https://treaties.unoda.org/t/bwc WOW: I was NOT READY FOR THAT: I will tell you this: I worked for George Todaro, directly and have written a book about the huge Political nastyfest which you refer to called Nobel Prize Hijacked. (copyrighted and nonpublished yet maybe never as I have retina issues) I worked for George at a campus of NI…
https://treaties.unoda.org/t/bwc WOW: I was NOT READY FOR THAT: I will tell you this: I worked for George Todaro, directly and have written a book about the huge Political nastyfest which you refer to called Nobel Prize Hijacked. (copyrighted and nonpublished yet maybe never as I have retina issues) I worked for George at a campus of NIH during the peak the RNA reverse transcriptase and attempt to located the Oncogene virus which he and another scientist presented in 1969 to the scientific community. LET ME COMMENT BRIEFLY, I did subscribe and I am familiar with your positions and so far we are in agreement. I have B.S in Molecular Biology and I was trained in biohazard/bioweapon research but at the time we did not consider it "bioweapon research" but there was always that feeling of we are working with highly dangerous material and acted appropriately. I personally knew and I am sure she is retired now many of the people who maintain our viral repository in Maryland and have seen it with my own eyes, she gave me a tour when I was in town one day. TO YOUR POINT: YOU ARE CORRECT in your analysis even though I don't agree in concept that "Biological Weapons Treaties" which are based on GLOBAL leadership are applicable to the United States of America because we all know in fact that these Chemical and Biological Weapons agreements are not only unenforceable (as we saw with the Coronavirus Pandemic) for the same reasons that Iran denies us ability to look at their "peaceful" nuclear productions. I could write a lot more right now. Thank you for your extremely astute analysis. Before I return again.. I am going to check out. as in download the quote quote your article "famous “Asilomar Conference” that first defined ethical limits for recombinant DNA research occurred in 1975, three years later. The ability to create truly horrific new viruses is no longer “rocket science.” I have done thousands of hours of research on this and worked in the field as well. Gosh I have to stop: I did post that Japan did a hard hitting expose on China's ability to use the CRSPR technique to alter the Coronavirus and is busily using it to edit the Germ line DNA of Humans. I am sure with your background that you are aware other non scientists are in agreement with "us" about the Bioweapon, Chemical weapons in Ukraine one of whom is William Engdahl. THANKS.. I did subscribe.. and I will take a look at you and your wife's posted works. Have a Great DAY.. JOB WELL DONE AND SAID!!! "Izzy" Isabella Hale
It would appear dear Izzy, that you as well have had the view from the "Eagles Nest" for a good long time! Great of you to chime in on what matters moving forward. Good on ye!
I kept personal journals since 1973 when I started working with RNA viruses; it did change the direction of my lfe and career: been at this for many years: how perceptive of you! :) Izzy. :)
https://treaties.unoda.org/t/bwc WOW: I was NOT READY FOR THAT: I will tell you this: I worked for George Todaro, directly and have written a book about the huge Political nastyfest which you refer to called Nobel Prize Hijacked. (copyrighted and nonpublished yet maybe never as I have retina issues) I worked for George at a campus of NIH during the peak the RNA reverse transcriptase and attempt to located the Oncogene virus which he and another scientist presented in 1969 to the scientific community. LET ME COMMENT BRIEFLY, I did subscribe and I am familiar with your positions and so far we are in agreement. I have B.S in Molecular Biology and I was trained in biohazard/bioweapon research but at the time we did not consider it "bioweapon research" but there was always that feeling of we are working with highly dangerous material and acted appropriately. I personally knew and I am sure she is retired now many of the people who maintain our viral repository in Maryland and have seen it with my own eyes, she gave me a tour when I was in town one day. TO YOUR POINT: YOU ARE CORRECT in your analysis even though I don't agree in concept that "Biological Weapons Treaties" which are based on GLOBAL leadership are applicable to the United States of America because we all know in fact that these Chemical and Biological Weapons agreements are not only unenforceable (as we saw with the Coronavirus Pandemic) for the same reasons that Iran denies us ability to look at their "peaceful" nuclear productions. I could write a lot more right now. Thank you for your extremely astute analysis. Before I return again.. I am going to check out. as in download the quote quote your article "famous “Asilomar Conference” that first defined ethical limits for recombinant DNA research occurred in 1975, three years later. The ability to create truly horrific new viruses is no longer “rocket science.” I have done thousands of hours of research on this and worked in the field as well. Gosh I have to stop: I did post that Japan did a hard hitting expose on China's ability to use the CRSPR technique to alter the Coronavirus and is busily using it to edit the Germ line DNA of Humans. I am sure with your background that you are aware other non scientists are in agreement with "us" about the Bioweapon, Chemical weapons in Ukraine one of whom is William Engdahl. THANKS.. I did subscribe.. and I will take a look at you and your wife's posted works. Have a Great DAY.. JOB WELL DONE AND SAID!!! "Izzy" Isabella Hale
It would appear dear Izzy, that you as well have had the view from the "Eagles Nest" for a good long time! Great of you to chime in on what matters moving forward. Good on ye!
I kept personal journals since 1973 when I started working with RNA viruses; it did change the direction of my lfe and career: been at this for many years: how perceptive of you! :) Izzy. :)