Well, I would not be for such a system you describe. Any concept like this relies on vetting and pruning and a dynamic dumping of all who fail to simply vote honestly, objectively. Possibly consequences if they FAIL or are corrupted.
Term limits of two election cycles; not re-upped for second term until 5 yrs pass?
Well, I would not be for such a system you describe. Any concept like this relies on vetting and pruning and a dynamic dumping of all who fail to simply vote honestly, objectively. Possibly consequences if they FAIL or are corrupted.
Term limits of two election cycles; not re-upped for second term until 5 yrs pass?
The big idea:
-- prevent non-sensical laws, help drain the swamp
I don't pretend to have it all thought out nor would I wish to make the situation worse.
Well, I would not be for such a system you describe. Any concept like this relies on vetting and pruning and a dynamic dumping of all who fail to simply vote honestly, objectively. Possibly consequences if they FAIL or are corrupted.
Term limits of two election cycles; not re-upped for second term until 5 yrs pass?
The big idea:
-- prevent non-sensical laws, help drain the swamp
I don't pretend to have it all thought out nor would I wish to make the situation worse.
OK, so now we have a super- super- set of "voters" making sure the initial super voters vote properly.
p-rog, I’m sympathetic with your argument and what you’re trying to accomplish, it’s the same internal discussion I’ve been having