I find it unbelievably sad that otherwise intelligent people could not (or would not) believe that Hillary "The Commie" Clinton was the one in cahoots with the Russians. I knew from Day One that the Russian collusion stories were fake - and I thought Hillary was likely at the bottom of it.
I find it unbelievably sad that otherwise intelligent people could not (or would not) believe that Hillary "The Commie" Clinton was the one in cahoots with the Russians. I knew from Day One that the Russian collusion stories were fake - and I thought Hillary was likely at the bottom of it.
I was worried at first, but after I learned in 2017 that the Steele dossiers were funded by Hillary through her lawyers it was obvious that the whole thing was a dirty political trick. Ironically, Trump was investigated for colluding with Russia while the person who seeded the story was the one who sold our uranium assets to Russia in exchange for contributions to the Clinton Global Initiative.
But just a little reflection and you realize it's quite a lot worse than that: the collusion hoax was playing fast and loose with public opinion regarding a nuclear armed great power.
Just wondering, do you know what actually happened to those assets in that Canadian company that were 'sold' and made available for equity to the mining and trucking companies for racketeering and providing more funding for the Clinton Foundation? I know they were eventually repurchased by a Texas company, but it's curious which route they took since the Russians never fully closed the deal before paying off the Clintons.
That's part of the problem. It wasn't actually the 'supply' that was being sold to them even though that's how most of the 'press' presented it. It sold more stories and got more click throughs, thus more income for the writers and their employers. It definitely WAS a bad idea and COULD have resulted in some dangerous situations, but it was mainly used to funnel cash around by the Clintons and their foundation and was also used by the Russian oligarchs as leverage in other transactions.
After moving to Oregon in 1979 and entering my sons in school I was informed of its program that gave the pupils regular fluorid treatments and it required parental consent. I said I think not. I had read that fluoride was a waste product and there could be harmful effects from fluoridation in drinking water. I was not leery of the health system per se, or suspicious but was prone to curiosity. Dig a little, find a little. That was not easy to do back then but there were sources (not hounded by the media). More curiosity back then.
I find it unbelievably sad that otherwise intelligent people could not (or would not) believe that Hillary "The Commie" Clinton was the one in cahoots with the Russians. I knew from Day One that the Russian collusion stories were fake - and I thought Hillary was likely at the bottom of it.
I was worried at first, but after I learned in 2017 that the Steele dossiers were funded by Hillary through her lawyers it was obvious that the whole thing was a dirty political trick. Ironically, Trump was investigated for colluding with Russia while the person who seeded the story was the one who sold our uranium assets to Russia in exchange for contributions to the Clinton Global Initiative.
But just a little reflection and you realize it's quite a lot worse than that: the collusion hoax was playing fast and loose with public opinion regarding a nuclear armed great power.
Just wondering, do you know what actually happened to those assets in that Canadian company that were 'sold' and made available for equity to the mining and trucking companies for racketeering and providing more funding for the Clinton Foundation? I know they were eventually repurchased by a Texas company, but it's curious which route they took since the Russians never fully closed the deal before paying off the Clintons.
I did not know that Russia never got that Uranium supply.
That's part of the problem. It wasn't actually the 'supply' that was being sold to them even though that's how most of the 'press' presented it. It sold more stories and got more click throughs, thus more income for the writers and their employers. It definitely WAS a bad idea and COULD have resulted in some dangerous situations, but it was mainly used to funnel cash around by the Clintons and their foundation and was also used by the Russian oligarchs as leverage in other transactions.
That part was obvious but I was ignorant of the health establishments corruption since I had little reason to interact with it.
Yes, it took me a while to realize that the Wu Flu was a concerted effort to push totalitarianism.
After moving to Oregon in 1979 and entering my sons in school I was informed of its program that gave the pupils regular fluorid treatments and it required parental consent. I said I think not. I had read that fluoride was a waste product and there could be harmful effects from fluoridation in drinking water. I was not leery of the health system per se, or suspicious but was prone to curiosity. Dig a little, find a little. That was not easy to do back then but there were sources (not hounded by the media). More curiosity back then.