The Battle of Evermore

Observations from Globalism Central

We are in Geneva, the international capital of Globalism.

We all sense an impending battle. But do we know who is friend and who is foe?

Do we understand our allies as well as our opponents?

Simple stereotypes will not lead to victory.

Both sides think that they represent the future. Both sides think they are battling evil to save the world.

All passionately believe that they fight for the common good.

On one side, with a sense of noblesse oblige, a transnational elite works to advance a unified, globalized, centralized political and economic world order. A world order based on a command economy rooted in massive databases, predictive artificial intelligence-driven decision making and the merging of man and machine to create a new species.

Fulfilling this objective is believed to require universal surveillance, propaganda powered by modern psychology, algorithmic censorship, cultural homogenization, and centralized automated economic controls and resource allocation.

I believe that this will be a digital, technocratic and bureaucratic hell. I believe that Yeats’ Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, now slouches towards Geneva to be born. I believe in humanity. And I believe in the divine.

Our side believes in the pragmatic benefits of the Principal of Subsidiarity; Decision making at the most local competent politically representative structure. We believe in decentralization, nationalism, unique cultural identities, individual and national sovereignty, and the power of human innovation.

Centralized planning and control destroys the ability of individuals, cultures, and nations to innovate. Globalized, centralized planning and control will kill the motivation and ability of the human race to adapt to changing conditions. After the Soviet Union and so many others, do we really need another example before we can learn this lesson? Or does each era need to recycle history?

Elevating a new global centralized nobility will not lead to prosperity, innovation, and effective adaptation; it will destroy these things. We have seen the failure of this model over the last few years of the COVIDcrisis. How many more examples do we need?

I believe in the power of diversified independent thought, cultural heritage, and freedom.

In this battle, I do not know which vision will prevail.

What I do know is that old imperialistic models are outdated, and old empires and old ways of geopolitical thinking face imminent collapse. But they will not go quietly into the night.

And what I am absolutely sure of is that censorship will not save this version of imperialism currently hiding behind the weaponized propaganda term “Democracy”.

And that the weaponization of fear of infectious disease to control human behavior is ethically evil, and that those who deploy these unethical practices to advance their objectives of political power, profit and control should be shamed and condemned. The use of psychological bioterrorism is wrong, and it must stop.

For the sake of our children, we must oppose both Transhumanism and weaponized fear.

And we must insist on freedom, Dammit.

---

---