That's part of the problem. It wasn't actually the 'supply' that was being sold to them even though that's how most of the 'press' presented it. It sold more stories and got more click throughs, thus more income for the writers and their employers. It definitely WAS a bad idea and COULD have resulted in some dangerous situations, but it …
That's part of the problem. It wasn't actually the 'supply' that was being sold to them even though that's how most of the 'press' presented it. It sold more stories and got more click throughs, thus more income for the writers and their employers. It definitely WAS a bad idea and COULD have resulted in some dangerous situations, but it was mainly used to funnel cash around by the Clintons and their foundation and was also used by the Russian oligarchs as leverage in other transactions.
That's part of the problem. It wasn't actually the 'supply' that was being sold to them even though that's how most of the 'press' presented it. It sold more stories and got more click throughs, thus more income for the writers and their employers. It definitely WAS a bad idea and COULD have resulted in some dangerous situations, but it was mainly used to funnel cash around by the Clintons and their foundation and was also used by the Russian oligarchs as leverage in other transactions.