Elites are not operating on principles, they are operating on relationships: them powerful, us weak. "Common Good" isn't even in their vocabulary or mental concepts.
I understand the intellectual point people try to make with this direction of analysis, but, i…
Elites are not operating on principles, they are operating on relationships: them powerful, us weak. "Common Good" isn't even in their vocabulary or mental concepts.
I understand the intellectual point people try to make with this direction of analysis, but, in this case and in my opinion, by making the difference about definition of terms, it puts the offenders on the same moral plane as the victims.
It is not "well it's just a difference in terminology", it is "good vs evil".
The 'elites' with their Agendas 2030, 2050 and WHO updates purport to be acting in the interests of humanity. I generally appreciate that their covert solutions are not in the interests of all of humanity. I appreciate your characterizing them as evil. On the other hand, in the end what matters is coming up with strategies to overcome the 'evils' they plan to visit upon us.
Neil, I think Dr. Malone's point is more fundamental than intellectual points, definition of terms, and terminology. He is addressing persistent, classical, subjective differences in perception, in point of view. And therefore resulting in hugely polarizing differences in causes and cures.
I fully understand that. My point is there is a time to debate and a time for brass knuckles. We are in the latter. We need to stop the intellectualization for now. Minced and Recycled vegetative matter is still horseshit.
Good and Bad result from principles.
Powerful and Weak result from relationships.
Elites are not operating on principles, they are operating on relationships: them powerful, us weak. "Common Good" isn't even in their vocabulary or mental concepts.
I understand the intellectual point people try to make with this direction of analysis, but, in this case and in my opinion, by making the difference about definition of terms, it puts the offenders on the same moral plane as the victims.
It is not "well it's just a difference in terminology", it is "good vs evil".
The 'elites' with their Agendas 2030, 2050 and WHO updates purport to be acting in the interests of humanity. I generally appreciate that their covert solutions are not in the interests of all of humanity. I appreciate your characterizing them as evil. On the other hand, in the end what matters is coming up with strategies to overcome the 'evils' they plan to visit upon us.
Neil, I think Dr. Malone's point is more fundamental than intellectual points, definition of terms, and terminology. He is addressing persistent, classical, subjective differences in perception, in point of view. And therefore resulting in hugely polarizing differences in causes and cures.
I fully understand that. My point is there is a time to debate and a time for brass knuckles. We are in the latter. We need to stop the intellectualization for now. Minced and Recycled vegetative matter is still horseshit.