I don’t know about McCullough’s prior stance, but he stated clearly in a podcast last week that both Breggins’ theory about the existence of an evil cabal, and Desmet’s/Malone’s theory about Mass Formation, have merit and are cohesive. He attempted to bring both sides together by showing how their ideas are compatible and not in opposit…
I don’t know about McCullough’s prior stance, but he stated clearly in a podcast last week that both Breggins’ theory about the existence of an evil cabal, and Desmet’s/Malone’s theory about Mass Formation, have merit and are cohesive. He attempted to bring both sides together by showing how their ideas are compatible and not in opposition. So I don’t think McCullough is siding with the Breggins’ attacks on Malone.
I initially gave credence to Breggin’s argument that the theory of Mass Formation seemed to deflect the blame for unethical behavior. But after reading more of Desmet’s thesis, and after the Breggins began the personal attacks on Malone, I realized they were not only misinformed, they were off the rails.
Oh, th is is a very helpful summary. Thank you. I was surprised if Dr. McCullough chimed in against. Dr. Malone or Desmet. It seems much more in keeping that he would see merit to both angles, The Breggins and Desmet's perspectives. I imagine both sides would be compatible and not in opposition, so that makes sense. Yeah, I agree that Dr. Desmet's thesis does not deflect blame. Maybe the Breggins haven't even directly read or heard out what he is actually saying and just reacted. But, who knows.
Unfortunately, there are several others on “our side” who are concerned that Mass Formation could be used as a defense in a Nuremberg 2.0 (an example of their argument is here https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/mass-formation-hypnosis-disorder/comments). But the proper way to address this concern would have been to speak directly with Dr. Malone, not defame him.
Good to know, but that doesn't seem like a very good defense to me, since I'm sure mass formation occurred during the Holocaust too. That doesn't mean they didn't suffer the worse victimization conceivable. It just means people get fooled, go into denial, have group think and essentially believe the propanda. PsyOps is predicated on this knowledge. And knowledge of our mass formation process can hopefully help people be more cognizant of this phenomenon and wake up. "it's easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled" as Mark Twain said. Desmet's just explaining how it all happens, to my view, but I understand the fear and it's good to know that this is the concern. I agree speaking directly to Dr. Malone and Dr. Desmet would be the way to go.
Thank you, I appreciate the info. It is difficult to keep up with all the info swirling around. That does not excuse me from not doing more homework before I commented.
I don’t know about McCullough’s prior stance, but he stated clearly in a podcast last week that both Breggins’ theory about the existence of an evil cabal, and Desmet’s/Malone’s theory about Mass Formation, have merit and are cohesive. He attempted to bring both sides together by showing how their ideas are compatible and not in opposition. So I don’t think McCullough is siding with the Breggins’ attacks on Malone.
I initially gave credence to Breggin’s argument that the theory of Mass Formation seemed to deflect the blame for unethical behavior. But after reading more of Desmet’s thesis, and after the Breggins began the personal attacks on Malone, I realized they were not only misinformed, they were off the rails.
Oh, th is is a very helpful summary. Thank you. I was surprised if Dr. McCullough chimed in against. Dr. Malone or Desmet. It seems much more in keeping that he would see merit to both angles, The Breggins and Desmet's perspectives. I imagine both sides would be compatible and not in opposition, so that makes sense. Yeah, I agree that Dr. Desmet's thesis does not deflect blame. Maybe the Breggins haven't even directly read or heard out what he is actually saying and just reacted. But, who knows.
Unfortunately, there are several others on “our side” who are concerned that Mass Formation could be used as a defense in a Nuremberg 2.0 (an example of their argument is here https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/mass-formation-hypnosis-disorder/comments). But the proper way to address this concern would have been to speak directly with Dr. Malone, not defame him.
Good to know, but that doesn't seem like a very good defense to me, since I'm sure mass formation occurred during the Holocaust too. That doesn't mean they didn't suffer the worse victimization conceivable. It just means people get fooled, go into denial, have group think and essentially believe the propanda. PsyOps is predicated on this knowledge. And knowledge of our mass formation process can hopefully help people be more cognizant of this phenomenon and wake up. "it's easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled" as Mark Twain said. Desmet's just explaining how it all happens, to my view, but I understand the fear and it's good to know that this is the concern. I agree speaking directly to Dr. Malone and Dr. Desmet would be the way to go.
There will be no Nuremberg 2.0. The first was possible only because the Americans and Communists wanted it. https://www.amazon.com/Judgment-Moscow-Soviet-Western-Complicity-ebook/dp/B07NTQTRHN
Thank you, I appreciate the info. It is difficult to keep up with all the info swirling around. That does not excuse me from not doing more homework before I commented.