Your link is to one of the articles that gave me the impression that the specific SV40 promoter sequence was found in the Pfizer jabs, but not (yet) in others. (Looking at the top two tweets by Kevin McKernan quoted by Steven Kirsch, you'll see how this impression was conveyed.)
Though the CRISPR model is applied as a more efficient, prec…
Your link is to one of the articles that gave me the impression that the specific SV40 promoter sequence was found in the Pfizer jabs, but not (yet) in others. (Looking at the top two tweets by Kevin McKernan quoted by Steven Kirsch, you'll see how this impression was conveyed.)
Though the CRISPR model is applied as a more efficient, precise technology for cutting DNA at a desired location, (and allowing insertion of chosen sequences), adding foreign DNA to various organisms has been going on for a very long time.
More recently, ethical considerations attendant with the risk of modifying human germ line DNA seem to have been entirely shelved.
Thanks for the update. Last comment not true! It’s full steam ahead to manipulate the blue print of life! Billions and billions have been invested and everybody’s jumping in and the complexity of the human cell is not appreciated nor fully understood! The manipulation of the DNA of man animals and vegetables is ongoing!
Trying to understand the independent researchers who are investigating what's in the COVID jabs has been motivating me to update the genetics training. (I heard that constantly updating my brain might eventually serve to ward off senility.) Listening to Kevin McKernan addressing his analytical techniques is inspiring. He blows my hair back with the speed of his delivery, but using the back scrubbing button a little, his explanations are pretty clear. He just posted on Anandamide / Nepetalactone SubStack why he thinks Pfizer might have played 'hide-the-SV40-DNA- sequences' with the regulators.
Your link is to one of the articles that gave me the impression that the specific SV40 promoter sequence was found in the Pfizer jabs, but not (yet) in others. (Looking at the top two tweets by Kevin McKernan quoted by Steven Kirsch, you'll see how this impression was conveyed.)
Though the CRISPR model is applied as a more efficient, precise technology for cutting DNA at a desired location, (and allowing insertion of chosen sequences), adding foreign DNA to various organisms has been going on for a very long time.
More recently, ethical considerations attendant with the risk of modifying human germ line DNA seem to have been entirely shelved.
Thanks for the update. Last comment not true! It’s full steam ahead to manipulate the blue print of life! Billions and billions have been invested and everybody’s jumping in and the complexity of the human cell is not appreciated nor fully understood! The manipulation of the DNA of man animals and vegetables is ongoing!
Trying to understand the independent researchers who are investigating what's in the COVID jabs has been motivating me to update the genetics training. (I heard that constantly updating my brain might eventually serve to ward off senility.) Listening to Kevin McKernan addressing his analytical techniques is inspiring. He blows my hair back with the speed of his delivery, but using the back scrubbing button a little, his explanations are pretty clear. He just posted on Anandamide / Nepetalactone SubStack why he thinks Pfizer might have played 'hide-the-SV40-DNA- sequences' with the regulators.
100 billion can buy an Asteroid of deadly med-manipulations.
The Evil Doers have "practiced" at the Art of Deceptions.
Well I can tell by..... blood stained hands. Mick Jagger