That, and just hungry for attention. Without Malone, they aren't going to get any on their own. And in their minds, they get more for themselves by smearing him then they would by standing by him...so they smear him. And FWIW, I followed Malone from the beginning of this debacle, and at that point in time was functioning as an "investiga…
That, and just hungry for attention. Without Malone, they aren't going to get any on their own. And in their minds, they get more for themselves by smearing him then they would by standing by him...so they smear him.
And FWIW, I followed Malone from the beginning of this debacle, and at that point in time was functioning as an "investigative political commentary author" for a well known conservative news website. I can say that I recall ADE was part of Malone's record of concerns from the beginning.
As for Malone having to tolerate the stupidity, I suppose doing an article like this one periodically to defend himself is a necessary evil, akin to taking out the trash IMO...
Agreed. He was talking about ADE, and immune imprinting, Geert etc. 2 years ago on Bannon. I love the Good Doctor’s technical exegesis as refuting the scurrilous accusations. In non-technical terms, it roughly translates as
That, and just hungry for attention. Without Malone, they aren't going to get any on their own. And in their minds, they get more for themselves by smearing him then they would by standing by him...so they smear him.
And FWIW, I followed Malone from the beginning of this debacle, and at that point in time was functioning as an "investigative political commentary author" for a well known conservative news website. I can say that I recall ADE was part of Malone's record of concerns from the beginning.
As for Malone having to tolerate the stupidity, I suppose doing an article like this one periodically to defend himself is a necessary evil, akin to taking out the trash IMO...
Agreed. He was talking about ADE, and immune imprinting, Geert etc. 2 years ago on Bannon. I love the Good Doctor’s technical exegesis as refuting the scurrilous accusations. In non-technical terms, it roughly translates as
“Suck on It!”