True. But he has proven himself to be untrustworthy. We certainly value his contributions but can’t afford to follow anyone who undermines this critical fight.
True. But he has proven himself to be untrustworthy. We certainly value his contributions but can’t afford to follow anyone who undermines this critical fight.
You are right about that. The problem appears to be determining if his undermining it is of greater consequences than his contributions.
I tend to look at a lot of issues as a function of resolution of your view. If you turn down the power of your telescope, the moon is a white round bright smooth ball. If its high enough its a mottled be-speckled pockmarked haphazard landscape. You only really need to know that if you plan to go there.
So let's not turn the magnification up so high that the differences tear down the commonalities, which we urgently need if we are to win this fight. And its an existential fight.
True. But he has proven himself to be untrustworthy. We certainly value his contributions but can’t afford to follow anyone who undermines this critical fight.
You are right about that. The problem appears to be determining if his undermining it is of greater consequences than his contributions.
I tend to look at a lot of issues as a function of resolution of your view. If you turn down the power of your telescope, the moon is a white round bright smooth ball. If its high enough its a mottled be-speckled pockmarked haphazard landscape. You only really need to know that if you plan to go there.
So let's not turn the magnification up so high that the differences tear down the commonalities, which we urgently need if we are to win this fight. And its an existential fight.