not enforced by a senate approved treaty. Did we actually sign such a stupid treaty?
I’m trying to remember where I read that either there is a provision or it is an amendment t being proposed at the WHO that basically says that if a member state decides to withdraw the process of disengaging is like three years. It makes me wonder--the imposition or proposal of that time frame. Kind of like whatever might prompt one to withdraw will be executed and finished before a member state’s decision can alter the path forward. Just my two cents or reflection on what the WHO is up to.
I always wonder where the ability to enforce these kinds of international edicts against us lies if they are not enforced by a senate approved treaty. Did we actually sign such a stupid treaty?