I think, in life, we always look for the most plausible explanation. Such as if the virus emerged in Wuhan, and there was a virology lab in Wuhan, then the "wet market" thesis is more than a bit "wet." So Oswald as the "lone gunman" would not be the most rational nor first choice.
If you are saying that Oswald was a lone gunman, then you are the one who is not being rational!
I think, in life, we always look for the most plausible explanation. Such as if the virus emerged in Wuhan, and there was a virology lab in Wuhan, then the "wet market" thesis is more than a bit "wet." So Oswald as the "lone gunman" would not be the most rational nor first choice.
He doesn't seem to be saying that.