And that's the tack to take: Everyone has opinions. We quietly take what we can and weigh them against our own observations and intuition. To weaponize such an attack seems inexplicable. The fact (up through today) that they won't debate their critique with Desmet or Malone is suspicious. Unresponsiveness is how the clerics and mullahs behave. So unseemly for "our side".
And that's the tack to take: Everyone has opinions. We quietly take what we can and weigh them against our own observations and intuition. To weaponize such an attack seems inexplicable. The fact (up through today) that they won't debate their critique with Desmet or Malone is suspicious. Unresponsiveness is how the clerics and mullahs behave. So unseemly for "our side".
And that's the tack to take: Everyone has opinions. We quietly take what we can and weigh them against our own observations and intuition. To weaponize such an attack seems inexplicable. The fact (up through today) that they won't debate their critique with Desmet or Malone is suspicious. Unresponsiveness is how the clerics and mullahs behave. So unseemly for "our side".
I COMPLETELY agree. He's talking out the side of his neck AND won't have civil discourse, so he's lost merit and credibility.