2 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

I agree. The insurance companies could be a key piece. If they are paying out big monies due to the toxicity of the vaccines….particularly for life insurance, they would or should be vested in determining if that is the result of fraud by big pharma. Part of the challenge is to figure out how to procedurally out big pharma in the cross hairs.

One of the things I like about Steve Kirsch’s approach or harassing the FDA/CDC and government officials with data, facts, and concerns is that he is actively eliminating their ability to claim they were not on notice.

Interestingly, this could theoretically be the basis for maintaining that the fraud is ongoing. For example, if big pharma is able to effectively cover its tracks on the data that they say warranted an EUA…..as data starts suggesting that on a larger scale the favorable results do not hold true…..the FDA/CDC arguably have a duty to investigate those harms to verify whether the representations from limited studies under the EUA hold up. However, we know they have actively avoided examining the issues.

So this would suggest negligence…..but a legal argument can be made that the negligence is intentionally reckless to the point that malicious intent can be inferred. Then that means it falls outside the scope of their protected public role and duties. They would have to explain their failure or run the risk of it being determined to be intentional and fraud. Almost like pitting those who are in cahoots against each other.

I hope that as more and more evidence surfaces then the case for fraud or intentional and recklessly malicious actions can be made. At that point, due to Steve’s persistence, none of the officials can claim they did not know or did not have notice.

What I keep coming back to….somebody has to foot the bill for all of this. We are seriously in debt as a nation. We are facing the 4th Industrial Revolution that will eliminate jobs in favor of automation (which favors the fin/tech elite), and more and more Americans are in financial straits. But yet, those in the WH and those beating the COVID drums seem unphased…..why is that? I can’t shake the feeling that something more is coming.

An example of how I’m thinking….notice how the FDA/CDC just lifted or eased some pandemic rules. They are doing this as schools go back into session. I expect that we will see a jump in positive cases (but not severe ones). This will lead to another round of talking about the need for protocols as we await the booster that Moderna and Pfizer are supposedly working on to be rolled out in September. So….I’m thinking we are in a wash, rinse, repeat pattern and there are till way too many who will sign up for yet another shot or scream about shutting down schools to protect the public. I do not think for a moment that Fauci, Gates, or any of the other architects of this nightmare have changed their plans.

It blows me away….visited with a friend and her family the other day. She is vaccinated/boostedX2 and had COVID in December of 2021. She let me know that she has come down with COVID again. Meanwhile, my family (with the exception of my husband) have not been vaccinated, have had COVID (which was very doable) and none of us got COVID after visiting her. Even she said….”I am beginning to wonder….” I should hope so at this point.

But hey. I am ahead of most because I already tracked Gates and his $$$$ and all the harm in the wake of his education reform which is all part of the same agenda.

Expand full comment

The end result we are all hoping/wishing/praying for (as advocated by Kisrsh/Dowd) and a host of others in the realm of pushing the legality into motions often takes so long. Twenty or thirty years goes by and the high priced lawyers on both sides have done the public a total dis-service of a product liability case. (as in Tobacco or asbestos) Years of discovery of evidence in plain view till a court case flourished.

Expand full comment