How could you be proven wrong with such a nebulous theory? Anyhow, as the promulgator of a theory, it is your responsibility to prove it. This turn of saying other people have to prove you wrong is weak.
But a philosophical position like yours doesn't really need proof as much as it needs a clearer elaboration. HOW does human nature c…
How could you be proven wrong with such a nebulous theory? Anyhow, as the promulgator of a theory, it is your responsibility to prove it. This turn of saying other people have to prove you wrong is weak.
But a philosophical position like yours doesn't really need proof as much as it needs a clearer elaboration. HOW does human nature cause all our destructive behaviors? How do you know that there is a better alternative? What is it?
How could you be proven wrong with such a nebulous theory? Anyhow, as the promulgator of a theory, it is your responsibility to prove it. This turn of saying other people have to prove you wrong is weak.
But a philosophical position like yours doesn't really need proof as much as it needs a clearer elaboration. HOW does human nature cause all our destructive behaviors? How do you know that there is a better alternative? What is it?